Cover not available
Review published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 40:3 (2019) ► pp.349–355
Book review

John H. McWhorter. 2018. The Creole Debate

Reviewed by
| University of Freiburg
Published online: 24 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00036.mai
References

References

Bickerton, Derek
1981 Roots of Language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.Google Scholar
Booij, Gert
1996 “Inherent versus Contextual Inflection and the Split Morphology Hypothesis”. In Geert Booij, and Jaap van Marle, eds. Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack
1995 Sociolinguistic Theory (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979 On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2001 The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael, Peter Bakker, and John H. McWhorter
2018 “Creoles and Sociolinguistic Complexity: Response to Ansaldo”. Language Sciences 661: 226–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, Leo
ed. 1922 Hugo Schuchardt-Brevier: Ein Vademecum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957 Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1973 “Conditions on Transformations”. In Stephen R. Anderson, and Paul Kiparsky, eds. A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 232–286.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik
1977 “Filters and Control”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 425–504.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar