The modals of obligation/necessity in Canadian perspective
Sali A. Tagliamonte | University of Toronto
Alexandra D'Arcy | University of Canterbury
The modal verbs of English have been undergoing change since the Late Old English and Early Middle English periods. Recent research suggests dramatic recent developments, particularly in American English. In this paper, we focus on the encoding of obligation/necessity, which involves the layering of must, have (got) to, got to, and need to. Building on a longitudinal research program on (spoken) English dialect corpora, the present investigation examines data from a 1.5 million word corpus of the indigenous population of Toronto, Canada, the country’s largest urban centre. Variation analysis reveals that the system of obligation/necessity in this community has undergone nearly complete specialization to have to. Moreover, a comparison of these results with earlier studies suggests that the underlying system is organized differently than elsewhere. We argue that while change is sensitive to the social evaluation of forms, internal (grammatical) constraints may differ across major varieties. Canadian English appears to be on the forefront of change.
Keywords: grammaticalization, deontic modality, epistemic modality, obligation/necessity, Canadian English
Published online: 06 April 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.28.1.04tag
Cited by
Cited by 35 other publications
No author info given
2009. New-Dialect Formation in Canada: Evidence from the English Modal Auxiliariesby Stefan Dollinger.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:2 ► pp. 269 ff. 
No author info given
2011.
In The Present Perfect in Non-Native Englishes,
No author info given
2013.
In A Dictionary of Varieties of English,
► pp. 363 ff.
No author info given
2015.
In The Written Questionnaire in Social Dialectology [IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society, 40],
No author info given
2017. .
English World-Wide 38:1
Aaron, Jessi Elana
2010. Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context.
Language Variation and Change 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn & Elizabeth Cowper
2016. Possession and necessity: From individuals to worlds.
Lingua 182 ► pp. 30 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2015.
In Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 4],
► pp. 13 ff.
Cournane, Ailís
2014. In Search of L1 Evidence for Diachronic Reanalysis: Mapping Modal Verbs.
Language Acquisition 21:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Cournane, Ailís
2019. A developmental view on incrementation in language change.
Theoretical Linguistics 45:3-4 ► pp. 127 ff.
Cournane, Ailís & Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux
2020. Leaving Obligations Behind: Epistemic Incrementation in Preschool English.
Language Learning and Development 16:3 ► pp. 270 ff.
Cowper, Elizabeth & Daniel Currie Hall
2017. The rise of contrastive modality in English.
Linguistic Variation 17:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
D'Arcy, Alexandra
2015.
In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67],
► pp. 43 ff.
Denis, Derek & Alexandra D’Arcy
2019. Deriving Homogeneity in a Settler Colonial Variety of English.
American Speech 94:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
DENIS, DEREK & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2018. The changingfuture: competition, specialization and reorganization in the contemporary English future temporal reference system.
English Language and Linguistics 22:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Deuber, Dagmar
2010. Modal Verb Usage at the Interface of English and a Related Creole: A Corpus-based Study of Can/Could and Will/Would in Trinidadian English.
Journal of English Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 105 ff.
Dollinger, Stefan
2019.
In The Handbook of World Englishes,
► pp. 52 ff.
DOLLINGER, STEFAN & SANDRA CLARKE
2012. On the autonomy and homogeneity of Canadian English.
World Englishes 31:4 ► pp. 449 ff.
FEHRINGER, CAROL & KAREN CORRIGAN
2015. ‘You’ve got to sort of eh hoy the Geordie out’: modals of obligation and necessity in fifty years of Tyneside English.
English Language and Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 355 ff.
HANSEN, BEKE
2017. The ICE metadata and the study of Hong Kong English.
World Englishes 36:3 ► pp. 471 ff.
Hirano, Keiko & David Britain
2016.
In New Approaches to English Linguistics [Studies in Language Companion Series, 177],
► pp. 13 ff.
Hirota, Tomoharu
2020.
In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214],
► pp. 118 ff.
Kızılay, Yeliz
2019. Derlem temelli İngilizce’de yarım kip yapısı “Need to” (-meli/-malı) ve zorunluluk kipleri “Must & Have to” (-mek zorunda).
RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi ► pp. 240 ff.
Lorenz, David
2013. On-Going Change in English Modality: Emancipation Through Frequency.
Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 43:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Lorenz, David
2020.
In Nodes and Networks in Diachronic Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 27],
► pp. 244 ff.
Lorenz, David & David Tizón-Couto
2017. Coalescence and contraction of V-to-Vinf sequences in American English – Evidence from spoken language
.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía
2016.
In World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G57],
► pp. 143 ff.
Mair, Christian
2015.
In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67],
► pp. 119 ff.
Paulasto, Heli
2017. Collins, ed. 2015. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 38:1 ► pp. 114 ff.
Penry Williams, Cara & Minna Korhonen
2020. A sociolinguistic perspective on the (quasi-)modals of obligation and necessity in Australian English.
English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 41:3 ► pp. 267 ff.
Rubinstein, Aynat
2014. On Necessity and Comparison.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95:4 ► pp. 512 ff.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Lieselotte Anderwald
2017.
In The Handbook of Dialectology,
► pp. 300 ff.
TAGLIAMONTE, SALI A.
2008. So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada.
English Language and Linguistics 12:2 ► pp. 361 ff.
Yanovich, Igor
2020.
In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Semantics,
► pp. 1 ff.
민수정
2012. EFL Learners’ Use of the Modals of Possibility in Cross-Cultural Communication: A Corpus-Based Account.
The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 54:1 ► pp. 223 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.