Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 40:2 (2019) ► pp.115143
References
Anthony, Laurence
2014AntConc (Version 3.2.4). Tokyo: Waseda University [URL].
Bailey, Guy, Tom Wilke, Jan Tillery, and Lori Sand
1991 “The Apparent Time Construct”. Language Variation and Change 31: 241–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Philip, and Anand Syea
eds. 1996Changing Meaning, Changing Functions: Papers Relating to Grammaticalization in Contact Languages. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming
2010 “ Must in Singapore English”. Lingua 1201: 1727–1737. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bautista, Maria L. S.
2001 “Studies of Philippine English: Implications for English Language Teaching in the Philippines”. Journal of Southeast Asian Education 21: 271–293.Google Scholar
Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga
2009 “A Survey on Language Use, Attitudes, and Identity in Relation to Philippine English among Young Generation Filipinos: An Initial Sample from a Private University”. Philippine ESL Journal 31: 74–107.Google Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2012Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bruyn, Adrienne
2009 “Grammaticalization in Creoles. Ordinary and Not-So-Ordinary Cases”. Studies in Language 331: 312–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar. Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2003 “Mechanisms of Change in Grammaticization: The Role of Frequency”. In Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, eds. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Usage-Based Theory and Grammaticalization”. In Bernd Heine, and Heiko Narrog, eds. Handbook of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 69–78.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
2009 “Modals and Quasi-Modals in World Englishes”. World Englishes 281: 281–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a “Grammatical Colloquialism and the English Quasi-Modals: A Comparative Study”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 155–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b “Grammatical Variation in English Worldwide: The Role of Colloquialization”. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 81: 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, and Xinyue Yao
2014 “Modality in Philippine English: A Diachronic Study”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 68–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friginal, Eric
2011 “The Modal Verb Would in Spoken and Written Philippine English”. In Maria Lourdes Bautista, ed. Studies of Philippine English: Exploring the Philippine Component of the International Corpus of English. Manila: Anvil Publishing, 51–74.Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke
2017 “The ICE Metadata and the Study of Hong Kong English”. World Englishes 361: 471–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries. Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva
2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2009 “Colonial Lag, Colonial Innovation or Simply Language Change?”. In Günter Rohdenburg, and Julia Schlütter, eds. One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a “ Do-Support in New Zealand and Australian English”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–86.Google Scholar
2015b “World Englishes”. In Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 381–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer
eds. 2013The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology [URL] (accessed March 15, 2016).
Krug, Manfred G.
2000Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred, and Ole Schützler
2013 “Recent Change and Grammaticalization”. In Bas Aarts, Geoffrey Leech, Joanne Close, and Jeremy Smith, eds. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 155–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1963 “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191: 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Principles of Linguistic Change. Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003 “The English Modal Auxiliaries 1961–1992”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Robert Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 223–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “The Modals ARE Declining”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 161: 547–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality. Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985 “Grammaticalization: Synchronic Variation and Diachronic Change”. Lingua e stile 201: 303–318.Google Scholar
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2009 The Semantic Predecessors of Need in the History of English (c750–1710) . Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2016 “(Semi-)Modals of Necessity in Hong Kong and Indian Englishes”. In Elena Seoane, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez, eds. World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 143–172.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006Twentieth Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “British English / American English Grammar: Convergence in Writing, Divergence in Speech?Anglia 1251: 84–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Cross-Variety Diachronic Drifts and Ephemeral Regional Contrasts. An Analysis of Modality in the Extended Brown Family of Corpora and what it Can Tell us about the New Englishes”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–146.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko
2008Language Evolution. Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2007 “Steady States in the Evolution of New Englishes: Present-Day Indian English as an Equilibrium”. Journal of English Linguistics 351: 157–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Th. Gries
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marco Schilk
2012 “Exploring Variation and Change in New Englishes. Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and Beyond”. In Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–199.Google Scholar
Nelson, Gerald
2005 “Expressing Future Time in Philippine English”. In Danilo T. Dayak, and J. Stephen Quakenbush, eds. Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 41–59.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, Bertus van Rooy, and Johan van der Auwera
eds. 2014Special Issue on Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 3–88.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, and Johan van der Auwera
2015 “Recent Quantitative Changes in the Use of Modals and Quasi-Modals in the Hong Kong, British and American Printed Press. Exploring the Potential of Factiva® for the Diachronic Investigation of World Englishes”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 437–464.Google Scholar
Pefianco Martin, Isabel
2014 “English Language Teaching in the Philippines”. World Englishes 331: 472–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rossouw, Ronel, and Bertus van Rooy
2012 “Diachronic Changes in Modality in South African English”. English World-Wide 331: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmied, Josef
1994 “Syntactic Style Variation in Indian English”. In Günther Blaicher, and Brigitte Glaser, eds. Anglistentag 1993 Eichstätt: Proceedings. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 217–232.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2005 “The Subjunctive in Philippine English”. In Danilo T. Dayak, and J. Stephen Quakenbush, eds. Linguistics and Language Education in the Philippines and Beyond: A Festschrift in Honor of Ma. Lourdes S. Bautista. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, 27–40.Google Scholar
2007Postcolonial Englishes: Varieties of English around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedlatschek, Andreas
2009Contemporary Indian English. Variation and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Nicholas
2003 “Changes in the Modals and Semi-Modals of Strong Obligation and Epistemic Necessity in Recent British English”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug, and Frank Robert Palmer, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 241–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic change”. Language 651: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Review of Baker & Syea (1996)”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 141: 208–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C., and Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Dirk Noël, and Astrid de Wit
2012 “The Diverging Need (to)’s of Asian Englishes”. In Marianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity World-Wide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 54–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2012 “Grammaticalization Clines in Space: Zooming in on Synchronic Traces of Diffusion Processes”. In Björn Wiemer, Bernhard Wälchli, and Björn Hansen, eds. Grammatical Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 233–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony R.
1993English Auxiliaries. Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Ronel, and Bertus van Rooy
2014 “The Development of Modals of Obligation and Necessity in White South African English through Contact with Afrikaans”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 31–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2009 “Multidimensional Analysis and the Study of World Englishes”. World Englishes 281: 421–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra P.
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Basile, Carmelo Alessandro
2023. Necessity modal development in Singapore English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:2  pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter
2023. Modals and Quasi-Modals in English World-Wide. Journal of English Linguistics 51:3  pp. 265 ff. DOI logo
Davydova, Julia
2023. Tracking global English changes through local data: Intensifiers in German Learner English. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo
Kranich, Svenja, Elisabeth Hampel & Hanna Bruns
2020. Changes in the modal domain in different varieties of English as potential effects of democratization. Language Sciences 79  pp. 101271 ff. DOI logo
Laliberté, Catherine
2022. A Diachronic Study of Modals and Semi-modals in Indian English Newspapers. Journal of English Linguistics 50:2  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2020. (Un)democratic Epicene Pronouns in Asian Englishes: A Register Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 48:3  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2020. Linguistic Colloquialisation, Democratisation and Gender in Asian Englishes. In Gender in World Englishes,  pp. 176 ff. DOI logo
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2021. Linguistic democratization in HKE across registers: The effects of prescriptivism. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:2  pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Morin, Cameron & Carmelo Alessandro Basile
2022. Elicitation and experimentation: implications for English sociolinguistics. Anglophonia :34 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.