A sociolinguistic perspective on the (quasi-)modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English
This article examines the distribution and sociolinguistic patterning of (quasi-)modals which express strong obligation/necessity, namely must, have to, have got to, got to and need to, in Australian English. Variationist studies in other varieties of English have had contrasting findings in terms of distributions of root forms, as well as their conditioning by social and linguistic factors. The corpus analysis suggests real-time increased use of need to and decrease in have got to through comparison to earlier findings. The variationist analysis shows quasi-modals have to, have got to and got to as sensitive to speaker age and sex, and a recent increase of have to via apparent time modelling. Linguistic conditioning relating to the type of obligation and subject form is also found. The study contributes to sociolinguistic understanding of this large-scale change in English and the place of Australian English amongst other varieties.
Keywords: Australian English, root modality, epistemic modality, quasi-modals, language change, age, sex, apparent time
- 1.1Context and focus
- 1.2The forms
- 2.Previous research
- 2.1In Australian English
- 2.2Sociolinguistic work in other varieties of English
- 3.This study
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Corpus analysis of distribution
- 4.2Variationist analysis
- 4.2.1Social factors
- 4.2.2Linguistic factors
- 4.2.3Multivariate analysis
Published online: 09 November 2020
Close, Joanne and Bas Aarts
2010 “Current Change in the Modal System of English: A Case Study of Must, Have to and Have Got To ”. In Ursula Lenker, Judith Hurber, and Robert Mailhammer, eds. English Historical Linguistics 2008. Vol. 1: The History of English Verbal and Nominal Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–182.
Collins, Peter C.
Denis, Derek and Alexandra D’Arcy
Depraetere, Ilse and Susan Reed
Fehringer, Carol and Karen P. Corrigan
Hoffman, Michol F. and James A. Walker
2014 “ ‘Toronto Has Everything’, ‘Toronto’s Got It All’: Ethnolinguistic Dimensions of Have in Toronto English”. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and University of Illinois at Chicago.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2017 Rbrul (Version 3.1.1) http://www.danielezrajohnson.com/rbrul.html.
Krug, Manfred G.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2013 “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115.
Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2011–2017 Vassar Stats. Vassar College, Poughkeepsie http://vassarstats.net/.
Penry Williams, Cara
2018 “The Analytic Importance of Metapragmatics in Variationist Methodology: Voicings within Australian English”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
Penry Williams, Cara and Minna Korhonen
2018 “Variation and Change in Possession and Root Modality in Australian English: The Declining Fortunes of Have Got ”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D’Arcy
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Jennifer Smith
Walker, James A. and Michol F. Hoffman
2016 “Ethnolinguistic Variation in Toronto English: Possession and Deontic Modality”. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Linguistics Society, Marriott Marquis Washington, DC.