Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 7:1 (2014) ► pp.53–83

Vocatives galore in audiovisual dialogue

Evidence from a corpus of American and British films

The paper explores the use of vocatives in a corpus of 24 American and British films (the Pavia Corpus of Film Dialogue) by comparing film dialogue with spontaneous speech. A systematic quantitative and qualitative analysis of empirical data is provided to assess how address forms used by English speakers in natural verbal exchanges are reproduced on screen, and to identify patterns of address that can be regarded as distinctive of film dialogue. The findings show a higher frequency of vocatives in film dialogue, which serve diegetic and extradiegetic functions. From a qualitative point of view, filmic speech effectively reproduces interpersonal functions and sociolinguistic variation associated with vocatives in spontaneous interactions; on the other hand, it is characterized by a sophisticated use of address strategies accounted for in terms of authorial expressivity.

Keywords: film dialogue, American English, conversation, British English, vocatives
Published online: 28 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.7.1.03for
References
Agha, Asif.
1994 Honorification. Annual Review of Anthropology 231: 277–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, D.J.
1996 Proper names and definite descriptions with the same reference: A pragmatic choice for language users. Journal of Pragmatics 25 (5): 621–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alvarez-Pereyre, Michael.
2011 Using film as linguistic specimen: Theoretical and practical issues. In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 47–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aston, Guy and Lou Burnard.
1998 The BNC Handbook: Exploring the British National Corpus with SARA. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Axelson, Elisabeth.
2007 Vocatives: A double-edged strategy in intercultural discourse among graduate students. Pragmatics 17 (1): 95–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azzaro, Gabriele.
2005 Four-Letter Films: Taboo Language in Movies. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Bargiela, Francesca, Corinne Boz, Lily Gokzadze, Abdurrahman Hamza, Sara Mills and Nino Rukhadze.
2002 Ethnocentrism, politeness and naming strategies. Working Papers on the Web 3. URL [URL](Last accessed on 7 February 2013).
Bednarek, Monika.
2011a The stability of the televisual character: A corpus stylistic case study. In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 185–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Expressivity and televisual characterization. Language and Literature 20 (1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Get us the hell out of here”: Key words and trigrams in fictional television series. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (1): 35–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan.
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Braun, Frederike.
1988 Terms of Address: Problems of Patterns and Usage in Various Languages and Cultures. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson.
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger and Marguerite Ford.
1961 Address in American English. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62 (2): 375–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruti, Silvia and Elisa Perego.
2008 Vocatives in subtitles: A survey across genres. In Ecolingua: The Role of E-Corpora in Translation and Language Learning, Christopher Taylor (ed.). Trieste: EUT, 11–51.Google Scholar
2010 Audiovisual genre and the translation of vocatives in interlingual subtitles. In Perspectives on Audiovisual Translation, Łukasz Bogucki and Krzysztof Kredens (eds.). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 61–75.Google Scholar
Bruti, Silvia and Serenella Zanotti.
2012 Orality markers in professional and amateur subtitling: The case of vocatives and address pronouns. In Film Translation from East to West: Dubbing, Subtitling and Didactic Practice, Claudia Buffagni and Beatrice Garzelli (eds.). Bern: Peter Lang, 167–193.Google Scholar
Bubel, Claudia M.
2006 The linguistic construction of character relations in TV drama: Doing friendship in Sex and the City. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
2008 Film audiences as overhearers. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Relationship impression formation: How viewers know people on the screen are friends. In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 225–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary.
2011 Race and the re-embodied voice in Hollywood film. Language and Communication 31 (3): 255–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary and Qiuana Lopez.
2011 Performing blackness, forming whiteness: Linguistic minstrelsy in Hollywood film. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15 (5): 680–706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carney, Ray and Leonard Quart.
2000 The Films of Mike Leigh: Embracing the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E.
2010 Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse and Communication 4 (2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael, Catrin Norrby and Jane Warren.
2009 Language and Human Relations: Styles of Address in Contemporary Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunkling, Leslie.
1990 A Dictionary of Epithets and Terms of Address. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne and Diana Slade.
1997 Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Forchini, Pierfranca.
2012 Movie Language Revisited: Evidence from Multi-Dimensional Analysis and Corpora. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Formentelli, Maicol.
2007 The vocative mate in contemporary English: A corpus-based study. In Language Resources and Linguistic Theory, Andrea Sansò (ed.). Milano: Franco Angeli, 180–199.Google Scholar
2009 Address strategies in a British academic setting. Pragmatics 19 (2): 179–196. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freddi, Maria and Maria Pavesi.
2009 The Pavia Corpus of Film Dialogue: Research rationale and methodology. In Analysing Audiovisual Dialogue: Linguistic and Translational Insights, Maria Freddi and Maria Pavesi (eds.). Bologna: CLUEB, 95–100.Google Scholar
2011 Further insights into corpora and AVT: Developing a corpus of film dialogue. Paper presented at the 4th International Media for All Conference “Audiovisual Translation: Taking Stock”, London, 28 June-1 July 2011.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness.
1990 He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gramley, Stephan and Kurt-Michael Pätzold.
2004 A Survey of Modern English. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michael and Suzanne Carroll.
1978 Language and Situation: Language Varieties and their Social Contexts. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Guillot, Marie-Noelle.
2010 Film subtitles from a cross-cultural pragmatics perspective: Issues of linguistic and cultural representations. The Translator 16 (1): 67–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heyd, Theresa.
2010 How you guys doin’? Staged orality and emerging plural address in the television series Friends. American Speech 85 (1): 33–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet.
2001 An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam and Dariusz Galasiński.
2000 Vocative address forms and ideological legitimisation in political debates. Discourse Studies 2 (1): 65–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine.
2008 Le fonctionnement des termes d’adresse dans certaines situations de parole publique (petits commerces, débats médiatiques). In Atti del 70 Congresso dell’Associazione Italiana di Linguistica Applicata [AitLA], Cristina Bosisio, Bona Cambiagli, Emanuela Piemontese and Francesca Santulli (eds.). Perugia, Italy: Guerra Edizioni, 67–88.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F.
2004 Dude. American Speech 79 (3): 281–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozloff, Sarah.
2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey.
1999 The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Out of Corpora: Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgård and Signe Oksefjell (eds.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 107–118.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael J. and Anne O’Keeffe.
2003 “What’s in a name?”: Vocatives in casual conversation and radio phone-in calls. In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, Pepi Leistyna and Charles F. Meyer (eds.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 153–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally.
2003 “What’s in a name?”: Social labelling and gender practices. In The Handbook of Language and Gender, Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 69–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Thomas E.
2002 A new look at address in American English: The rules have changed. Names 50 (1): 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. and Claudia Bubel.
2009 Direct address as a resource of humor. In Humor in Interaction, Neal R. Norrick and Delia Chiaro (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 29–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Michael P.
1998 Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Palma-Fahey, María.
2011 Exploring the representation of orality: The use of vocatives in two Spanish-speaking films, Machuca and Volver. Sociolinguistic Studies 5 (1): 103–126.Google Scholar
Pavesi, Maria.
1996 L’allocuzione nel doppiaggio dall’inglese all’italiano. In Traduzione multimediale per il cinema, la televisione e la scena, Christine Heiss and Rosa Maria Bollettieri Bosinelli (eds.). Bologna: CLUEB, 117–130.Google Scholar
2005 La traduzione filmica: Aspetti del parlato doppiato dall’inglese all’italiano. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
2012 The enriching functions of address shift in film translation. In Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility at the Crossroads, Aline Remael, Pilar Orero and Mary Carroll (eds.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 335–356.Google Scholar
Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi (
eds) 2011. Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poynton, Cate.
1984 Names as vocatives: Forms and functions. Nottingham Linguistics Circular 131: 1–34.Google Scholar
1989a Terms of address in Australian English. In Australian English: The Language of a New Society, Peter Collins and David Blair (eds.). St. Lucia: University of Queensland Press, 55–69.Google Scholar
1989b Language and Gender: Making the Difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quaglio, Paulo.
2009 Television Dialogue: The Sitcom Friends vs. Natural Conversation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rendle-Short, Johanna.
2007 “Catherine, you’re wasting your time”: Address terms within the Australian political interview. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (9): 1503–1525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The address term mate in Australian English: Is it still a masculine term? Australian Journal of Linguistics 19 (2): 245–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Martín, María Elena.
2010 Comparing parts of speech and semantic domains in the BNC and a micro-corpus of movies: Is film language the ‘real thing’? In Corpus Linguistics in Language Teaching, Tony Harris and María Moreno Jaén (eds.). Bern: Peter Lang, 147–175.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Martín, María Elena and María Moreno Jaén.
2009 Teaching conversation through films: A comparison of conversational features and collocations in the BNC and a micro-corpus of movies. The International Journal of Learning 16 (7): 445–458.Google Scholar
Rossi, Fabio.
1999 Le parole dello schermo: Analisi linguistica del parlato di sei film dal 1948 al 1957. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2011 Discourse analysis of film dialogue: Italian comedy between linguistic realism and pragmatic non-realism. In Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, Roberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek and Fabio Rossi (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins, 21–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rühlemann, Christoph.
2007 Conversation in Context: A Corpus-Driven Approach. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Sutton, Laurel A.
1995 Bitches and skankly hobags: The place of women in contemporary slang. In Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, Kira Hall and Mary Bucholtz (eds.). London and New York: Routledge, 279–296.Google Scholar
Szarkowska, Agnieszka.
2010 Why are some vocatives not omitted in subtitling? A study based on three selected Polish soaps broadcast on TV Polonia. In Perspectives on Audiovisual Translation, Łukasz Bogucki and Krzysztof Kredens (eds.). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 77–92.Google Scholar
Taylor, Christopher.
1999 Look who’s talking: An analysis of film dialogue as a variety of spoken discourse. In Massed Medias: Linguistic Tools for Interpreting Media Discourse, Linda Lombardo, Louann Haarman, John Morley and Christopher Taylor (eds.). Milano: LED Edizioni Universitarie, 247–278.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie.
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weatherall, Ann.
1996 Language about women and men: An example from popular culture. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15 (1): 59–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa and Joan Manes.
1980 Don’t ‘dear’ me! In Women and Language in Literature and Society, Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker and Nelly Furman (eds.). New York: Praeger Publishers, 79–92.Google Scholar
Zago, Raffaele.
2011 The pragmatic functions of vocatives in a corpus of British and American films. Poster presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Conference , Manchester, 3–8 July 2011.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M.
1974 “Hey, Whatsyourname!”. In Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Michael W. La Galy, Robert A. Fox and Anthony Bruck (eds.). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 787–801.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Bączkowska, Anna
2022. Forms of Address in Polish Nonprofessional Subtitles. In Language Use, Education, and Professional Contexts [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Formentelli, Maicol & John Hajek
2022. Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 631 ff. DOI logo
Formentelli, Maicol & Maria Pavesi
2022. The pragmatic functions of tu and lei in films: Converging patterns of address across translated and original Italian dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 201 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Galiano, Liviana & Alfonso Semeraro
2023. Part-of-Speech and Pragmatic Tagging of a Corpus of Film Dialogue: A Pilot Study. Corpus Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Ghia, Elisa
2019. (Dis)aligning across different linguacultures: Pragmatic questions from original to dubbed film dialogue . Multilingua 38:5 ► pp. 583 ff. DOI logo
Ghia, Elisa
2019. Chapter 10. Representing orality through questions in original and translated film dialogue. In Reassessing Dubbing [Benjamins Translation Library, 148], ► pp. 212 ff. DOI logo
Meister, Lova
2016. The T/V dilemma: Forms of address as a stylistic resource in English-Swedish subtitling. Perspectives 24:4 ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Minutella, Vincenza
2021. Americans, Brits, Aussies, Etc.: Native Varieties of English in Italian Dubbing. In (Re)Creating Language Identities in Animated Films, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Moyna, María Irene, Bettina Kluge & Horst J. Simon
2019. Address and address research. In It’s not all about you [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M.
2023. A syntactic and pragmatic study of nominal vocatives in the Twitter exchanges of rappers’ fans. Journal of Pragmatics 207 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Klaus P. & María Elena Placencia
2017. (Im)politeness and Regional Variation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 539 ff. DOI logo
Urichuk, Matthew & Verónica Loureiro-Rodríguez
2019. Brocatives. In It’s not all aboutyou [Topics in Address Research, 1], ► pp. 356 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad [Topics in Address Research, 3], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.