Article published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 7:2 (2014) ► pp. 215248
Primary Sources

Primary Sources

Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): http://​corpus​.byu​.edu​/coca.
Culicover, Peter W. and Ray Jackendoff
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Same-Except: A domain general cognitive relation and how language expresses it. Language 88 (2): 305-340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressen-Hammouda, Dacia
2008From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes 27 (2): 233-252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
2007Discovering Syntax: Clause Structures of English, German and Romance. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2008Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 84 (1): 8-28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J.
2007What is optimality theory? Linguistics Department Faculty Publication Series. Paper 93. http://​scholarworks​.umass​.edu​/linguist​_faculty​_pubs​/93 (last accessed on 14 April 2014).
Peeters, Bert
2000Does cognitive linguistics live up to its name? In Language and Ideology, Vol. I, René Dirven, Bruce Hawkins and Esra Sandikcioglu (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 83-106.Google Scholar
Seuren, Pieter
2006Early formalization tendencies in 20th-century American linguistics. In History of the Language Sciences: An International Handbook on the Evolution of the Study of Language from the Beginnings to the Present, Sylvain Auroux, E. F. K. Koerner, Hans-Josef Niederehe and Kees Versteegh (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2026-2034.Google Scholar
Skehan, Peter
1995Analysability, accessibility, and ability for use. In Principle & Practice in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson, Guy Cook and Barbara Seidlhofer (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 91-106.Google Scholar

References

Buchler, Justus
(ed.) 1955Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2009Genitives and proper names in constructional blends. In New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (Human Cognitive Processing 24), Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 161-181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: The Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. and Collin Baker
2009A frames approach to semantic analysis. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 313-339.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goossens, Louis
1990Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 323-340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Julia Berenike
2013Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. PhD dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.
Hyland, Ken
2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen S.
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lipson, Charles
2006Cite Right: A Quick Guide to Citation Styles—MLA, APA, Chicago, the Sciences, Professions, and More. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1995Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12: 109-132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe
2005The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. In Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction (Cognitive Linguistics Research 32), Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 353-386.Google Scholar
2006Metonymy as a usage event. In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (Applications in Cognitive Linguistics 1), Gitte Kristiansen, Michel Achard, René Dirven and Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (eds.). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 147-185.Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Günter Radden
2005Metonymy. In Handbook of Pragmatics 2003-2005, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe and Linda L. Thornburg
1998A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30(6): 755-769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999The potentiality for actualtiy metonymy in English and Hungarian. In Metonymy in Language and Thought (Human Cognitive Processing 4), Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günter Radden (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 333-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Introduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing (Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 113), Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. metaphorik.de 6: 91-116.Google Scholar
2007Metonymy. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 236-263.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2004Where does metonymy stop? Senses, facets, and active zones. Metaphor and Symbol 19 (4): 245-264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, Günter and Zoltán Kövecses
2007Towards a theory of metonymy. In The Cognitive Linguistics Reader, Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen and Jörg Zinken (eds.). London and Oakville, CT: Equinox Publishing, 335-359.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter and Klaus-Uwe Panther
2010Metonymy. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, Patrick C. Hogan (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 501-502.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco J.
2000The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective, Antonio Barcelona (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109-132.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5: 1-23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena
2008Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, Gerard J.
2007Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage: A Methodological Analysis of Theory and Research (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr and Trijntje Pasma
2010A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 14). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990/2001Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul
2005Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4: 307-323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark
1987Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, and Criticism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Beatrice
2004Anaphoric pronouns of metonymic expressions. metaphorik.de 7: 105-114.Google Scholar
White, Howard D.
2004Citation analysis and discourse analysis revisited. Applied Linguistics 25: 89-116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Michael
2003Metaphor and economics: The case of growth. English for Specific Purposes 22 (2): 131-151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szabó
2017. On constructional blocking of metonymies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:1  pp. 183 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.