Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 41:3 (2020) ► pp.325–351

Another story

Be like across discourse types

 | The University of Western Australia
 | The University of Western Australia
 | The University of Western Australia
Quotative be like has been described as “one of the most striking developments [in English]” (Tagliamonte and D’Arcy 2004: 493). Despite the vast research on quotatives and the upsurge of be like, the potential impact of discourse type on the grammar of quotation has rarely been assessed. Yet, discourse type has proved a relevant factor in linguistic variation (see Travis 2007; Buchstaller 2011; Travis and Lindstrom 2016). Drawing on vernacular spoken data from our multigenerational corpus of Australian English, we include discourse type as a predictor in our recursive partitioning and logistic regression models. Our results show that similar linguistic constraints operate on be like across discourse types. However, significant differences emerge regarding its social conditioning in narrative as opposed to non-narrative discourse, pointing to a strong association between be like and female storytelling.
Keywords: be like , quotation, discourse type, narrative, language variation and change, Australian English
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Discourse type and quotation
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Narrative
    • 3.2Defining and operationalizing discourse type
    • 3.3Circumscribing the variable context
    • 3.4Social and linguistic factors
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Trees and forests
    • 4.2Mixed-effects modelling
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.00053.rod
References (58)
Sources
Richard, Sophie. 2013–2016. UWA Narrative Corpus. Compiled at University of Western Australia, Discipline of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste. 2011–2019. UWA Corpus of English in Australia. Compiled at University of Western Australia, Discipline of Linguistics.Google Scholar
References
Blyth, Carl, Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang. 1990. “‘I’m Like, ‘Say What?!’’: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative”. American Speech 651: 215–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, LeAnn and Sali Tagliamonte. 2012. “A Very Interesting Story: The Influence of Narrative in Linguistic Change”. Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 181: Article 2.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2006a. “Diagnostics of Age-Graded Linguistic Behaviour: The Case of the Quotative System”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 101: 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. “Social Stereotypes, Personality Traits and Regional Perception Displaced: Attitudes Towards the ‘New’ Quotatives in the U.K.”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 101: 362–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Quotations Across the Generations: A Multivariate Analysis of Speech and Thought Introducers Across 5 Decades of Tyneside Speech”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 71: 59–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Exploring Linguistic Malleability Across the Life Span: Age-Specific Patterns in Quotative Use”. Language in Society 441: 457–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. “Localized Globalization: A Multi-Local, Multivariate Investigation of Quotative Be Like ”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 131: 291–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ronald. 1980. “Narrative Go ‘Say’”. American Speech 551: 304–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. “Editor’s Note [on ‘Be Like’]”. American Speech 571: 149.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 2000. “The Telling or the Tale? Narratives and Gender in Adolescent Friendship Networks”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 41: 234–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 1996. Women Talk: Conversation Between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2002. “ She Say, She Go, She Be Like: Verbs of Quotation Over Time in African American Vernacular English”. American Speech 771: 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2004. “Contextualizing St. John’s Youth English Within the Canadian Quotative System”. Journal of English Linguistics 321: 323–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “The Diachrony of Quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English”. Language Variation and Change 241: 343–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018a. Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context: Eight Hundred Years of Like. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2018b. “Linguists Be Like: ‘Where Did It Come From?’”. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 47, New York University.
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer. 2000. “The Sociolinguistic Distribution of and Attitudes Toward Focuser Like and Quotative Like ”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 41: 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2020. “The Role of Sociocognitive Salience in the L2 Acquisition of Structured Variation and Linguistic Diffusion: Evidence from Quotative Be Like .” Language in Society 491: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davydova, Julia and Isabelle Buchstaller. 2015. “Expanding the Circle to Learner English: Investigating Quotative Marking in a German Student Community”. American Speech 901: 441–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Denis, Derek, Matt Gardner, Marisa Brook, and Sali Tagliamonte. 2019. “Peaks and Arrowheads of Vernacular Organization”. Language Variation and Change 311: 43–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen and Barbara Bell. 1995. “Sociolinguistic Variation and Discourse Function of Constructed Dialogue Introducers: The Case of Be + Like ”. American Speech 701: 265–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fox, Sue. 2012. “Performed Narrative: The Pragmatic Function of This Is + Speaker and Other Quotatives in London Adolescent Speech”. In Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, eds. Quotatives: Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory. 1988. “Advanced Varbrul Analysis”. In Kathleen Ferrara, Becky Brown, Keith Walters, and John Baugh, eds. Linguistic Change and Contact. Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin, 124–136.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1997. “Story-Telling in New Zealand Women’s and Men’s Talk.” In Ruth Wodak, ed. Gender and Discourse. London: Sage, 263–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. “Getting Off the Goldvarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 1987. “‘He Says... So I Said’: Verb Tense Alternation and Narrative Depictions of Authority in American English”. Linguistics 251: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Field Methods of the Project on Linguistic Change and Variation”. In John Baugh and Joel Sherzer, eds. Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 28–54.Google Scholar
. 1997. “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis”. The Journal of Narrative and Life History 71: 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience”. In June Helm, ed. Essays in the Verbal and Visual Arts. Seattle: Washington University Press, 12–44.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald. 2001. “ You’re Like ‘Why Not?’: The Quotative Expression of Glasgow Adolescents”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 51: 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R. and Faye McNair-Knox. 1994. “Addressee- and Topic-Influenced Style Shift”. In Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan, eds. Sociolinguistics Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 235–276.Google Scholar
Richard, Sophie. 2018. “Tense/Aspect Variation and the Present Perfect in Australian English Narratives: Sociolinguistic Constraints and Discourse-Pragmatic Functions”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste. 2013. “Quotatives Down Under: Be Like in Cross-Generational Australian English Speech”. English World-Wide 341: 48–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. “Quotatives Across Time: West Australian English Then and Now”. In Heike Pichler, ed. Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste and Marie-Eve Ritz. 2014. “Stories Down Under: Tense Variation at the Heart of Australian English Narratives”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 341: 540–556.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne and Deborah Lange. 1991. “The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought”. American Speech 661: 227–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schnell, Stefan and Danielle Barth. 2018. “Discourse Motivations for Pronominal and Zero Objects Across Registers in Vera’a”. Language Variation and Change 301: 51–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scrivner, Olga and Manuel Díaz-Campos. n.d. “Language Variation Suite” <[URL]> (accessed November 20, 2019; May 10, 2020).
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2004. “ He’s Like, She’s Like: The Quotative System in Canadian Youth”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 81: 493–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Frequency and Variation in the Community Grammar: Tracking a New Change Through the Generations”. Language Variation and Change 191: 119–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Peaks Beyond Phonology: Adolescence, Incrementation and Language Change”. Language 851: 58–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, Alexandra D’Arcy, and Celeste Rodríguez Louro. 2016. “Outliers, Impact and Rationalization in Linguistic Change”. Language 921: 824–849. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Derek Denis. 2014. “Expanding the Transmission/Diffusion Dichotomy: Evidence from Canada”. Language 901: 90–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Rachael Hudson. 1999. “ Be Like et al. Beyond America: The Quotative System in British and Canadian Youth”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 31: 147–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. “Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative”. In Florian Coulmas, ed. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin: De Gruyter, 311–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine. 2007. “Genre Effects on Subject Expression in Spanish: Priming in Narrative and Conversation”. Language Variation and Change 191: 101–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Catherine and Amy M. Lindstrom. 2016. “Different Registers, Different Grammars? Subject Expression in English Conversation and Narrative”. Language Variation and Change 281: 103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, Joanne. 2002. “Discourse Quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents Performing Voices”. Australian Journal of Linguistics 221: 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa. 1978. “A Feature of Performed Narrative: The Conversational Historical Present”. Language in Society 71: 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1982. The Conversational Historical Present in American English Narrative. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Rodríguez Louro, Celeste, Glenys Dale Collard, Madeleine Clews & Matt Hunt Gardner
2023. Quotation in earlier and contemporary Australian Aboriginal English. Language Variation and Change 35:2 ► pp. 129 ff. DOI logo
Clews, Madeleine, Celeste Rodríguez Louro & Glenys Collard
2021. Indigenizing say in Australian Aboriginal English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:4 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.