Article published in:
EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 16 (2016)
Edited by Sarah Ann Liszka, Pascale Leclercq, Marion Tellier and Georges Daniel Véronique
[EUROSLA Yearbook 16] 2016
► pp. 179–210

Testing aptitude

Investigating Meara’s (2005) LLAMA tests

| Swansea University, UK
| Swansea University, UK
| Swansea University, UK
| Swansea University, UK
| Swansea University, UK
| Swansea University, UK
| Swansea University, UK
Meara (2005) developed the LLAMA tests as a free, language-neutral, user-friendly suite of aptitude tests incorporating four separate elements: vocabulary learning (LLAMA_B), phonetic (implicit) memory (LLAMA_D), sound-symbol correspondence (LLAMA_E) and grammatical inferencing (LLAMA_F) based on the standardised MLAT tests (Carroll & Sapon 1959). Recently, they have become increasingly popular in L2 acquisition research (Grañena & Long 2013b). However, Meara has expressed concern about the wide use of these tests without validity testing (cf. Grañena 2013a). To this end, we investigated several areas relating to the LLAMA tests, i.e. (1) the role of gender in LLAMA test performance; (2) language neutrality; (3) the role of age; (4) the role of formal education qualifications; (5) the effect of playing logic puzzles on LLAMA scores and (6) the effect of changing the test timings to scores. 229 participants from a range of language backgrounds, aged 10–75 with various education levels, typologically distinct L1s, and varying levels of multilingualism were tested. A subset of participants was also tested with varying timings for the tests. The results showed that the LLAMA tests are gender and language neutral. The younger learners (10–11s) performed significantly worse than the adults in the sound/symbol correspondence task (LLAMA_E). Formal education qualifications show a significant advantage in 3 of the LLAMA subcomponents (B, E, F) but not the implicit measure (LLAMA_D). Playing logic puzzles did not improve LLAMA test scores. The timings appear to be optimal apart from LLAMA_F, which could be shortened. We suggest that the LLAMA aptitude tests are not significantly affected by these factors although researchers using these tests should be aware of the possible impact of education level on some components of the tests.
Published online: 10 August 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.16.07rog
References

References

Abrahamsson, N. & Hyltenstam, K.
2008 The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4): 481–509. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. & Molis, M.
2001 On the evidence for maturational constraints in second-language acquisition. Journal of memory and language, 44(2): 235–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, M.O., Zou, K.H., Yu, C.R., Liu, K. & Sun, F.W.
2014 A comparison of nonparametric and parametric methods to adjust for baseline measures. Contemporary clinical trials, 37(2): 225–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J.B.
1981 Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude, 83–118.Google Scholar
1990 Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. Language aptitude reconsidered, 11–29.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.B. & Sapon, S.M.
1959 Modern language aptitude test. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
1967 Modern Language Aptitude Test-Elementary Manual. San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Ceci, S.J.
1991 How Much Does Schooling Influence General Intelligence and Its Cognitive Components? A Reassessment of the Evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27(5): 703–722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K.
2013 Circadian rhythms and second language development. International Journal of Bilingualism, online access. Crossref.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
2000 The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 22(04): 499–533.Google Scholar
2008 Implicit and Explicit Learning. In The handbook of second language acquisition. (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) C. Doughty & M. Long (eds.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
2010 “The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective”. In Continuum companion to second language acquisition. E. Macaro (ed.), 247–267. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Ushioda, E.
(eds.) 2009 Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M.
1980 Childhood bilingualism and adult language learning aptitude. Revue Internationale De Psychologie Appliquee/International Review of Applied Psychology, 29(1–2): 159–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E., Yeni-Komshian, G.H. & Liu, S.
1999 Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of memory and language, 41(1): 78–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gholamain, M. & Geva, E.
1999 Orthographic and Cognitive Factors in the Concurrent Development of Basic Reading Skills in English and Persian. Language Learning, 49(2): 183–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grañena, G.
2013a “Cognitive aptitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test.” In Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment, G. Grañena, & M. Long (eds.), 105–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013b Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning, 63(4): 665–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grañena, G. & Long, M.
2013a Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate l2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3): 311–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2013b Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (Vol. 35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. & Meara, P.
1987 The effects of script on visual search. Second Language Research, 3(2): 102–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E.L., Sternberg, R.J. & Ehrman, M.E.
2000 A Theory‐Based Approach to the Measurement of Foreign Language Learning Ability: The Canal‐F Theory and Test. The Modern Language Journal, 84(3): 390–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hamada, M. & Koda, K.
2008 Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58(1): 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.S. & Newport, E.L.
1989 Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive psychology, 21(1): 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
2013 New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment, 35, 131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.D.
1981 Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude, 155–175.Google Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. & Dewey, D.
2012 An examination of the effects of input, aptitude, and motivation on the language proficiency of missionaries learning Japanese as a second language. Second language acquisition abroad: The LDS missionary experience, 45, 51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenneberg, E.H.
1967 Biological foundations of language (Vol. 68). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lundell, F.F. & Sandgren, M.
2013 High-level proficiency in late L2 acquisition Relationships between collocational production. In Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment. G. Grañena & M. Long (eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, M.
1995 Borland’s official no-nonsense guide to Delphi 2. Indianapolis: Sams.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
1990 The relationship between first and second languages: Language proficiency and language aptitude. The development of second language proficiency, 158–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meara, P.
2005 LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.Google Scholar
2013 Imaginary Words. In The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. C. Chapelle (ed.). Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
Muñóz, C.
2014 The Association Between Aptitude Components and Language Skills in Young Learners. In Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism.Studies in Honor of David Singleton. M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (eds.), 51–68. London: Springer International Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, C. & Singleton, D.
2011 A critical review of age-related research on L2 ultimate attainment. Language Teaching, 44(01): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, R. & McLaughlin, B.
1986 Novices and experts: An information processing approach to the “good language learner” problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7(01): 41–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, N., Hansen, N., Krueger, N. & McLaughlin, B.
1990 Language‐Learning Strategies in Monolingual and Multilingual Adults. Language Learning, 40(2): 221–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Opitz, C.
2011 First language attrition and second language acquisition in a second language environment (Doctoral dissertation, Trinity College Dublin.).Google Scholar
Ortega, L.
2009 Foreign Language Aptitude. In Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education, 145–166.Google Scholar
Oxford, R.
1990 Language Learning Strategies. What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & HeinleGoogle Scholar
Parry, T.S. & Stansfield, C.W.
1990 Language aptitude reconsidered (Vol. 74). New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Partchev, I., De Boeck, P. & Steyer, R.
2013 How much power and speed is measured in this test? Assessment, 20(2): 242–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C.R. & Al-Haik, A.R.
1976 The Development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36(2): 369–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pimsleur, P.
1966 Pimsleur language aptitude battery. Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I.R. & Flege, J.E.
2001 Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2: A review. Journal of phonetics, 29(2): 191–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quade, D.
1967 Rank analysis of covariance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(320): 1187–1200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
2001 Individual differences, cognitive abilities, aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 17(4): 368–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Aptitude in Second Language Acquisition. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. C. Chapelle (ed.). Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
Rogers, V.
2015 Testing the LLAMA aptitude tests: an overview. Presented at Language Research Centre seminar series , Swansea University. Available at: http://​viviennerogers​.info​/wp​-uploads​/2011​/06​/LRC2015​_Rogers​.pdf
Rogers, V., Barnett-Legh, T., Curry, C. & Davey, E.
2015 Validating the LLAMA aptitude tests. Presented at EUROSLA 2015 , York. Available at: http://​viviennerogers​.info​/wp​-uploads​/2011​/06​/EUROSLA2015​_Rogers​.pdf
Sáfár, A. & Kormos, J.
2008 Revisiting problems with foreign language aptitude. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46(2): 113–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salthouse, T.A.
2009 When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiology of aging, 30(4): 507–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, M.
1992 Language Aptitude and Language Experience: Are They Related? The language programs of the International University of Japan: working papers, 3, 27–45.Google Scholar
Service, E. & Kohonen, V.
1995 Is the relation between phonological memory and foreign language learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16(02): 155–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Service, E.
1992 Phonology, working memory, and foreign-language learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45(1): 21–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
2002 Theorising and updating aptitude. Individual differences and instructed language learning, 2: 69–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smeds, H.
2012 Perceptual compensation in blind second language (L2) learners Paper presented at the Nordic conference for bilingualism, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Retrieved from: http://​www​.biling​.su​.se​/om​-oss​/kontakt​/medarbetare​/helena​-smeds​-1​.91491
Snow, R.E.
1992 Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational psychologist, 27(1): 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, R.L., Ganschow, L., Fluharty, K. & Little, S.
1995 An exploratory study on the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. Classical Journal, 165–184.Google Scholar
Sparks, R. & Ganschow, L.
2001 Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speciale, G., Ellis, N.C. & Bywater, T.
2004 Phonological sequence learning and short-term store capacity determine second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied psycholinguistics, 25(02): 293–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R.J.
2002 “The theory of successful intelligence and its implications of language aptitude testing”. In Individual differences and instructed language learning. P. Robinson (ed.), 13–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A.S.
2013 The interface of language aptitude and multilingualism: Reconsidering the bilingual/multilingual dichotomy. The Modern Language Journal, 97: 685–701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M.
1981 Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude. K. Diller, (ed.), 119–139.Google Scholar
Wild, C.L., Durso, R. & Rubin, D.B.
1982 Effect of increased test‐taking time on test scores by ethnic group, years out of school, and sex. Journal of Educational Measurement, 19(1): 19–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W. & Pyun, D.O.
2012 The Effects of Sentence Writing on Second Language French and Korean Lexical Retention. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 68(2): 164–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xiang, H., Dediu, D., Roberts, L., Oort, E.V., Norris, D.G. & Hagoort, P.
2012 The structural connectivity underpinning language aptitude, working memory, and IQ in the perisylvian language network. Language learning,62 (s2): 110–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
2013 Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics, 34(3): 344–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Bokander, Lars & Emanuel Bylund
2020. Probing the Internal Validity of the LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Language Learning 70:1 ► pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Costley, Tracey, Christina Gkonou, Florence Myles, Karen Roehr-Brackin & Angela Tellier
2020. Multilingual and monolingual children in the primary-level language classroom: individual differences and perceptions of foreign language learning. The Language Learning Journal 48:5 ► pp. 643 ff. Crossref logo
Granena, Gisela
2019. COGNITIVE APTITUDES AND L2 SPEAKING PROFICIENCY. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41:2 ► pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
2020. Investigating explicit and implicit L2 knowledge and learning: Replications of Erlam (2005) and Roehr-Brackin and Tellier (2019). Language Teaching ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Rogers, Vivienne, Paul Meara, Thomas Barnett-Legh, Clare Curry & Emma Davie
2017. Examining the LLAMA aptitude tests. Journal of the European Second Language Association 1:1 ► pp. 49 ff. Crossref logo
Turker, Sabrina, Susanne M. Reiterer, Peter Schneider & Annemarie Seither-Preisler
2018.  In Exploring Language Aptitude: Views from Psychology, the Language Sciences, and Cognitive Neuroscience [English Language Education, 16], ► pp. 119 ff. Crossref logo
Turker, Sabrina, Susanne M. Reiterer, Annemarie Seither-Preisler & Peter Schneider
2017. “When Music Speaks”: Auditory Cortex Morphology as a Neuroanatomical Marker of Language Aptitude and Musicality. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Turker, Sabrina, Susanne Maria Reiterer, Peter Schneider & Annemarie Seither-Preisler
2019. Auditory Cortex Morphology Predicts Language Learning Potential in Children and Teenagers. Frontiers in Neuroscience 13 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.