Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 7798
References
Auer, Peter
2005Delayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex conversation. In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brazil, David
1995A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Ray
2011Interruption and uncooperativeness in academic ELF group work: An application of Linear Unit Grammar. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki. [URL] (Last accessed on 18 May 2015).
2013On the other side: Formulaic organizing chunks in spoken and written academic EFL. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2 (2): 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Preliminary findings of the CLUMP project: Spontaneous chunking of incoming text: Cognitive and communal implications for the linear modeling of language. Paper presented at the ChangE Consortium Workshop , University of Helsinki, 8 June 2015.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
2006Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren
2008A Corpus-Driven Study of Discourse Intonation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater
2015The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, April 14: 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Brian & Michael McCarthy
2015Co-constructed turn-taking. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Ruehlemann (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 430–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Anne-Lise & David Poeppel
2012Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience 15 (4): 511–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John. R.
1957General linguistics and descriptive grammar. In Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press, 216–228.Google Scholar
1968A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In Selected Papers of J.R. Firth, Frank R. Palmer (ed.). London: Longman, 168–205.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov M. Gabbay
2001Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mason, Oliver
2008Stringing together a sentence: Linearity and the lexis-syntax interface. In Language, People, Numbers: Corpus Linguistics and Society, Andrea Gerbig & Oliver Mason (eds). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 231–248. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2009Managing interaction. A linear perspective on interactive speech. In Corpora and Discourse – and Stuff. Papers in Honour of Karin Aijmer, Rhonwen Bowen, Mats Mobärg & Sölve Ohlander (eds). Göteborg: University of Gothenburg, 213–221.Google Scholar
2009/2012Chunking in ELF: Expressions for managing interaction. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (2): 217–233. Reprinted in Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 1, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds). London: Sage, 271–286.Google Scholar
2012aExploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012bLinear Unit Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 3409–3417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna, Svetlana Vetchinnikova & Ray Carey
2015Chunking in language: Units of meaning and processing (CLUMP) project. Paper presented at the ChangE Consortium Workshop , University of Helsinki, 8 June 2015.
McCarthy, Michael J.
2010Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal 1 (1). (Last accessed on 19 January 2016). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A.
1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 631: 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monschau, Jacqueline, Rolf Kreyer & Joybrato Mukherjee
2004Syntax and semantics at tone unit boundaries. Anglia – Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 121 (4): 581–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2001Form and Function of Parasyntactic Presentation Structures. A Corpus-Based Study of Talk Units in Spoken English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William
2005Syntactic Carpentry. An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Language without grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds). New York: Routledge, 139–167.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John & Anna Mauranen
2006Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smart, Cameron
2013The role of discourse reflexivity in a linear description of grammar and discourse: The case of IMDb message boards. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70],  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Mauranen, Anna
2022. Linear Unit Grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 865 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.