Article published in:
EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 2 (2002)Edited by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Tanja Ruthenberg and Marie Louise Poschen
[EUROSLA Yearbook 2] 2002
► pp. 263–286
On rule complexity
A structural approach
Gunther Dietz | University of Munich
It is widely acknowledged by second language researchers that whether pedagogical rules should or can be explicitly taught is largely dependent on their complexity. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on what rule complexity exactly means. This paper first examines existing accounts of rule complexity and presents a conceptual analysis of the term ‘rule’. It then proposes that ‘complex’ should not be equated with ‘difficult’, but used in a purely structural sense. Specifically a conditional formulation is proposed in which the number of concepts in the antecedent and the consequent, the number of subconditions, and the number of ‘if-then’ connections (subrules) within a given rule domain govern complexity. Finally, a classification of strategies of complexity reduction in foreign language pedagogy is sketched. Throughout, examples will be given from the field of German as a foreign language.
Published online: 08 August 2002
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.2.16die
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.2.16die
Cited by
Cited by 7 other publications
Cerezo, Luis, Allison Caras & Ronald P. Leow
Graus, Johan & Peter-Arno Coppen
Housen, Alex & Hannelore Simoens
Rodríguez Silva, Luis Humberto & Karen Roehr-Brackin
Scheffler, Paweł
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.