Article published in:
English World-Wide
Vol. 39:3 (2018) ► pp. 309337
References
Biber, Douglas
2012 “Register as a Predictor of Linguistic Variation”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 81: 9–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1988The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-verbal Particles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
2008 “The Progressive Aspect in World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 281: 225–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017 “Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis”. Journal of English Linguistics 451: 260–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Alison
2016English in the Netherlands: Functions, Forms and Attitudes. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, Michael
2007Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2nd ed. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sydney
1991 “The Development of the International Corpus of English ”. In Karin Aijmer, Bengt Alterberg, and Jan Svartvik, eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 83–91.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2014Coll.analysis 3.5. A Script for R to Compute Perform Collostructional Analyses.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., and Tobias Bernaisch
2016 “Exploring Epicentres Empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes”. English World-Wide 371: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, and Jason Grafmiller
2017 “Stability and Fluidity in Syntactic Variation World-Wide: The Genitive Alternation Across Varieties of English”. Journal of English Linguistics 451: 3–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, and Katrin Vogel
2011Overuse of the Progressive in ESL and Learner Englishes – Fact or Fiction? In Joybrato Mukherjee, and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 145–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kranich, Svenja
2010Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, Haidee, and Bertus van Rooy
2017 “Editorial Practice and the Progressive in Black South African English”. World Englishes 361: 20–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko, and Magnus Levin
2016 “On the Globalization of English: Observations of Subjective Progressives in Present-day Englishes”. In Elena Seoane, and Christina Suárez Gómez, eds. World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 229–252.Google Scholar
Lee, Seung-Ah
2007 “ Ing Forms and the Progressive Puzzle: A Construction-based Approach to English Progressives”. Journal of Linguistics 431: 153–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1987Meaning and the English Verb, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meriläinen, Lea, Heli Paulasto, and Paula Rautionaho
2017 “Extended Uses of the Progressive in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes”. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, Anna Mauranen, and Svetlana Vetchinnikova, eds. Changing English: Global and Local Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter, 191–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja
2007 “The Spread of the Progressive and its ‘Future’ Use”. English Language and Linguistics 111: 191–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paulasto, Heli
2014 “Extended Uses of the Progressive Form in L1 and L2 Englishes”. English World-Wide 351: 247–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula
2014Variation in the Progressive: A Corpus-based Study into World Englishes. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula, and Sandra C. Deshors
2018 “Progressive or not Progressive?: Modeling Constructional Choices in EFL and ESL”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research. Special Issue on Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Römer, Ute
2005Progressives, Patterns, Pedagogy: A Corpus-Driven Approach to English Progressive Forms, Functions, Contexts and Didactics. Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus
2006 “The Extension of the Progressive Aspect in Black South African English”. World Englishes 251: 37–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Progressive Aspect and Stative Verbs in Outer Circle Varieties”. World Englishes 331: 157–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus, and Caroline Piotrowska
2015 “The Development of an Extended Time Period Meaning of the Progressive in Black South African English”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 465–483.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerold
2008Hybrid Long-Distance Functional Dependency Parsing. PhD Dissertation, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
Schneider, Gerold, and Marianne Hundt
2012 “ ‘Off with Their Heads’: Profiling TAM in ICE corpora”. In Marianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani
2009 “Typological Diversity in New Englishes”. English World-Wide 301: 170–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota S.
1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006 “Distinctive Collexeme Analysis and Diachrony: A Comment”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21: 257–262. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries
2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 81: 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte
1998Aspect Shift and Coercion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 161: 347–385 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1957Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 661: 143–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie, Nick C. Ellis, Ute Römer, Kathleen BardoviHarlig, and Chelsea J. Leblanc
2009 “The Acquisition of Tense-Aspect: Converging Evidence from Corpora and Telicity Ratings”. The Modern Language Journal 931: 354–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2018. The use of stative progressives by school-age learners of English and the importance of the variable context. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2  pp. 195 ff. Crossref logo
Fuchs, Robert & Valentin Werner
2020.  In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108],  pp. 54 ff. Crossref logo
Hundt, Marianne, Paula Rautionaho & Carolin Strobl
2020. Progressive or simple? A corpus-based study of aspect in World Englishes. Corpora 15:1  pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
RAUTIONAHO, PAULA & ROBERT FUCHS
2021. Recent change in stative progressives: a collostructional investigation of British English in 1994 and 2014. English Language and Linguistics 25:1  pp. 35 ff. Crossref logo
Rautionaho, Paula & Marianne Hundt
2021. Primed progressives? Predicting aspectual choice in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Wu, Tianqi & Min Wang
2020. Development of the progressive construction in Chinese EFL learners’ written production: From prototypes to marginal members. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.