Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 8:2 (2015) ► pp.207–235

A multifactorial approach to gerundial and to-infinitival verb-complementation patterns in native and non-native English

This multifactorial corpus-based study focuses on verb-complementation constructions (Marcus started to draw a picture vs. Marcus started drawing a picture) and contrasts 3,119 occurrences of gerundial and to-infinitival constructions across native and non-native (ESL) English varieties. Using logistic regression modeling, I analyze how grammatical contexts constrain the syntactic choices of American and Hong Kong English speakers. The regression model reveals a level of complexity in the uses of gerundial/to-infinitival complements that had so far remained unnoticed. Specifically, speakers make syntactic decisions based on comprehensive grammatical contexts rather than single isolated semantic parameters (as previously reported). Further, for the two types of speakers different grammatical features play an influential role in the association of a given predicate with a particular complement type. This suggests that the two speaker populations do not share the same abstract knowledge of the semantic and morpho-syntactic constraints associated with each of the investigated type of complementation. Ultimately, this study shows that combining cognitively oriented theoretical frameworks with rigorous empirical corpus approaches helps distinguish what motivates native and ESL speakers’ syntactic choices.
Keywords: multifactorial approach, native vs. non-native English varieties, gerundial vs. to-infinitival complementation constructions, logistic regression
Published online: 3 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.8.2.04des
References (50)
Arppe, Antti. 2008. Univariate, Bivariate and Multivariate Methods in Corpus-based Lexicography: A Study of Synonymy. Ph.D. dissertation. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. ­Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2 (2): 119–127.Google Scholar
Bourke, James Mannes. 2007. Verbal complementation: A pedagogical challenge. Reflections on English Language Teaching 6 (1): 35–50.Google Scholar
Bruthiaux, Paul. 2003. Squaring the circles: Issues in modeling English worldwide. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13 (2): 159–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burnham, Kenneth P. & David R. Anderson. 2004. Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods and Research 331: 261–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawley, Michael J. 2007. The R Book. Chichester, England: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Deshors, Sandra C. 2012. A multifactorial study of the uses of may and can in French-English interlanguage. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sussex.
. 2014a. A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World-Wide 35 (3): 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. Constructing meaning in L2 discourse: The case of modal verbs and sequential dependencies. In Subjectivity and Epistemicity: Stance Strategies in Discourse and Narration, Dylan Glynn & Mette Sjölin (eds.). Lund: Lund University Press, 329–348.Google Scholar
. 2015. A multifactorial approach to linguistic structure in L2 spoken and written registers. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11 (1): 19–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2013. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar & Antti Arppe. 2013. Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics 24 (2): 221–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick. C. 2008. Phraseology: The periphery and the heart of language. In Phraseology in Learning and Teaching, Fanny Meunier & Sylviane Granger (eds.). Amsterdam and ­Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Nuria Sagarra. 2011. Learned attention in adult language acquisition: A replication and generalization study and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33 (4): 589–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles & Zoë Field. 2012. Discover Statistics Using R. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (5): 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Devin Casenhiser. 2006. English constructions. In Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts & April McMahon (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 343–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle ­Placement. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Sandra C. Deshors. 2014. Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora 9 (1): 109–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1 (1): 130–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on alternations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanie Wulff. 2009. Psycholinguistic and corpus-linguistic evidence for L2 constructions. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 71: 163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. (ed.). 1982. The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. University of Illinois Press: Urbana and Chicago.Google Scholar
Kaleta, Agnieszka. 2012. The English gerund vs. the to-infinitive: The case of aspectual constructions. Selected Papers from UK-CLA Meetings 11: 323–341. Available at <[URL]> (last accessed on 26 June 2014).Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2000. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Li, Eden & Ahmar Mahboob. 2012. English Today: Forms, Functions, and Uses. Hong Kong: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Michael & Ronald Carter. 2001. Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. In New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, Eli Hinkle & Sandra Fotos (eds.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 51–75.Google Scholar
Martinez-Garcia, Maria T. & Stefanie Wulff. 2012. Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22 (2): 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 271: 147–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Marianne Hundt. 2011. Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato & Marco Schilk. 2008. Verb-complementational profiles across varieties of English: Comparing verb classes in Indian English and British English. In The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present, Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta & Minna Korhonen (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 163–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Christopher, Sach Mukherjee, Marco Schilk & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2013. Statistical analysis of varieties of English. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1761: 777–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 1985. Complementation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Complex Constructions (vol. 21), Timothy Shopen (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 42–110.Google Scholar
Olavarría de Ersson, Eugenia & Philip Shaw. 2003. Verb complementation patterns in Indian standard English. English World-Wide 24 (2): 137–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at <[URL]> (last accessed on 19 December 2014).
Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 205–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilk, Marco, Tobias Bernaisch & Joybrato Mukherjee. 2012. Mapping unity and diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar. In Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes, Marianne Hundt & Ulrike Gut (eds.). Amsterdam and ­Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilk, Marco, Joybrato Mukherjee, Christopher Nam & Sach Mukherjee. 2013. Complementation of ditransitive verbs in South Asian Englishes: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9 (2): 187–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael B. & Joyce Escobedo. 2002. The semantics of to-infinitival vs. -ing verb complement constructions in English. In Proceedings from the Main Session in the Chicago Linguistics Society’s Thirty-Seventh Meeting, Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston & Sylvain Neuvel (eds.). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 549–564.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy 66 (2): 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, Frederick T. 1956. Gerund versus infinitive. English Language Teaching 111: 11–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries. 2011. Corpus-driven methods for assessing complexity and accuracy in learner production. In Researching Task Complexity: Task Demands, ­Task-based Language Learning and Performance, Peter Robinson (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 61–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Friginal, Eric, Ashleigh Cox & Rachelle Udell
2023. Corpus Linguistics and Writing Instruction. In Demystifying Corpus Linguistics for English Language Teaching, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Vergaro, Carla
2023. Linguistic and pragmatic ways of committing oneself. Pragmatics & Cognition 30:1 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Weilu, Jijun Wang & Manfu Duan
2023. Corpus-Based Lexical Development of EFL Writing. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Diversified Education and Social Development (DESD 2022), ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Tyrkkö, Jukka & Juhani Rudanko
2022. Grammar, text type, and diachrony as factors influencing complement choice in historical American English. In Earlier North American Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G66], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8 ► pp. 1151 ff. DOI logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2023. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica 95:1 ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Conclusion. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. New Light on -Ing Complements of Prevent, with Recent Data from Large Corpora. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.