This paper considers the meaning of the term ‘dynamism’ in relation to systemic functional linguistic accounts of exchange structure, in which a distinction is often drawn between ‘dynamic’ accounts and ‘synoptic’ accounts. The paper then discusses and develops a model of exchange structure which is intended to be dynamic, focusing in turn on ‘supporting moves’, ‘queries’ and ‘challenges’. The eventual aim is that the model should be applicable to various forms of discourse, bringing out the differences between them and relating these to the contexts of situation. Applications to be particularly considered in the present paper are to classroom discourse and to a sociologically interesting form of discourse such as interviews with young offenders.
1981aSystemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 120–145.
Berry, Margaret
1981bTowards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21: 23–32.
Berry, Margaret
1981cPolarity, ellipticity, elicitation and propositional development, their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange: A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 10 (1): 36–63.
Berry, Margaret
1987Is teacher an unanalysed concept? In New Developments in Systemic Linguistics, Volume 1: Theory and Description, M.A.K. Halliday & Robin Fawcett (eds). London: Pinter, 41–63.
Berry, Margaret
2015aExchange structure revisited. Paper presented to
research groups at the universities of Cardiff (2014) and with revisions Portsmouth
(20151).
Berry, Margaret
2015bChallenging moves and supporting moves in discourse. Paper presented at the
International Functional Systemic Congress
, Aachen, July 2015.
Berry, Margaret
In preparation. Exchange Structure and Systemic Functional Linguistics.
Burton, Deirdre
1980Dialogue and Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Coulthard, Malcolm & David Brazil
1979Exchange Structure (Discourse Analysis Monographs 5). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Coulthard, Malcolm, Martin Montgomery & David Brazil
1981Developing a description of spoken discourse. In Studies in Discourse Analysis, Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1–50.
Daneš, František
1974Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia, 106–128.
Drew, Paul
2012What drives sequences?Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 61–68.
1986On the dynamics of written communication in the light of the theory of functional sentence perspective. In Studying Writing: Linguistic Approaches, Charles Raymond Cooper & Sidney Greenbaum (eds). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 40–71.
Halliday, M.A.K
1979Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: A Festschrift for William Haas, David Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–79. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. 2002. On Grammar, Volume 1 of Collected Works of Michael Halliday, Jonathan Webster (ed.). London: Continuum, 196–218.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiesssen
2014An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. London: Routledge.
Jefferson, Gail
1972Side sequences. In Studies in Social Interaction, David Sudnow (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 294–338.
Martin, James
1985Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 11, James Benson & William Greaves (eds). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 248–274.
2009Negotiating shame: Exchange and genre structure in youth justice conferencing. In Studies in Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, Ahmar Mahboob & Caroline Lipovsky (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 41–73. Reprinted in Martin, James. 2012. Forensic Linguistics, Volume 8 of Collected Works of James Martin, Wang Zhenhua (ed.). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 102–128.
1999Context in dynamic modelling. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63–99.
Rose, David
2014Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics 1 (11): 1–32.
Schegloff, Emanuel
1972Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Studies in Social Interaction, David Sudnow (ed.). New York: The Free Press, 75–119.
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson & Harvey Sacks
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361–382.
Schegloff, Emanuel & Harvey Sacks
1973Opening up closings. Semiotica, 7 (4): 289–327.
Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Ventola, Eija
1987The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
Cited by
Cited by 18 other publications
Bartlett, Tom
2019. Models of Discourse in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 285 ff.
Berry, Margaret
2021. Inequalities in status: How do they show in discourse and what can be done about them?. Lingua 261 ► pp. 102924 ff.
2020. Dialogic positioning in Khorchin Mongolian: The temporal and spatial dimensions of propositional engagement in conversations. Lingua 244 ► pp. 102920 ff.
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Dynamism in knowledge exchanges: developing move systems based on Khorchin Mongolian interactions. Discourse Studies 23:3 ► pp. 386 ff.
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Tense in Khorchin Mongolian: an interpersonal perspective. Language Sciences 85 ► pp. 101371 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.