Article published in:
English World-Wide
Vol. 41:1 (2020) ► pp. 132
Sources

Sources

Davies, Mark
2013 “Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countrieshttp://​corpus2​.byu​.edu​/glowbe/.

References

Baayen, R. Harald
2001Word Frequency Distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Analyzing Linguistic Variation: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009 “Corpus Linguistics in Morphology: Morphological Productivity”. In Anke Lüdeling, and Merja Kytö, eds. Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter, 899–919.Google Scholar
Baroni, Marco and Stefan Evert
2014 “The zipfR Package for Lexical Statistics: A Tutorial Introduction”. October 3 2014 <http://​zipfr​.r​-forge​.r​-project​.org​/materials​/zipfr​-tutorial​.pdf (accessed October 8, 2018).
Bauer, Laurie
2001Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Bruckmaier, Elisabeth
2017Getting at Get in World Englishes: A Corpus-Based Semasiological-Syntactic Analysis. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, Marc, Amy Beth Warriner, and Victor Kuperman
2014 “Concreteness Ratings for 40 Thousand Generally Known English Word Lemmas”. Behavior Research Methods 46: 904–911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Callies, Marcus
2011 “Widening the Goalposts of Cognitive Metaphor Research”. In Marcus Callies, Wolfram R. Keller, and Astrid Lohöfer, eds. Bi-Directionality in the Cognitive Sciences: Avenues, Challenges, and Limitations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 “Derivation by Phase”. In Michael Kenstowicz, ed. Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1–52.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William and D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark and Robert Fuchs
2015 “Expanding Horizons in the Study of World Englishes with the 1.9 Billion Word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE)”. English World-Wide 36: 1–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Nick C.
2013 “Construction Grammar and Second Language Acquisition”. In Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 365–378.Google Scholar
Evert, Stefan
2004 “A Simple LNRE Model for Random Character Sequences”. In Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon, and Anne Dister, eds. Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Textual Data Statistical Analysis. Louvain-la-Neuve: UCL, 411–422.Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
2019 “A Construction of Independent Means: The History of the Way Construction Revisited. English Language and Linguistics 23: 671–699. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay, and Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988 “Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone ”. Language 64: 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew and Jennifer Hill
2007Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003 “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language”. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 7: 219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas
2004HCFA 3.2 – A Program for Hierarchical Configural Frequency Analysis http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/faculty​/stgries​/research​/overview​-research​.html.
2009Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2011Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-based Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2014 “The Cognitive Evolution of Englishes: The Role of Constructions in the Dynamic Model”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 160–180.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas and Graeme Trousdale
eds. 2013The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
1996 “The Way Constructions Grow”. In Adele E. Goldberg, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford: CSLI, 217–230.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1993Semantic Structures. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mondorf, Britta
2010 “Variation and Change in English Resultative Constructions”. Language Variation and Change 22: 397–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED Online
2019 <www​.oed​.com (accessed October 21, 2019).
Perek, Florent
2018 “Recent Change in the Productivity and Schematicity of the Way-Construction: A Distributional Semantic Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14: 65–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo
2003Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Productivity”. In Bas Aarts, and April M. S. McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Malden: Blackwell, 537–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2016English Morphology and Word-Formation: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2003 “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 79: 233–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes”. World Englishes 23: 227–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skandera, Paul
2003Drawing a Map of Africa. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Stefan Thomas Gries
2005 “Covarying Collexemes”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1: 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steger, Maria and Edgar W. Schneider
2012 “Complexity as a Function of Iconicity: The Case of Complement Clause Constructions in New Englishes”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 156–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szczesniak, Konrad
2013 “You Can’t Cry your Way to Candy: Motion Events and Paths in the X’s Way Construction”. Cognitive Linguistics 24: 159–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Jessica
1987 “Non-Native Varieties of English: A Special Case of Language Acquisition”. English World-Wide 8: 161–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeldes, Amir
2013 “Productive Argument Selection: Is Lexical Semantics Enough?”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9: 263–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Akinlotan, Mayowa
2020. Relativiser Alternation and Relative Clause Complexity: Insights from Nigerian and American Varieties. Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies :29/2  pp. 91 ff. Crossref logo
Hoffmann, Thomas
2020. Marginal Argument Structure constructions: the [V the Ntaboo-wordout of]-construction in Post-colonial Englishes. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 Crossref logo
Hundt, Marianne
2021. On models and modelling. World Englishes 40:3  pp. 298 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.