Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 7798
References (30)
Auer, Peter
2005Delayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex conversation. In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation, Auli Hakulinen & Margret Selting (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Brazil, David
1995A Grammar of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, Ray
2011Interruption and uncooperativeness in academic ELF group work: An application of Linear Unit Grammar. Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki. [URL] (Last accessed on 18 May 2015).
2013On the other side: Formulaic organizing chunks in spoken and written academic EFL. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 2 (2): 207–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Preliminary findings of the CLUMP project: Spontaneous chunking of incoming text: Cognitive and communal implications for the linear modeling of language. Paper presented at the ChangE Consortium Workshop , University of Helsinki, 8 June 2015.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
2006Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1994Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves & Martin Warren
2008A Corpus-Driven Study of Discourse Intonation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, Morten H. & Nick Chater
2015The now-or-never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, April 14: 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Brian & Michael McCarthy
2015Co-constructed turn-taking. In Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, Karin Aijmer & Christoph Ruehlemann (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 430–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giraud, Anne-Lise & David Poeppel
2012Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience 15 (4): 511–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John. R
1957General linguistics and descriptive grammar. In Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press, 216–228.Google Scholar
1968A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. In Selected Papers of J.R. Firth, Frank R. Palmer (ed.). London: Longman, 168–205.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth, Wilfried Meyer-Viol & Dov M. Gabbay
2001Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mason, Oliver
2008Stringing together a sentence: Linearity and the lexis-syntax interface. In Language, People, Numbers: Corpus Linguistics and Society, Andrea Gerbig & Oliver Mason (eds). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 231–248. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2009Managing interaction. A linear perspective on interactive speech. In Corpora and Discourse – and Stuff. Papers in Honour of Karin Aijmer, Rhonwen Bowen, Mats Mobärg & Sölve Ohlander (eds). Göteborg: University of Gothenburg, 213–221.Google Scholar
2009/2012Chunking in ELF: Expressions for managing interaction. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (2): 217–233. Reprinted in Corpus Linguistics, Vol. 1, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds). London: Sage, 271–286.Google Scholar
2012aExploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-Native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012bLinear Unit Grammar. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, Carol A. Chapelle (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 3409–3417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna, Svetlana Vetchinnikova & Ray Carey
2015Chunking in language: Units of meaning and processing (CLUMP) project. Paper presented at the ChangE Consortium Workshop , University of Helsinki, 8 June 2015.
McCarthy, Michael J
2010Spoken fluency revisited. English Profile Journal 1 (1). (Last accessed on 19 January 2016). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A
1956The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 631: 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monschau, Jacqueline, Rolf Kreyer & Joybrato Mukherjee
2004Syntax and semantics at tone unit boundaries. Anglia – Zeitschrift für englische Philologie 121 (4): 581–609. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2001Form and Function of Parasyntactic Presentation Structures. A Corpus-Based Study of Talk Units in Spoken English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Grady, William
2005Syntactic Carpentry. An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Language without grammar. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition, Peter Robinson & Nick C. Ellis (eds). New York: Routledge, 139–167.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John & Anna Mauranen
2006Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smart, Cameron
2013The role of discourse reflexivity in a linear description of grammar and discourse: The case of IMDb message boards. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Birmingham.
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Mauranen, Anna
2022. Linear Unit Grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ],  pp. 865 ff. DOI logo
Haselow, Alexander
2020. Chapter 8. Local and global structures in discourse and interaction. In Grammar and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing, 70],  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.