The Survival of the Subjunctive
Evidence of its use in Australia and Elsewhere
Pam Peters | Macquarie University
The status of the subjunctive is examined in this Australian study of its manifestations in subordinate clauses: in mandative constructions as well as those expressing purpose, condition, concession and the counterfactual. Data from the Australian ACE corpus (1986) is compared with (a) those from the American Brown corpus and the British LOB corpus (both 1961); and with (b) findings from an Australian elicitation survey of 1993. Both the diachronic corpus comparisons and the sociolinguistic profiles associated with the survey indicate declining use of the subjunctive in adverbial clauses, most notably the counterfactual type, but also those expressing purpose, concession and ordinary conditions. However the use of mandative subjunctives is stable, written into a range of corpus materials (fiction and non-fiction), and endorsed by Australians across the age range. The resilience of the mandative subjunctive in Australian (and American) usage contrasts with the prevailing view of British usage commentators, that the subjunctive, if not obsolescent, should not be preserved.
Published online: 01 January 1998
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.19.1.06pet
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.19.1.06pet
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Balasubramanian, Chandrika
Brinton, Laurel J.
Collins, Peter, Ariane Macalinga Borlongan, Joo-Hyuk Lim & Xinyue Yao
Collins, Peter & Xinyue Yao
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
Deuber, Dagmar, Stephanie Hackert, Eva Canan Hänsel, Alexander Laube, Mahyar Hejrani & Catherine Laliberté
Hundt, Marianne
Kastronic, Laura & Shana Poplack
Lee, Jackie
Mark Davies
Vaughan, Jill & Jean Mulder
Yao, Xinyue & Peter Collins
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.