Article published in:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 3355


Berry, Margaret
1981aSystemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 120–145.Google Scholar
1981bTowards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 2: 23–32.Google Scholar
1981cPolarity, ellipticity, elicitation and propositional development, their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange: A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 10 (1): 36–63.Google Scholar
1987Is teacher an unanalysed concept? In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Volume 1: Theory and Description, M.A.K. Halliday & Robin Fawcett (eds). London: Pinter, 41–63.Google Scholar
2015aExchange structure revisited. Paper presented to research groups at the universities of Cardiff (2014) and with revisions Portsmouth (2015).
2015bChallenging moves and supporting moves in discourse. Paper presented at the International Functional Systemic Congress , Aachen, July 2015.
In preparation. Exchange Structure and Systemic Functional Linguistics.
Burton, Deirdre
1980Dialogue and Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm & David Brazil
1979Exchange Structure (Discourse Analysis Monographs 5). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, Martin Montgomery & David Brazil
1981Developing a description of spoken discourse. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1–50.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1974Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia, 106–128.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
2012What drives sequences? Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
1997Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1986On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective. In Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches, Charles Raymond Cooper & Sidney Greenbaum (eds). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 40–71.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1979Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: A Festschrift for William Haas, David Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–79. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On Grammar, Volume 1 of Collected Works of Michael Halliday, Jonathan Webster (ed.). London: Continuum, 196–218.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiesssen
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1972Side sequences. In Studies in Social Interaction, David Sudnow (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 294–338.Google Scholar
Martin, James
1985Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 1, James Benson & William Greaves (eds). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 248–274.Google Scholar
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James, Michele Zappavigna & Paul Dwyer
2009Negotiating shame: Exchange and genre structure in youth justice conferencing. In Studies in Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, Ahmar Mahboob & Caroline Lipovsky (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 41–73. Reprinted in Martin, James. 2012. Forensic Linguistics, Volume 8 of Collected Works of James Martin, Wang Zhenhua (ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 102–128.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2009Knowledge moves in conversational exchanges: Revisiting the concept of primary vs. secondary knowers. Functions of Language 16 (2): 225–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
1999Context in dynamic modelling. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rose, David
2014Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 1 (11): 1–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1972Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, David Sudnow (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 75–119.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel & Harvey Sacks
1973Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7 (4): 289–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1987The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Bartlett, Tom
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics,  pp. 285 ff. Crossref logo
Berry, Margaret
2020. Inequalities in status: How do they show in discourse and what can be done about them?. Lingua  pp. 102924 ff. Crossref logo
Butler, Christopher S.
2019. Does functional linguistics have a ‘fundamental unity’?. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
Davidse, Kristin, Lise Fontaine & Miriam Taverniers
2019. Introduc​tion. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Elorza, Izaskun, Jorge Arús-Hita & Tom Bartlett
2021. SFL approaches to language dynamics and contrast. Lingua  pp. 103098 ff. Crossref logo
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Gerard O’Grady*
2019. English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 86 ff. Crossref logo
Martin, James R.
2019. Once more with feeling. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 1:2  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
O’Donnell, Mick
2020. Dynamic modelling of context: Field, Tenor and Mode revisited. Lingua  pp. 102952 ff. Crossref logo
O’Grady, Gerard
2020. Intonation and exchange: A dynamic and metafunctional view. Lingua  pp. 102794 ff. Crossref logo
O’Grady, Gerard
2020. Is there a role for prosody within register studies. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 2:1  pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
Yuan, Chuanyou & Xing Luo
2021. A negotiation analysis of risk assessment in community correction from the perspective of exchange structure. Language and Dialogue 11:2  pp. 200 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2020. Dialogic positioning in Khorchin Mongolian: The temporal and spatial dimensions of propositional engagement in conversations. Lingua 244  pp. 102920 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Dynamism in knowledge exchanges: developing move systems based on Khorchin Mongolian interactions. Discourse Studies 23:3  pp. 386 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Tense in Khorchin Mongolian: an interpersonal perspective. Language Sciences 85  pp. 101371 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.