Article published in:
English World-Wide
Vol. 35:2 (2014) ► pp. 193224
References
Aaron, Jane E
2004 The Little, Brown Compact Handbook . 5th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Angermeyer, Philipp S. and John Victor Singler
2003“The case for politeness: pronoun variation in co-ordinate NPs in object position in English”. Language Variation and Change 151: 171–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles
1976 Early Modern English . London: Deutsch. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan
1993“The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English”. In James Milroy and Lesley Milroy, eds. Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles . London: Longman, 187–213.Google Scholar
2004 English in Modern Times . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Sue Fox and Eivind Torgersen
2008“Ethnicity, friendship network, and social practices as the motor of dialect change: linguistic innovation in London”. Sociolinguistica 221: 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Sandra
2010 Dialects of English: Newfoundland and Labrador English . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
1998 Syntax . In Suzanne Romaine, ed. Cambridge History of the English Language . Vol. 41: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92–329.Google Scholar
Easson, Gordon
2000“Cross-border effects of education on ‘correct’ speech”. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 181: 11–20.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E
1986“Grammatically deviant prestige constructions”. In Michael Brame, Heles Contreras and Frederick Newmeyer, eds. A Festschrift for Sol Saporta . Seattle: Noit Amrofer, 93–129.Google Scholar
Grano, Thomas
2006“‘Me and her’ meets ‘he and I’: case, person, and linear ordering in English coordinated pronouns”. Undergraduate honours thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Honey, John
1995“A new rule for the Queen and I?” English Today 111: 3–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt
2003“Notes on Pronominal Case in English”. Studia Neophilologica 751: 21–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi
1998 Coordination . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran
1986“Us Anglos are a cut above the field: on objective pronouns in nominative contexts”. English Studies 671: 445–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1987 Functional Syntax . Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1971“Some principles of linguistic methodology”. Language in Society 11: 97–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar
1984“Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation”. In John Baugh and Joel Sherzer, eds. Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 28–54.Google Scholar
1990“The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change”. Language Variation and Change 21: 205–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Sterling Andrus
1929 The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700–1800. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2003 Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Paolillo, John
2002 Analyzing Linguistic Variation: Statistical Models and Methods . Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Google Scholar
Parrott, Jeffrey K
2009“Case variation in coordination: Danish vs. Faroese”. NORMS Papers on Faroese: Nordlyd 361: 165–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Frank, Kathryn Riley and Charles Meyer
1988“Case assignment and the ordering of constituents in coordinate constructions”. American Speech 631: 214–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana
1983“Bilingual competence: linguistic interference or grammatical integrity?” In Lucia Elías Olivares, ed. Spanish in the U.S. Setting: Beyond the Southwest . Arlington: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, 107–31.Google Scholar
2008“Quebec English”. Anglistik International Journal of English Studies 191: 189–200.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, James Walker and Rebecca Malcolmson
2006“An English ‘like no other’?: Language contact and change in Quebec.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics 511: 185–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana and Sali Tagliamonte
2001 African American English in the Diaspora . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Prazeres, Robert
2012“A Study of Pronoun Case Variation in English Coordinates”. M.A. memoir, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana
1998“Structure for coordination. Part I”. Glot International 31: 3–6.Google Scholar
Quinn, Heidi
2005 The Distribution of Pronoun Case Forms in English . Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David
1982“Sociolinguistic method and linguistic theory”. In L. Jonathan Cohen, Jerzy Los, Helmut Pfeiffer and Klaus-Peter Podewski, eds. Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VI . Amsterdam: North Holland, 677–85.Google Scholar
1988“Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation”. In Frederick Newmeyer, ed. Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sali Tagliamonte and Eric Smith
2005 Goldvarb X. Computer program. Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto, Canada. http://​individual​.utoronto​.ca​/tagliamonte​/Goldvarb​/GV​_index​.htm (defunct 17 Apr. 2013).
Sankoff, Gillian and William Labov
1985“Variation theory”. Paper presented at NWAV XIV Georgetown University, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Graham
1992“Case assignment in simple and coordinate constructions in present-day English”. American Speech 671: 432–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson. T
2001“On the nature of default case”. Syntax 41: 205–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas
1997“Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses”. Linguistic Inquiry 281: 318–43.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1966 A New English Grammar — Logical and Historical . Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2002“Comparative sociolinguistics”. In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill and Natalie Schilling-Estes, eds. Handbook of Language Variation and Change . Oxford: Blackwell, 729–63.Google Scholar
2006 Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation . New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation Interpretation . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostade Ingrid
1994“Standard and non-standard pronominal usage in English, with special reference to the eighteenth century”. In Dieter Stein and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade, eds. Towards a Standard Language 1600–1800. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 217–42. Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1992“Syntax”. In Richard M. Hogg, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language . Vol 11: The Beginnings to 1066 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 168–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter and Jack Chambers
1991“Introduction: English dialect grammar”. In Peter Trudgill and Jack Chambers, eds. Dialects of English . London: Longman, 1–10.Google Scholar
Visser, Fredericus
1970 An Historical Syntax of the English Language . Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Wagner, Susanne
2002 Ms. “We ‘don’ ‘say’ she, ‘do us? Pronoun exchange — a feature of English dialects?” Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, James A
2010 Variation in Linguistic Systems . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas
1997“Remarks on grammatical weight”. Language Variation and Change 91: 81–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin Herzog
1968“Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In Winfred Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel, eds. Directions for Historical Linguistics . Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–188.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph
1905 English Dialect Grammar . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar