Cover not available
Article published In:
EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 16 (2016)
Edited by Sarah Ann Liszka, Pascale Leclercq, Marion Tellier and Georges Daniel Véronique
[EUROSLA Yearbook 16] 2016
► pp. 85–115

Motivation, ideal self and willingness to communicate as the predictors of observed L2 use in the classroom

Willingness to Communicate (WTC), the most immediate antecedent of actual communication behavior in an L2, is widely believed to facilitate the acquisition of the target language. Higher WTC is generally associated with higher L2 use (MacIntyre, Clément, Dörnyei & Noels 1998), though it has not been empirically tested. This article reports on an attempt to fill this gap by investigating to what degree learners’ self-reported L2 WTC predicts actual L2 use in the classroom. A group of 372 Japanese university EFL learners majoring in science and human arts subjects participated in the study. Students’ oral performance data were collected three times during the group discussions in one academic semester. The number of words each student produced during each discussion was counted. The results of structural equation modelling analyses suggested that self-reported L2 WTC predicted actual L2 use in the classroom. Second, gender differences in L2 use in the language classroom has not been empirically explored in the quantitative studies, therefore, whether L2 WTC would predict observed L2 use equally among males and females, and whether males and females produce equal amount of L2 in the classroom will be explored. Implications of the research findings will be discussed.

Published online: 10 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.16.04mun
References (73)
Ajzen, I
(1988) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
(2005) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. New York, NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., Tajeddin, Z. & Mesbah, Z
(2013) Willingness to Communicate in L2 English: Impact of Learner Variables. RALS, 41, 42–61. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Al-Shehri, A.S
(2009) Motivation and vision: The relation between the ideal L2 self, imagination and visual style. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 164–171). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beatty, M.J. & McCroskey, J.C
(2000) A few comments about communibiology and the nature/nurture question. Communication Education, 49(1), 25–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P.M
(2006) EQS 61 [Computer software]. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T.O. & Basboll, H
(2008).The Danish Communicative Developmental Inventories: Validity and main developmental trends. Journal of child language, 351, 651–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowers, J.M., Perez-Pouchoulen, M., Edwards, N.S. and McCarthy, M.M
(2013) Foxp2 mediates sex differences in ultrasonic vocalization by rat pups and directs order of maternal retrieval. Journal of Neuroscience, 33 (8), 3276–3283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brannon, L
(2015) Gender: Psychological Perspectives. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brizendine, L
(2006) The Female Brain. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
Burman, D.D., Bitan, T. & Booth, J.R
(2008) Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349–1362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canale, M. & Swain, M
(1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 11, 1–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y. & Philp, J
(2006) Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 341, 480–493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clément, R. & Kruidenier, B
(1985) Aptitude, attitude, and motivation in second language proficiency: A test of Clément’s model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41, 21–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Csizér, K. & Kormos, J
(2009) Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behavior: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98–119). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denies, K., Yashima, T. & Janssen, R
(2015) Classroom Versus Societal Willingness to Communicate: Investigating French as a Second Language in Flanders. The Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 718–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z
(1990) Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 401, 46–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Kormos, J
(2000) The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 41, 275–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiore, D.J
(2011) School-community Relations (3rd ed.). Larchmon, NY: Eye on Education.Google Scholar
Fisher, S.E. & Scharff, C
(2009) FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language. Trends in Genetics 251, 166 –177. CrossRef Medline DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, D.R
(2010) Group Dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.C. & Lambert, W.E
(1972) Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gardner, R.C
(1985) Social Psychology and Second Language Learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London, England: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Good, T.L., Sikes, J.N. & Brophy, J.E
(1973) Effects of teacher sex and student sex on classroom interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology 651, 74–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Good, T.L., Cooper, H.M. & Blakey, S.L
(1980) Classroom interaction as a function of teacher expectations, student sex, and time of year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 721, 378–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Y
(2002) Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29–70.Google Scholar
Hsu, C.F
(2007) A cross-cultural comparison of communication orientations between Americans and Taiwanese. Communication Quarterly 55(3). 359–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huttenlocher, J.H.W., Bryk, A., Seltzer, M. & Lyons, T
(1991) Early vocabulary growth: relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 271, 236–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J.S. & Linn, M.C
(1988) Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1041, 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D
(1972) On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride & J. Holmes, (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
Jing, L
(2013) Research on English majors’ willingness to communicate inside classroom. Sino-US English Teaching, 10(8), 615–620. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Kang, S
(2005) Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 331, 277–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimura, D
(2000) Sex and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book/MIT Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, Lynne
(2008) Research Methodology on Language Development from a Complex Systems Perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 200–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leaper, C. & Ayres, M.M
(2007) A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults’ language use: Talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 111, 328–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, S., Weidenfeld, J. & Morrisey, E.E
(2004) Transcriptional and DNA binding activity of the Foxp1/2/4 family is modulated by heterotypic and homotypic protein interactions. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 241, 809–822 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y & Rancer, A.S
(2003) Sex differences in intercultural communication apprehension, ethnocentrism, and intercultural willingness to communicate. Psychological Reports, 921, 195–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linacre, J.M
(2009) Winsteps. (Version 3.68) [Computer Software]. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D
(1994) Variables underlying Willingness to Communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 111, 135–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D., Baker, S.C., Clément, R. & Conrod, S
(2001) Willingness to communicate, social support, and language learning orientations of immersion students. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 231, 369–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D., Baker, S.C., Clément, R. & Donovan, L.A
(2003) Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 591, 589–607. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D. & Charos, C
(1996) Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 51, 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z. & Noels, K.A
(1998) Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 821, 545–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D. & Donovan, L.A
(2004) Age and sex differences in willingness to communicate, communication apprehension, and self-perceived competence. Communication Research Reports, 211, 420–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, P.D. & Legatto, J.J
(2010) A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 321, 149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maccoby, E
(1966) The Development of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McCroskey, J.C. & Baer, J.E
(1985, November). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement.Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication association , Denver, Co.
McCroskey, J.C. & Richmond, V.P
(1987) Willingness to communicate and interpersonal communication. In J.C. McCroskey & J.A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129–156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
(1991) Quiet children and the classroom teacher. Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.Google Scholar
Mehl, R.M., Vazire, S., Ramírez-Esparza, N., Slatcher, R.B. & Pennebaker, J.W
(2007) Are women really more talkative than men? Journal of Science, 317(5834), 82–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munezane, Y
(2010, September). The power of will to pass the Rubicon: A way to foster WTC. Paper presented at Doctoral Workshop, EUROSLA Conference 201, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
(2013) Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. EUROSLA Yearbook 131, 176–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) A Structural Equation Model and Intervention Study of Individual Differences, Willingness to Communicate and L2 Use in an EFL Classroom. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, U.S.A.Google Scholar
. (March 2015a) Gender differences in an EFL classroom: Willingness to communicate, ideal L2 self, and effects of goal-setting. Paper presented at the AAAL Annual Conference , Toronto, Canada.
(2015b) Enhancing willingness to communicate: Relative effects of visualization and goal-setting. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 175–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onnela, J., Waber, B.N., Pentland, A., Schnorf, S. & Lazer, D
(2014) Using sociometers to quantify social interaction patters. Scientific Reports, 41, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L
(2013) SLA for the 21st century: Disciplinary progress, transdisciplinary relevance, and the bi/multilingual turn. Currents in Language Learning, 631, 1–24, Supplement 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pawlak, M. & Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A
(2015) Investigating the dynamic nature of L2 willingness to communicate. System, 501, 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peng, J. & Woodrow, L
(2010) Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penke, L. & Deary, I.J
(2010) Some guidelines for structural equation modeling in cognitive neuroscience: The case of Charlton, et al.’s study on white matter integrity and cognitive ageing. Neurobiology of Aging, 311, 1656–1660 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S
(1994) The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: Harper Perennial. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rasch, G
(1960) Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Richmond, V.P. & Roach, K.D
(1992) Willingness to Communicate and Employee Success in US. Organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20 (1), 95–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, S
(2009) Self and identity in L2 motivation in Japan: The ideal l2 self and Japanese learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 120–143). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sick, J.R. & Nagasaka, J.P
(2000) A test of your willingness to communicate in English. Unpublished questionnaire.Google Scholar
Taguchi, T., Magid, M. & Papi, M
(2009) The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda, (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66–97). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whiteley, S
(1997) Using visualization for Learning. Retrieved April, 5, 2010 from [URL].Google Scholar
Wood, J.T
(2007) Gendered Lives: Communication, Gender, and Culture. New York: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Yano, Y
(2003) Communicative competence and English as an international language. Intercultural Communication Studies, 121, 75–83.Google Scholar
Yashima, T
(2002) Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. Modern Language Journal, 861, 56–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L. & Shimizu, K
(2004) The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 541, 119–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Munezane, Yoko
2023. Effects of willingness to communicate on L2 output and leadership roles during jury discussions. Applied Linguistics Review 14:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Ebn-Abbasi, Faramarz, Musa Nushi & Nazila Fattahi
2022. The Role of L2 Motivational Self System and Grit in EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate: A Study of Public School vs. Private English Language Institute Learners. Frontiers in Education 7 DOI logo
Sandeman, David
2022. The relationship between the L2 Motivational Self System and attainment. Lingua Posnaniensis 64:2 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Al-Murtadha, Mutahar A.
2021. The relationships among self-reported and observed first language and second language willingness to communicate and academic achievement. Language, Culture and Curriculum 34:1 ► pp. 80 ff. DOI logo
Balouchi, Shima & Arshad Abdul Samad
2021. The effect of perceived competence on second language communication frequency: the mediating roles of motivation, willingness to communicate, and international posture. Education and Information Technologies 26:5 ► pp. 5917 ff. DOI logo
Pasban, Mohsen Ali, Mehry Haddad Narafshan & Meihua Qian
2020. The relationship between learners’ academic goal motives and L2 (second language) Willingness to communicate in English language classes: A look at academic goal motives’ orientations. Cogent Psychology 7:1 DOI logo
Tarp, Gertrud
2020. Intercultural encounters and their influence on willingness to communicate in a second language other than English. Language and Intercultural Communication 20:3 ► pp. 270 ff. DOI logo
Tarp, Gertrud
2021. Building Dialogue Between Cultures: Expats’ Way of Coping in a Foreign Country and Their Willingness to Communicate in a Foreign Language. In New Perspectives on Willingness to Communicate in a Second Language [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Al‐Murtadha, Mutahar
2019. Enhancing EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate With Visualization and Goal‐Setting Activities. TESOL Quarterly 53:1 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Fukada, Yoshifumi, Joseph Falout, Tetsuya Fukuda & Tim Murphey
2019. Motivational Group Dynamics in SLA: The Interpersonal Interaction Imperative. In The Palgrave Handbook of Motivation for Language Learning, ► pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Ghasemi, Ali Asghar
2018. Ideal L2 Self, Visual Learning Styles, and L2 Self Confidence in predicting Language Proficiency and L2WTC: A Structural Equation Modeling. English Teaching & Learning 42:2 ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
Khajavy, Gholam Hassan & Behzad Ghonsooly
2017. Predictors of willingness to read in English: testing a model based on possible selves and self-confidence. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 38:10 ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.