Previous studies indicate that speakers signal the informational status of referents through a combination of intonation, word order and lexical realisation. In this paper, I argue for a non-binary view of information structure with referents being (1) hearer and discourse new, (2) discourse new but hearer given and (3) hearer and discourse given. Thus there can be no simple one-to-one relationship between information structure, lexical realisation and accenting. In the spoken data examined, evidence was found to substantiate a relationship between referential distance and lexical realisation but not between referential distance and tonic accenting. Tonic accents signal speakers’ subjective projection of the importance of a referent but the exact informational meaning signalled by the referent depends on a combination of tonic accent, tone choice, key, linear position and lexical realisation.
2003Broad focus across sentence types in Greek. Paper presented at the
8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH 2003 – INTERSPEECH 2003)
, Geneva, Switzerland, 1–4 September 2003. [URL] (Last accessed on 28 December 2015).
Baumann, Stefan & Martine Grice
2006The intonation of accessibility. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 1636–1657.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenick
n.d. Praat doing Phonetics by Computer. Computer programme Version 5.3.52.
Branigan, Holly P., Martin J. Pickering & Mikihiro Tanaka
2008Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 1181: 172–189.
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2013Order of subject, object and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (Last accessed on 9 November 2015).
1974Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to the problems of functional sentence perspective. In Papers on FSP, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia Press, 11–37.
1989Degrees of communicative dynamism and degrees of prosodic prominence weight. Brno Studies in English 181: 21–66.
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1995Retrievability span in Functional Sentence Perspective. Brno Studies in English 211: 17–45.
Fletcher, Janet, Lesley Stirling, Ilana Muhin & Roger Wales
2002Intonational rises and dialog acts in the Australian English map task. Language and Speech 45 (3): 226–253.
1989Information structure in English conversation: The Given-New distinction revisited. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 31: 129–147.
1975A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis. The Hague: Mouton.
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2006Focus in the languages of Europe. In Pragmatic Organisation of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 121–124.
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg
1990The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in Communication, Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan & Martha E. Pollack (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 271–311.
1981Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole, (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 223–255.
1992Subjects, definiteness and information status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-raising Text, William. C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 295–325.
1981Two chapters on scene. Brno studies in English 141: 81–92.
1983Thematic elements. Brno studies in English 321: 49–85.
1984Message and Emphasis: On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longman.
1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.
1990The informational component. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. Published 1993. New York: Garland Press.
1887The Order of Words in Ancient Languages Compared with that of Modern Languages. Translated by Charles W Super. Boston: Ginn & Co.
Wells, Bill & Sue Peppé
1996Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn taking in English dialects. In Prosody in Conversation, Elisabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–130.
Cited by 8 other publications
Bartlett, Tom & Gerard O’Grady
2019. Language characterology and textual dynamics: a crosslinguistic exploration in English and Scottish Gaelic. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:2 ► pp. 124 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.