Cover not available
Article In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 17:1 (2024) ► pp.–

The thematic organization of consumer safety instructions in English

ORCID logo | University of Gothenburg , Sweden

This study investigates how the content of consumer safety instructions is organized in Themes and N-Rhemes and connected by thematic progressions. The Themes are chiefly directives or representations of the product and its usage. The goal of safety instructions, on the other hand, i.e. avoiding dangers and their negative outcomes, is mainly represented in the N-Rhemes. Thematic progressions are frequently linear, which reflects the expert/non-expert relationship between the writers and readers, or derived, which reflects the somewhat disjointedness of this text type. There are also many Rheme iterations connecting imperative clauses. In this respect the thematic organization of procedural texts differs significantly from texts where declarative clauses are predominant.

Keywords: N-rheme, rheme, thematic progression, theme
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background and earlier research
    • 2.1Themes and Rhemes
    • 2.2Thematic progressions
  • 3.Material
  • 4.Method
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Themes
    • 5.2N-Rhemes
    • 5.3Progressions
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References
Berry, Margaret
1995 Thematic options and success in writing. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 55–84.Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret, Geoff Thompson & Hilary Hillier
2014 Theme and variations. In Maria Gómez González, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibanez, Francisco González-Garcia & Angela Downing (eds.) Theory and practice in Functional-Cognitive space. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 107–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Tessa & Judy Delin
1998 Written instructions in Japanese and English: a comparative analysis. Pragmatics 8(3). 339–385.Google Scholar
Christobalena Frutos, Araceli
2018 Corpus-rhetorical analysis of the sub-genre of instruction manuals for household appliances. Ibérica, Journal of the European Association of Languages for Specific Purposes 361. 143–170.Google Scholar
Ciliberti, Anna
1990 Instructions for use: A macrotextual and stylistic analysis. In Michael A. K. Halliday, John Gibbons & Howard Nicholas (eds.) Learning, keeping and using language. Vol. II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 299–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, John
2009 Theme, field and genre: thematic realisations in academic articles and their popularisations. In Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture. London: Equinox. 70–93.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, Pieter A., Joris van Hoof, & Mark van Vuuren
2014 Enabling employees to work safely: the influence of motivation and ability in the design of safety instructions. Technical Communication 61(4). 232–244.Google Scholar
Crompton, Peter
2004 Theme in discourse. ‘Thematic progression’ and ‘method of development’ re-evaluated. Functions of Language 11(2). 213–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Michael
2003 The role of Theme and Rheme in contrasting methods of organization of texts. In Christopher Butler (ed.), Dynamics of language use: Functional and contrastive perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 129–154.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In František Daneš (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective. The Hague: Mouton. 106–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Mónica, Juan Soler-Company & Leo Wanner
2020 ThemePro: A toolkit for the analysis of thematic progression. Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. Marseille: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). 1000–1007.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela
1991 An alternative approach to Theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word 421. 119–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, Betty Lou
1987 A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text 21. 89–116.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne
2004 An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
Elgemark, Anna
2017 To the very end. A contrastive study of N-Rhemes in English and Swedish translations. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University PhD thesis.
Enkvist, Nils Erik
1974 Theme dynamics and style: an experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 51. 127–135.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2008 Theme zones in English media discourse: forms and functions. Journal of Pragmatics 401. 1543–1568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Peter. H.
1983 On the status of Theme in English: arguments from discourse. In János S. Petöfi & Emel Sözer (eds.), Micro and macro connexity of texts. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. 116–152.Google Scholar
1993 Information flow in written advertising. In James Alatis (ed.), Language, communication and social meaning. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 336–352.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter H.
1995a A personal view of Theme. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 1–19.Google Scholar
1995b Patterns of information in initial position in English. In Peter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic Functional perspectives. Norwood: Ablex. 47–65.Google Scholar
2002 The flow of information in a written English text. In Peter H. Fries, Michael Cummings, David Lockwood & William Spruiell (eds.) Relations and functions within and around language. London: Continuum. 117–155.Google Scholar
2008 The textual metafunction as a site for a discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. In Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture. London: Equinox. 8–44.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter H. & Gill Francis
1992 Exploring Theme: problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 61. 45–49.Google Scholar
Ghadessy, Mohsen
1995 Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 129–146.Google Scholar
Gómez González, Maria. A.
2001 The Theme-topic interface. Evidence from English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez González, Maria. A. & Ana P. García Varela
2014 Discourse-organizational patterns in English and Spanish. Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada 27(1). 87–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. revised by Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1978 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawes, Thomas
2015 Thematic progression in the writing of students and professionals. Ampersand 21. 93–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herriman, Jennifer
2011 N-rhemes in English problem-solution texts. English Text Construction 4(1). 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2002 Directives: arguments and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics 23(2). 215–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kizil, Marina & Elina Kushch
2019 Thematic progression and its types in English literary and legislative texts. Advanced Education 121. 181–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Lijin. & Gordon Tucker
2015 Thematic choice and progression in English and Chinese radio news. Text and Talk 35(4). 481–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992 English text. System and structure. Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2007 Working with discourse. 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian
1995 THEME as an enabling resource in ideational ‘knowledge’ construction. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. Pinter: London. 20–47.Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
1993 Theme and progression in written discourse. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology. Philadelphia: Amsterdam. 95–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehlenbacher, Brad, Michael Wogalter & Kenneth Laughery
2002 On reading the product owner’s manuals: perceptions and product complexity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting. (46)61. 730–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin. & Thomas Bloor
1991 Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In Eija Ventola (ed.) Functional and Systemic Linguistics. Approaches and uses. Berlin: Mouton. 369–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paris, Cecile & Donia Scott
1994 Stylistic Variation in Multilingual Instructions. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation. Kennebunkport, Maine. 45–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ping, Leong Alvin
2005 Talking themes: the thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies 7(6). 701–732. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Topical themes and thematic progression: the “picture” of research articles. Text & Talk 35(3). 289–315.Google Scholar
Povolná, Renata
2018 On some persuasive strategies in technical discourse: cross-cultural analysis of directives in English and Czech technical manuals. Topics in Linguistics 19(2). 72–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sager, Juan, David Dungworth & Peter McDonald
1980 English special languages. Principles and practice in science and technology. Wiesbaden: Oscar Brandstetter Verlag.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Michael
2014 Language forms and rhetorical functions in technical instructions. English for Specific Purposes World. 15(43). 1–9.Google Scholar
Schubert, Christoph
2016 Cohesion in contrast: A case study of English and German user manuals. SKY Journal of Linguistics 291. 95–117.Google Scholar
Trimble, Louis
1985 English for science and technology: A discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2006 Collaborating towards coherence. Lexical cohesion in English Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson
2009 Theme, subject and the unfolding text. In Gail Forey, & Geoff Thompson (eds.) Text type and texture. London: Equinox. 45–69.Google Scholar
Whittaker, Rachel
1995 Theme, processes and the realization of meanings in academic articles. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter. 105–128.Google Scholar
Wright, Patricia, Patricia Crighton & S. M. Threlfall
1982 Some factors determining when instructions will be read. Ergonomics 25(3). 225–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Qun
1991 Toward thematic selection in different genre: Fables and recipes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar