Article published In:
English World-WideVol. 41:3 (2020) ► pp.267–294
A sociolinguistic perspective on the (quasi-)modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English
This article examines the distribution and sociolinguistic patterning of (quasi-)modals which express strong obligation/necessity, namely must, have to, have got to, got to and need to, in Australian English. Variationist studies in other varieties of English have had contrasting findings in terms of distributions of root forms, as well as their conditioning by social and linguistic factors. The corpus analysis suggests real-time increased use of need to and decrease in have got to through comparison to earlier findings. The variationist analysis shows quasi-modals have to, have got to and got to as sensitive to speaker age and sex, and a recent increase of have to via apparent time modelling. Linguistic conditioning relating to the type of obligation and subject form is also found. The study contributes to sociolinguistic understanding of this large-scale change in English and the place of Australian English amongst other varieties.
Keywords: Australian English, root modality, epistemic modality, quasi-modals, language change, age, sex, apparent time
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Context and focus
- 1.2The forms
- 2.Previous research
- 2.1In Australian English
- 2.2Sociolinguistic work in other varieties of English
- 3.This study
- 3.1Data
- 3.2Analysis
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Corpus analysis of distribution
- 4.2Variationist analysis
- 4.2.1Social factors
- 4.2.2Linguistic factors
- 4.2.3Multivariate analysis
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Baker, Paul
2011 “Times May Change, but We Will Always Have Money: Diachronic Variation in Recent British English”. Journal of English Linguistics 391: 65–88. 
Close, Joanne and Bas Aarts
2010 “Current Change in the Modal System of English: A Case Study of Must, Have to and Have Got To
”. In Ursula Lenker, Judith Hurber, and Robert Mailhammer, eds. English Historical Linguistics 2008. Vol. 1: The History of English Verbal and Nominal Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–182.
Coates, Jennifer
1983 The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Routledge.
Collins, Peter C.
1991 “The Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English”. In Karin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 145–165.
2005 “The Modals and Quasi-Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English and Other Englishes”. English World-Wide 261: 249–273.
2007 “Modal Wars: Some Ascendant Semi-Modals in Australian English”. In Jeff Siegel, John Lynch, and Diana Eades, eds. Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197–208.
2009a Modals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
2009b “Modals and Quasi-Modals”. In Peter C. Collins, Pam Peters, and Adam Smith, eds. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–88.
2014 “Quasi-Modals and Modals in Australian English Fiction 1800–1999, with Comparisons across British and American English”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 7–30.
Denis, Derek and Alexandra D’Arcy
2019 “Deriving Homogeneity in a Settler Colonial Variety of English”. American Speech 941: 223–258.
Depraetere, Ilse and Susan Reed
2006 “Mood and Modality in English”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 269–290.
Downes, William
1998 Language and Society (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fehringer, Carol and Karen P. Corrigan
2015 “ ‘You’ve Got to Sort of Eh Hoy the Geordie Out’: Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Fifty Years of Tyneside English”. English Language and Linguistics 191: 355–381.
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hansen, Beke
2018 Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill.
Hoffman, Michol F. and James A. Walker
2014 “ ‘Toronto Has Everything’, ‘Toronto’s Got It All’: Ethnolinguistic Dimensions of Have in Toronto English”. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and University of Illinois at Chicago.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jankowski, Bridget
2004 “A Transatlantic Perspective of Variation and Change in English Deontic Modality”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 231: 85–113.
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
Krug, Manfred G.
2000 Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Labov, William
1963 “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191: 273–309.
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell.
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2013 “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115.
Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lowry, Richard
Mair, Christian
2014 “Do We Got a Difference? Divergent Developments of Semi-Auxiliary (Have) Got (to) in British and American English”. In Marianne Hundt, ed. Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–76.
Nokkonen, Soili
2010 “ ‘How Many Taxis There Needs to Be?’ The Sociolinguistic Variation of Need to in Spoken British English”. Corpora 51: 45–74.
Palmer, Frank
1990 Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Penry Williams, Cara
2018 “The Analytic Importance of Metapragmatics in Variationist Methodology: Voicings within Australian English”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
2019a “Appeals to Semiotic Registers in Ethno-Metapragmatic Accounts of Variation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 291: 294–313.
2019b Folklinguistics and Social Meaning in Australian English. Abingdon: Routledge.
Penry Williams, Cara and Minna Korhonen
2018 “Variation and Change in Possession and Root Modality in Australian English: The Declining Fortunes of Have Got
”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
Smith, Nicholas
2003 “Changes in the Modals and Semi-Modals of Strong Obligation and Epistemic Necessity in Recent British English”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, and Manfred Krug, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 241–266.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2004 “
Have to, Gotta, Must?: Grammaticalisation, Variation and Specialization in English Deontic Modality”. In Hans Lindquist, and Christian Mair, eds. Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33–55.
2012 Roots of English: Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D’Arcy
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Jennifer Smith
2006 “Layering, Competition and a Twist of Fate: Deontic Modality in Dialects of English”. Diachronica 231: 341–380.
Tannen, Deborah
1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. In Florian Coulmas, ed. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 311–332.
Trousdale, Graeme
2003 “Simplification and Redistribution: An Account of Modal Verb Usage in Tyneside English”. English World-Wide 241: 271–284.
Walker, James A. and Michol F. Hoffman
2016 “Ethnolinguistic Variation in Toronto English: Possession and Deontic Modality”. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Linguistics Society, Marriott Marquis Washington, DC.