Article published in:
EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 14 (2014)
Edited by Leah Roberts, Ineke Vedder and Jan H. Hulstijn
[EUROSLA Yearbook 14] 2014
► pp. 31–64

The effects of time in the development of complexity and accuracy during study abroad

A study of French and Chinese learners of English

| University College Cork
| University College Cork
Reflecting the current age of mammoth globalisation and the desirability of having a second language in today’s world, study abroad (SA) is becoming increasingly popular amongst university students across many disciplines. Moreover, with the EU identifying a target of 20% participation in SA in 2010, the value of this activity is also being recognised on an intergovernmental level. Participants in SA programmes stand to gain not only invaluable experiences, in terms of expanding their social and cultural knowledge, but also in developing their second language (L2). While there now exists a multitude of SLA studies situated within this unique learning context, such studies vary enormously in the duration of their learner-participants’ stay in the target language community. Indeed, a review of the current literature indicates that the duration of SA in the existing research ranges from a couple of weeks to a full year. Given such diversity, it is difficult to draw substantive conclusions on the effect of duration of SA on L2 development, although a limited number of important studies have explored the issue (e.g. Davidson, 2010; Dwyer, 2004; Llanes & Muñoz, 2009; Serrano et al., 2012). Against this background, the current paper reports on a longitudinal study of French and Chinese learners of English over a nine month SA period. Initial, medial and final interview data were analysed in terms of Complexity and Accuracy which are considered two important, and often rivalrous, features of language performance (Ellis & Barkhuizen, 2005). The results of the study point to considerable individual variation, both within individuals (variation across observations) and between individuals (variation across participants) in scope of development, making it difficult to capture language gains in terms of a neat, linear pattern over time.
Published online: 05 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.14.02jen
References

References

Antonakopoulou, E.
2013 “Sociocultural adaptation of U.S. education abroad students in Greece: The effects of program duration and intervention.” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad XXIII: Fall 2013.Google Scholar
Bartning, I.
1997 “L’apprenant dit avancé et son acquisition d’une langue étrangère. Tour d’horizon et esquisse d’une caractérisation de la variété avancée.” Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère 9: 9–50.Google Scholar
2009 “The advanced learner variety: 10 years later.” In The Advanced Learner Variety. The Case of French, F. Myles and E. Labeau (eds.), 11–40. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. and Bofman, T.
1989 “Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11 (1): 17–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiswick, B.R. and Miller, P.W.
2004 “Linguistic distance: A quantitative measure of the distance between English and other languages.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 26 (1): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, E. and DuFon, M.
2006 Language Learners in Study Abroad Contexts. Clevedon / Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Collentine, J.
2004 “The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2): 227–248.Google Scholar
Collentine, J. and Freed, B.
2004 “Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2): 153–171.Google Scholar
Davidson, D.
2010 “Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front.” Foreign Language Annals 43 (1): 6–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W. and Verspoor, M.
2007 “A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10 (1): 7–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K. and Makoni, S.
2005 Language and Aging in Multilingual Societies: Dynamic Perspectives. Clevedon / Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Dechert, H.W., Mohle, D. and Raupach, M.
1984 Second Language Productions. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S.
2006 “Chinese (Mandarin): Phonology.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition, K. Brown (ed.), 351–355. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dwyer, M.
2004 “More is better: The impact of study abroad program duration.” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad X: 151–164.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
2003 Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, P.
2005 Analysing Learner Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freed, B.F.
1991 “ Language learning in a study abroad context: The effects of interactive and non-interactive out-of-class contact on grammatical achievement and oral proficiency.” In Linguistics, Language Teaching and Language Acquisition: The Interdependence of Theory, Practice and Research, J. Alatis (ed.), 459–477. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1995 “What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent?” In Second Language Acquisition in a Study Abroad Context, B.F. Freed (ed.), 123–148. 
Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Freed, B.F., Dewey, D.P., Segalowitz, N. and Halter, R.
2004 “The language contact profile.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26 (2): 349–356.Google Scholar
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A. and Wigglesworth, G.
2000 “Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 354–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K.
1975 “Learning to speak a second language: What exactly does the child learn?” 
In Developmental Psycholinguistics: Theory and Applications, D.P. Dato (ed.), 193–207. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, D.S., Lapkin, S. and Swain, M.
1994 “Impact of a six-month bilingual exchange program: attitudes and achievement.” Report to the Department of the Secretary of State. Toronto: OISE Modern Language Centre.Google Scholar
Herdina, P. and Jessner, U.
2002 A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Clevedon / Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Housen, A. and Kuiken, F.
2009 “Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 30 (4): 461–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I.
2012 Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M.
2005 “Second language acquisition in a study abroad context: A comparative investigation of the effects of study abroad and foreign language instruction on the L2 learner’s grammatical development.” In Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition, A. Housen and M. Pierrard (eds.), 495–530. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011a “Input perspectives on the role of learning context in second language acquisition. An introduction to the special issue.” Input and Learning Context in Second Language Acquisition, Special issue ofInternational Review of Applied Linguistics 49 (3): 71–82.Google Scholar
2011b “Lessons from the world of SLA on the impact of learning context in L2 acquisition. Insights from study abroad research.” In Discours, acquisition et didactique des langues. Les termes d’un dialogue, P. Trévisiol-Okamura and G. Komur-Thilloy (eds.), 87–104. Paris: Orizons.Google Scholar
Ife, A., Vives Boix, G. and Meara, P.
2000 “The impact of study abroad on vocabulary development among different proficient groups.” Spanish Applied Linguistics 4 (1): 55–84.Google Scholar
Isabelli, C.A. and Nishida, C.
2005 “Development of the Spanish subjunctive in a nine month study-abroad setting.” In Selected Proceedings of the 6th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages, D. Eddington (ed.), 78–91. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Keijzer, M.
2001 Representation and Behavior. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W.
1984 “Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation.” In Language in Use, J. Baughand J. Scherzer(eds.), 43–70. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
1978 “An ESL index of development?.” TESOL Quarterly 12 (4): 439–448. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 “Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 18 (2): 141–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective.” In Language Acquisition and Language Socialization: Ecological Perspectives, C. Kramsch (ed.), 33–46. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2006 “The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English.” Applied Linguistics 27 (4): 590–619. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 30 (4): 579–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. and Ellis, R.
2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Oxford: Wiley-­Blackwell.Google Scholar
Llama, R., Cardoso, W. and Collins, L.
2010 “The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology.” International Journal of Multilingualism 7 (1): 39–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llanes, À. and Muñoz, C.
2009 “A short stay abroad: Does it make a difference?” System 37 (3): 353–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Llanes, À.
2011 “The Many Faces of Study Abroad: An Update on the Research on L2 Gains Emerged During a Study Abroad Experience.” International Journal of Multilingualism 8 (3): 189–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The impact of study abroad and age on second language accuracy development.” In Intensive Exposure Experiences in Second Language Learning, C. Muñoz (ed.), 193–212. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Long, M.
1997 “Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner.” Modern Language Journal 81: 318–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K.P.
1992 “Emergence of complexity in phonological development.” In Child Phonological Development, C. Ferguson, L. Menn and C. Stoel-Gammon (eds.), 635–662. 
Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Norris, J.M. and Ortega, L.
2009 “Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity.” Applied Linguistics 30 (4): 555–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. and Byrnes, H.
2008 The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C. and Juan-Garau, M.
2009 “The effects of study abroad (SA) on written performance.” EUROSLA Yearbook 9: 269–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “The effect of context and input conditions on oral and written development: A study abroad perspective.” International Review of Applied Linguistics 49 (2): 157–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., Juan-Garau, M. Mora, J.C. and Valls-Ferrer, M.
2012 “Oral and written development in formal instruction and study abroad: Differential effects of learning context.” In Intensive Exposure Experiences in Second Language Learning, C. Muñoz (ed.), 193–212. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Polat, B. and Kim, Y.
2014 “Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development.” Applied Linguistics 35 (2): 184–207.Google Scholar
Rasouli Khorshidi, H.
2013 “Study abroad and interlanguage pragmatic development in request and apology speech acts among Iranian learners.” English Language Teaching 6 (5): 62–70.Google Scholar
Regan, V.
1998 “Sociolinguistics and language learning in a study abroad context.” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 4 (3): 61–91.Google Scholar
Sasaki, M.
2007 “Effects of study-abroad experiences on EFL writers: a multiple data analysis.” Modern Language Journal 91 (4): 602–620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Changes in English as a foreign language students’ writing over 3.5 years: a sociocognitive account.” In Writing in Foreign Language Contexts: Learning, Teaching, and Research, R. Manchon (ed.), 49–76. Bristol / Toronto: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Serrano.S.
2010 “Learning languages in study abroad and at home contexts: A critical review of comparative studies.” Porta Linguarum 13: 149–163.Google Scholar
Serrano, S., Tragant, E. and Llanes, À.
2012 “A longitudinal analysis of the effects of one year abroad.” Canadian Modern Language Review 68 (2): 138–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
1998 A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Tasks and language performance.” In Researching Pedagogic Tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing, M. Bygate, P. Skehan and M. Swain (eds.), 167–186. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2003 “Task based instruction.” Language Teaching 36: 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis.” Applied Linguistics 30 (4): 510–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. and Foster, P.
1999 “The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings.” Language Learning 49 (1): 93–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 “Cognition and tasks.” In Cognition and Second Language Learning, P. Robinson (ed.), 183–205. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, M., de Bot, K. and Lowie, W.
2004 “Dynamic systems theory and variation: A case study in L2 writing.” In Words in Their Places: A Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie, H. Aertsen, M. Hannay and R. Lyall (eds), 407–421. Amsterdam: Free University Press.Google Scholar
2011 A Dynamic Approach to Second Language Development: Methods and Techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vossensteyn, H., Beerkens, M., Cremonini, L., Besançon, B., Focken, N., Leurs, B., McCoshan, A., Mozuraityte, N., Huisman, J., Souto Otero, M. and de Wit, H.
2010 “Improving the participation in the ERASMUS programme.” In Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies Culture and Education , European Commission, Brussels.
Waldrop, M.M.
1992 Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Wang, W.
2009 “Interlanguage theory and emergentism: Reconciliation in second language developmental index studies.” English Language Teaching 2 (1): 31–36.Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. and Kim, H.-Y.
1998 Second Language Development in Writing. Measures of Fluency, Accuracy and Complexity. University of Hawai’i: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Bartning, Inge, Klara Arvidsson & Fanny Forsberg Lundell
2015. Complexity at the phrasal level in spoken L1 and very advanced L2 French. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 6:2 ► pp. 181 ff. Crossref logo
Borràs, Judith & Àngels Llanes
2021. Re-examining the impact of study abroad on L2 development: a critical overview. The Language Learning Journal 49:5 ► pp. 527 ff. Crossref logo
Dewaele, Livia & Jean-Marc Dewaele
2020. Actual and Self-Perceived Linguistic Proficiency Gains in French during Study Abroad. Languages 6:1 ► pp. 6 ff. Crossref logo
Long, Avizia Y. & Megan Solon
2021. The impact of a short-term stay abroad on L2 Spanish syntactic complexity development in narratives. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 6:1 ► pp. 163 ff. Crossref logo
McManus, Kevin, Rosamond Mitchell & Nicole Tracy-Ventura
2021. A Longitudinal Study of Advanced Learners’ Linguistic Development Before, During, and After Study Abroad. Applied Linguistics 42:1 ► pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Yiran
2019. Changes in interlanguage complexity during study abroad: A meta-analysis. System 80 ► pp. 199 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.