Article published in:
English World-Wide
Vol. 40:1 (2019) ► pp. 2553


Davies, Mark
2013 “Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countrieshttp://​corpus2​.byu​.edu​/glowbe/.
Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert, and Arne Zeschel
2010 “Cognitive Corpus Linguistics: Five Points of Debate on Current Theory and Methodology”. Corpora 51: 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arppe, Antti, and Juhani Järvikivi
2007 “Every Method Counts: Combining Corpus-Based and Experimental Evidence in the Study of Synonymy”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 31: 131–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, and Petar Milin
2010 “Analyzing Reaction Times”. International Journal of Psychological Research 31: 12–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming
2010a “A Usage-Based Approach to Substratum Transfer: The Case of four Unproductive Features in Singapore English”. Language 861: 792–820. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b “ Must in Singapore English”. Lingua 1201: 1727–1737. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Michael H.
2004 “Human Research and Data Collection via the Internet”. Annual Review of Psychology 551: 803–832. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice
2012Entrenchment in Usage-Based Theories: What Corpus Data Do and Do not Reveal about the Mind. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Jeremy K., and Adele E. Goldberg
2011 “Learning what not to Say. The Role of Statistical Preemption and Categorization in a-Adjective Production”. Language 871: 55–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Silke, and Evan Kidd
2011 “Relative Clause Acquisition and Representation: Evidence from Spontaneous Speech, Sentence Repetition, and Comprehension”. In Doris Schönefeld, ed. Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 273–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
2007 “Is Syntactic Knowledge Probabilistic? Experiments with the English Dative Alternation”. In Sam Featherston, and Wolfgang Sternefeld, eds. Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Berlin: De Gruyter, 75–96.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Marilyn Ford
2010 “Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English”. Language 861: 168–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Callies, Marcus
2016 “Towards a Process-Oriented Approach to Comparing EFL and ESL Varieties. A Corpus-Study of Lexical Innovations”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 21: 229–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derix, Johanna, Olga Iljina, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Ad Aertsen, and Tonio Ball
2012 “ ‘Doctor’ or ‘Darling’? Decoding the Communication Partner from ECoG of the Anterior Temporal Lobe during Non-Experimental, Real-Life Social Interaction”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 251.Google Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar
2008 “On (In)frequency and (Un)acceptability”. In Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, ed. Corpus Linguistics, Computer Tools, and Applications – State of the Art. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 213–233.Google Scholar
Don, Jan, Mieke Trommelen, and Wim Zonneveld
2000 “Conversion and Category Indeterminacy”. In Geert E. Booij, Christian Lehmann, and Joachim Mugdan, eds. Morphologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Vol. 11. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.Google Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I.
2010 “Using a Maze Task to Track Lexical and Sentence Processing”. The Mental Lexicon 51: 347–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Kenneth I., Christine Guerrera, and Lisa Elliot
2009 “The Maze Task: Measuring Forced Incremental Sentence Processing Time”. Behavior Research Methods 411: 163–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Stefan Th. Gries
2009 “Corpora and Experimental Methods: A State-of-the-Art Review”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 51: 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.
2002 “Evidence in Linguistics: Three Approaches to Genitives in English”. In Ruth M. Brend, William J. Sullivan, and Arle R. Lommel, eds. LACUS Forum XXVIII: What Constitutes Evidence in Linguistics? Fullerton: Linguistic Society of Canada and the United States, 17–31.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th., Beate Hampe, and Doris Schönefeld
2005 “Converging Evidence. Bringing Together Experimental and Corpus Data on the Association of Verbs and Constructions”. Cognitive Linguistics 161: 635–676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2017 “Frequencies in Diachronic Corpora and Knowledge of Language”. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin, and Simone E. Pfenninger, eds. The Changing English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 49–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horch, Clemens
2015QualityCrowd2. https:github​.com​/clorch​/QualityCrowd2 (accessed June 30, 2015).
Horch, Stephanie
2016 “Conversion in Asian Englishes. A Usage-Based Account of the Emergence of New Local Norms”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keimel, Christian, Julian Habigt, Clemens Horch, and Klaus Diepold
2012 “QualityCrowd – A Framework for Crowd-Based Quality Evaluation”. In Marek Domański, Tomasz Grajek, Damian Karwowski, and Ryszard Stasiński, eds. Proceedings, 2012 Picture Coding Symposium. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 245–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kosinski, Robert J.
2013 “A Literature Review on Reaction Time”. http://​biae​.clemson​.edu​/bpc​/bp​/lab​/110​/reaction​.htm (accessed May 7, 2015).
Langacker, Ronald W.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, David
2013 “Contractions of English Semi-Modals: The Emancipating Effect of Frequency”. Ph.D. Dissertation, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian
2013 “The World System of Englishes: Accounting for the Transnational Importance of Mobile and Mediated Vernaculars”. English World-Wide 341: 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “From Priming and Processing to Frequency Effects and Grammaticalization? Contracted Semi-Modals in Present-Day English”. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin, and Simone E. Pfenninger, eds. The Changing English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 191–212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Stephen, and Virginia Yip
1994Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meunier, Fanny, and Damien Littré
2013 “Tracking Learners’ Progress. Adopting a Dual ‘Corpus cum Experimental Data’ Approach”. The Modern Language Journal 971: 61–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
1980Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Th. Gries
2009 “Collostructional Nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-Construction Associations in the International Corpus of English”. English World-Wide 301: 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald
2004 “Introduction”. World Englishes 231: 225–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavesi, Maria
1998 “ ‘Same Word, Same Idea’: Conversion as a Word Formation Process”. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 361: 213–231.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, José C., and Douglas M. Bates
2000Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Po-Ching, Yip, and Don Rimmington
2004Chinese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, Roger, Anjali Thapar, Pablo Gomez, and Gail McKoon
2004 “A Diffusion Model Analysis of the Effects of Aging in the Lexical-Decision Task”. Psychology and Aging 191: 278–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reips, Ulf-Dietrich
2002 “Standards for Internet-Based Experimenting”. Experimental Psychology 491: 243–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2003 “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “New Reflections on the Evolutionary Dynamics of World Englishes”. World Englishes 331: 9–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schönefeld, Doris
ed. 2011aConverging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011b “Introduction: On Evidence and the Convergence of Evidence in Linguistic Research”. In Doris Schönefeld, ed. Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T., and Jon Sprouse
2013 “Judgment Data”. In Robert J. Podesva, and Devyani Sharma, eds. Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 27–50.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Benedikt Heller, and Melanie Röthlisberger
2016 “Around the World in Three Alternations: Modelling Syntactic Variation in Varieties of English”. English World-Wide 371: 109–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallentin, Mikkel
2009 “Putative Sex Differences in Verbal Abilities and Language Cortex. A Critical Review”. Brain and Language 1081: 175–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jessica
1987 “Non-Native Varieties of English: A Special Case of Language Acquisition”. English World-Wide 81: 161–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2013 “Dative and Genitive Variability in Late Modern English: Exploring Cross-Constructional Variation and Change”. Diachronica 301: 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie
2009 “Converging Evidence from Corpus and Experimental Data to Capture Idiomaticity”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 51: 131–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Hundt, Marianne
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes,  pp. 506 ff. Crossref logo
Lorenz, David & David Tizón-Couto
2020.  In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
2021. Negation as a predictor of clausal complement choice in World Englishes. English Language and Linguistics  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.