Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 41:3 (2020) ► pp.267294
Baker, Paul
2011 “Times May Change, but We Will Always Have Money: Diachronic Variation in Recent British English”. Journal of English Linguistics 391: 65–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Close, Joanne and Bas Aarts
2010 “Current Change in the Modal System of English: A Case Study of Must, Have to and Have Got To ”. In Ursula Lenker, Judith Hurber, and Robert Mailhammer, eds. English Historical Linguistics 2008. Vol. 1: The History of English Verbal and Nominal Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 165–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter C.
1991 “The Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Australian English”. In Karin Aijmer, and Bengt Altenberg, eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 145–165.Google Scholar
2007 “Modal Wars: Some Ascendant Semi-Modals in Australian English”. In Jeff Siegel, John Lynch, and Diana Eades, eds. Language Description, History and Development: Linguistic Indulgence in Memory of Terry Crowley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009aModals and Quasi-Modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b “Modals and Quasi-Modals”. In Peter C. Collins, Pam Peters, and Adam Smith, eds. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Quasi-Modals and Modals in Australian English Fiction 1800–1999, with Comparisons across British and American English”. Journal of English Linguistics 421: 7–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek and Alexandra D’Arcy
2019 “Deriving Homogeneity in a Settler Colonial Variety of English”. American Speech 941: 223–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse and Susan Reed
2006 “Mood and Modality in English”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 269–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downes, William
1998Language and Society (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fehringer, Carol and Karen P. Corrigan
2015 “ ‘You’ve Got to Sort of Eh Hoy the Geordie Out’: Modals of Obligation and Necessity in Fifty Years of Tyneside English”. English Language and Linguistics 191: 355–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Beke
2018Corpus Linguistics and Sociolinguistics: A Study of Variation and Change in the Modal Systems of World Englishes. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F. and James A. Walker
2014 “ ‘Toronto Has Everything’, ‘Toronto’s Got It All’: Ethnolinguistic Dimensions of Have in Toronto English”. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign and University of Illinois at Chicago.
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget
2004 “A Transatlantic Perspective of Variation and Change in English Deontic Modality”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 231: 85–113.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2017Rbrul (Version 3.1.1) [URL].
Krug, Manfred G.
2000Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1963 “The Social Motivation of a Sound Change”. Word 191: 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
2013 “Where Have All the Modals Gone? An Essay on the Declining Frequency of Core Modal Auxiliaries in Recent Standard English”. In Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita, and Johan van der Auwera, eds. English Modality: Core, Periphery and Evidentiality. Berlin: De Gruyter, 95–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowry, Richard
2011–2017Vassar Stats. Vassar College, Poughkeepsie [URL].
Mair, Christian
2014 “Do We Got a Difference? Divergent Developments of Semi-Auxiliary (Have) Got (to) in British and American English”. In Marianne Hundt, ed. Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nokkonen, Soili
2010 “ ‘How Many Taxis There Needs to Be?’ The Sociolinguistic Variation of Need to in Spoken British English”. Corpora 51: 45–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank
1990Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Penry Williams, Cara
2018 “The Analytic Importance of Metapragmatics in Variationist Methodology: Voicings within Australian English”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
2019a “Appeals to Semiotic Registers in Ethno-Metapragmatic Accounts of Variation”. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 291: 294–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019bFolklinguistics and Social Meaning in Australian English. Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penry Williams, Cara and Minna Korhonen
2018 “Variation and Change in Possession and Root Modality in Australian English: The Declining Fortunes of Have Got ”. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 22, University of Auckland.
Smith, Nicholas
2003 “Changes in the Modals and Semi-Modals of Strong Obligation and Epistemic Necessity in Recent British English”. In Roberta Facchinetti, Frank Palmer, and Manfred Krug, eds. Modality in Contemporary English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 241–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2004 “ Have to, Gotta, Must?: Grammaticalisation, Variation and Specialization in English Deontic Modality”. In Hans Lindquist, and Christian Mair, eds. Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Roots of English: Exploring the History of Dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Alexandra D’Arcy
2007 “The Modals of Obligation/Necessity in Canadian Perspective”. English World-Wide 281: 47–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. and Jennifer Smith
Tannen, Deborah
1986 “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. In Florian Coulmas, ed. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 311–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
Walker, James A. and Michol F. Hoffman
2016 “Ethnolinguistic Variation in Toronto English: Possession and Deontic Modality”. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of American Linguistics Society, Marriott Marquis Washington, DC.