Dialogic elements are considered to play a crucial role in text construction, but little has been revealed concerning how these elements interact with other resources to construct text. This paper explores the text-organizing function of heteroglossic resources quantitatively by focusing on different ideological stances that thesis writers take, namely, the traditional or postmodern stance they take toward history writing. In this study, I demonstrate that traditional and postmodern theses vary significantly in the way they create dialogic spaces. The analysis further reveals that the different dialogic strategies they employ are manifested in the larger textual organization, which demonstrates that dialogic resources interact with text-organizing resources in the construction of text. Keywords: dialogism; corpus linguistics; English for Academic Purposes; history discourse; interactions between multiple resources
2005Purposive environments: Engaging students in the values and practices of history. Higher Education 49 (3): 319-343.
Attridge, Derek
1987Language as history/History as language: Saussure and the romance of etymology. In Poststructuralism and the Question of History, Derek Attridge, Geoff Benningten and Robert Yeung (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 183-211.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M
1981The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bednarek, Monika
2006Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.
1988Lyotard: Writing the Event. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bondi, Marina
2005Metadiscursive practices in academic discourse: Variations across genres and disciplines. In Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspectives on Academic Genres, Julia Bamford and Marina Bondi (eds.). Tübingen: Niemeyer, 3-30.
Booth, Alan
2003Teaching History at University: Enhancing Learning and Understanding. London and New York: Routledge.
Bunton, David
1998Linguistic and textual problems in PhD and MPhil thesis: An analysis of genre moves and metatext. PhD thesis, University of Hong Kong.
Casanave, Christine
2010Taking risks?: A case study of three doctoral students writing qualitative dissertations at an American university in Japan. Journal of Second Language Writing 19 (1): 1-16.
Chafe, Wallace
1986Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols (eds.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 261-72.
Chatman, Seymour
1978Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Coffin, Caroline
2010Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation. London: Continuum.
Collingwood, Robin
1946The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1985Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Studies in Mass Communication 2 (2): 91-114.
Halliday, M. A. K
1981Text semantics and clause grammar: Some patterns of realization. In The Seventh LACUS Forum, James Copeland and Phillip Davis (eds.). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press, 31-59.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruquiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M. A. K. and James Martin
1993Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd revised ed. London: Edward Arnold.
Hodge, Bob
1995Monstrous knowledge: Doing PhDs in the new humanities. Australian Universities’ Review 38 (2): 35-39.
Hood, Susan
2010Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hunston, Susan
1994Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Advances in Written Text Analysis. Malcolm Coulthard (ed.). London: Routledge, 191-218.
Hunston, Susan
2000Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 176-207.
Hyland, Ken
2004Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, Ken
2005Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173-192.
Hyland, Ken
2009Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.
Ivanič, Roz. and David Camps
2001I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Voice in L2 Writing 10 (1-2): 3-33.
2003Reflexivity, relationism and research. Space and Culture 6 (1): 52-65.
Mazzi, Davide
2012Analogy in history: A corpus-based study. In Exploring Argumentative Contexts, Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 115-133.
Munslow, Alun
1997Deconstructing History. London: Routledge.
O’Donnell, Michael
2008UAM Corpus Tool. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, [URL].
Palmer, Frank
1986Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paltridge, Brian
2002Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes 21 (2): 125-143.
Perkins, Michael
1983Modal Expressions in English. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Poynton, Cate
1993Grammar, language and the social: Poststructuralism and systemic functional linguistics. Social Semiotics 3 (1): 1-21.
Prior, Paul
1998Writing/Disciplinarity: A Sociohistoric Account of Literate Activity in the Academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prost, Antoine
1988Les mots. In Pour Une Histoire Politique, René Rémond (ed.). Paris: Seuil, 255-287.
R Core Team
2013R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, [URL].
Von Ranke, Leopold
1952Histories of the Latin and German Nations from 1494 to 1514. London: Longman.
Samraj, Betty
2005An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 24 (2): 141-156.
Sheldon, Elena
2009From one I to another: Discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles. English for Specific Purposes 28 (4): 251-265.
Silver, Marc
2003The stance of stance: A critical look at ways stance is expressed and modeled in academic discourse. Evaluation in Academic Discourse 2 (4): 359-374.
Southgate, Beverley
2003Postmodernism in History: Fear or Freedom? London: Routledge.
Starfield, Sue and Louise Ravelli
2006“The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in new humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (3): 222-243.
Swales, John M
1990Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, John M
2004Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Geoff and Jianglin Zhou
2000Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. In Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 121-141.
Thompson, Paul
2005Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4 (4): 307-323.
Toolan, Michael
2006Part of the meaning/history of Euro: Integrational corpus linguistics. In Language and History, Nigel Love (ed.). London: Routledge, 172-187.
Tosh, John
2006The Pursuit of History: Aims, Methods and New Directions in the Study of Modern History. London: Longman.
White, Hayden V
1973Metahistory : The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Young, Robert
1990White Mythologies: Writing History and the West. London: Routledge.
2014. On the function of stance-neutral formulations: Apparent neutrality as a powerful stance constructing resource. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 16 ► pp. 81 ff.
Sawaki, Tomoko
2016. Revisiting Structuralism. In Analysing Structure in Academic Writing, ► pp. 69 ff.
Sawaki, Tomoko
2016. The Binary Model. In Analysing Structure in Academic Writing, ► pp. 99 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.