Usage-based research in linguistics has to a large extent relied on corpus data. However, a feature’s “failure to
appear in even a very large corpus (such as the Web) is not evidence for ungrammaticality, nor is appearance evidence for
grammaticality” (Schütze and Sprouse 2013: 29). It is therefore advisable to complement
corpus-based analyses with experimental data, so as to (ideally) obtain converging evidence. This paper reviews reasons for
combining corpus linguistic with psycholinguistic experimental methods, and demonstrates how research on varieties of English can
profit from experimentation. For a study of conversion in Asian Englishes, the maze task (Forster, Guerrera, and Elliot 2009; Forster 2010) was implemented with a
web-based, open-source software. The results of the experiment dovetail with a previous analysis of the Corpus of Global
Web-based English (Davies 2013). These results should encourage
researchers not to base findings exclusively on corpus evidence, but corroborate them by means of experimental data.
2007 “Is Syntactic Knowledge Probabilistic? Experiments with the English Dative Alternation”. In Sam Featherston, and Wolfgang Sternefeld, eds. Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Berlin: De Gruyter, 75–96.
Bresnan, Joan, and Marilyn Ford
2010 “Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English”. Language 861: 168–213.
Bybee, Joan L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derix, Johanna, Olga Iljina, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Ad Aertsen, and Tonio Ball
2012 “ ‘Doctor’ or ‘Darling’? Decoding the Communication Partner from ECoG of the Anterior Temporal Lobe during Non-Experimental, Real-Life Social Interaction”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 251.
2008 “On (In)frequency and (Un)acceptability”. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, ed. Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications – State of the Art. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 213–233.
Don, Jan, Mieke Trommelen, and Wim Zonneveld
2000 “Conversion and Category Indeterminacy”. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, and Joachim Mugdan, eds. Morphologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.
Forster, Kenneth I.
The Word Maze Game”. [URL] (accessed April 16, 2015).
Forster, Kenneth I., Christine Guerrera, and Lisa Elliot
2009 “The Maze Task: Measuring Forced Incremental Sentence Processing Time”. Behavior Research Methods 411: 163–171.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Stefan Th. Gries
2009 “Corpora and Experimental Methods: A State-of-the-Art Review”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 51: 1–26.
Gries, Stefan Th.
2002 “Evidence in Linguistics: Three Approaches to Genitives in English”. In Ruth M. Brend, William J. Sullivan, and Arle R. Lommel, eds. LACUS Forum XXVIII: What Constitutes Evidence in Linguistics? Fullerton: Linguistic Society of Canada and the United States, 17–31.
Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, and Doris Schönefeld
2005 “Converging Evidence. Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Association of Verbs and Constructions”. Cognitive Linguistics 161: 635–676.
2017 “Frequencies in Diachronic Corpora and Knowledge of Language”. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin, and Simone E. Pfenninger, eds. The Changing English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–68.
2015QualityCrowd2. [URL] (accessed June 30, 2015).
2016 “Conversion in Asian Englishes. A Usage-Based Account of the Emergence of New Local Norms”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.
Keimel, Christian, Julian Habigt, Clemens Horch, and Klaus Diepold
2012 “QualityCrowd – A Framework for Crowd-Based Quality Evaluation”. In Marek Domański, Tomasz Grajek, Damian Karwowski, and Ryszard Stasiński, eds. Proceedings, 2012 Picture Coding Symposium. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 245–248.
Kosinski, Robert J.
2013 “A Literature Review on Reaction Time”. [URL] (accessed May 7, 2015).
Langacker, Ronald W.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter.
2013 “Contractions of English Semi-Modals: The Emancipating Effect of Frequency”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.
2017 “From Priming and Processing to Frequency Effects and Grammaticalization? Contracted Semi-Modals in Present-Day English”. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin, and Simone E. Pfenninger, eds. The Changing English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–212.
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip
1994Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Meunier, Fanny, and Damien Littré
2013 “Tracking Learners’ Progress. Adopting a Dual ‘Corpus cum Experimental Data’ Approach”. The Modern Language Journal 971: 61–76.
1980Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.
2022. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 307 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.