Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 37:3 (2016) ► pp.238–266

Canny good, or quite canny?

The semantic-syntactic distribution of canny in the North East of England

| Northumbria University

The word canny has long been associated with the dialects of the North East of England, most typically in its adjectival sense. However, it has four distinct functions (adjective, adverb, intensifier and modifier in quantifying expressions), which this paper tracks in a diachronic speech corpus. Although the intensifier (e.g. it’s canny good) is documented in the Survey of English Dialects (Upton, Parry and Widowson 1994), it appears in the corpus later than expected with the profile of an incoming form. Results from a judgement task corroborate the corpus trends and show that people’s intuitions about intensifier canny correlate with age as well as the semantics and position of the following adjective, in such a way that shows the intensifier is not fully delexicalised. The present research highlights the value of combining production and perception data in establishing how the origins of a linguistic item affect its distribution in its new function.

Keywords: perception, grammaticalisation, judgement data, language change, intensification, Tyneside, frequency, function
Published online: 18 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.3.01chi
References
Corrigan, Karen P., Isabelle Buchstaller, Adam J. Mearns and Hermann L. Moisl
2010–2012 “A Linguistic ‘Time-Capsule’ for the Google Generation: The Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English”. [URL] (accessed December 1, 2014).
Griffiths, Bill
2004 A Dictionary of North East Dialect. Newcastle upon Tyne: Northumbria University Press.Google Scholar
Heslop, Richard O
1892 Northumberland Words: A Glossary of Words Used in the County of Northumberland and on the Tyneside. Volume 11. London: English Dialect Society.Google Scholar
OED Online
2015 Oxford University Press. [URL] (accessed April 10, 2015).
Office for National Statistics
2010 Standard Occupational Classification 2010, Volume 3: The National Statistics Socio-economic Classification User Manual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold
1962 Survey of English Dialects (A): Introduction. Leeds: E J Arnold.Google Scholar
Orton, Harold, and Wilfrid J. Halliday
eds. 1963 Survey of English Dialects (B): The Basic Materials, Volume 1: The Six Northern Counties and the Isle of Man, Part III. Leeds: E J Arnold.Google Scholar
Upton, Clive, David Parry, and J.D.A. Widdowson
1994 Survey of English Dialects: The Dictionary and Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, Joseph
1898–1905 The English Dialect Dictionary. Volume 11. London: Henry Frowde.Google Scholar
Allen, Will H., Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, Warren Maguire, and Hermann L. Moisl
2007 “A Linguistic ‘Time-Capsule’: The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English”. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan, and Hermann L. Moisl, eds. Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora, Volume 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. 16–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt
1991 “Amplifier Collocations in Spoken English”. In Stig Johansson and Anna-Brita Strenström, eds. English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 127–148. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Robert
2004 “Regression Models for Ordinal Data”. In Michael S. Lewis-Beck, Alan E. Bryman, and Tim Futing Liao, eds. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, Volume 31. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 941–942.Google Scholar
Anthony, Laurence
2014 AntConc (Version 3.4.1). Tokyo: Waseda University. Available from [URL] (accessed November 10, 2014).
Atkinson, John C
1868 A Glossary of the Cleveland Dialect: Explanatory, Derivative and Critical. London: John Russell Smith.Google Scholar
Barnfield, Katie, and Isabelle Buchstaller
2010 “Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal Developments and New Trends”. English World-Wide 311: 252–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beal, Joan C
2004 “English Dialects in the North of England: Morphology and Syntax”. In Bernd Kortmann, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider, and Clive Upton, eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English, Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 114–141.Google Scholar
2009 “Enregisterment, Commodification and Historical Context: ‘Geordie’ Versus ‘Sheffieldish’”. American Speech 841: 138–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, and Marilyn Ford
2010 “Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English”. Language 861: 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2006 “ The lady was al demonyak: Historical Aspects of Adverb all ”. English Language and Linguistics 101: 345–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, John R. Rickford, Elizabeth Closs Traugott, Thomas Wasow, and Arnold Zwicky
2010 “The Sociolinguistics of a Short-lived Innovation: Tracing the Development of Quotative all Across Spoken and Internet Newsgroup Data”. Language Variation and Change 221: 191–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, and Karen P. Corrigan
2011a “How to Make Intuitions Succeed: Testing Methods for Analysing Syntactic Microvariation”. In Warren Maguire and April McMahon, eds. Analysing Variation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 30–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “ ‘Judge not lest ye be judged’: Exploring Methods for the Collection of Socio-syntactic Data”. In Frans Gregersen, Jeffrey K. Parrott, and Pia Quist, eds. Language Variation – European Perspectives III: Selected Papers from the 5th International Conference on Language Variation in Europe (ICLaVE 5). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 149–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle, Karen P. Corrigan, Anders Holmberg, Patrick Honeybone, and Warren Maguire
2013 “T-to-R and the Northern Subject Rule: Questionnaire-based Spatial, Social and Structural Linguistics”. English Language and Linguistics 171: 85–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L
2007 Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, and Ann Williams
2005 “Phonology, Grammar, and Discourse in Dialect Convergence”. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, eds. Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 135–170. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, Claire
2013 “Verbal –s and the Northern Subject Rule: Spatial Variation in Linguistic and Sociolinguistic Constraints”. In Xosé Álvarez, Ernestina Carrilho, and Catarina Magro, eds. Current Approaches to Limits and Areas in Dialectology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars. 311–344.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Karen P., Richard Edge, and John Lonergan
2012 “Is Dublin English ‘Alive Alive Oh’?” In Bettina Migge and Máire Ní Chíosáin, eds. New Perspectives on Irish English. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cukor-Avila, Patricia, and Guy Bailey
2013 “Real Time and Apparent Time”. In Jack K. Chambers and Natalie Schilling, eds. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (2nd ed). Malden, MA: Blackwell. 239–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1977 “Where Have All the Adjectives Gone?” Studies in Language 11: 19–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny S
1997 Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
2004 “Degree Quantifiers”. In Francis Corblin and Henriëtte de Swart, eds. Handbook of French Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 83–98.Google Scholar
2007 “Adverbs and Quantification: Degrees Versus Frequency”. Lingua 1171: 685–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elmes, Simon
2005 Talking for Britain: A Journey Through the Nation’s Dialects. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gorman, Kyle, and Daniel E. Johnson
2013 “Quantitative Analysis”. In Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron, and Ceil Lucas, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 214–240.Google Scholar
Heeringa, Steven G., Brady T. West, and Patricia A. Berglund
2010 Applied Survey Data Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas
2006 “Corpora and Introspection as Corroborating Evidence: The Case of Preposition Placement in English Relative Clauses”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21: 165–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Rika, and Sali A. Tagliamonte
2003 “ Well weird, Right dodgy, Very strange, Really cool: Layering and Recycling in English Intensifiers”. Language in Society 321: 257–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Howard
1990 Grammar and Meaning: A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel E
2009 “Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for Mixed-Effects Variable Rule Analysis”. Language and Linguistics Compass 31: 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara
2009 “Pittsburghese Shirts: Commodification and the Enregisterment of an Urban Dialect”. American Speech 841: 157–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
2006 The Social Stratification of English in New York City (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llamas, Carmen
1999 “A New Methodology: Data Elicitation for Social and Regional Language Variation Studies”. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 71: 95–119.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter R
2002 “ Really worthwhile or not really significant? A Corpus-based Approach to the Delexicalization and Grammaticalization of Intensifiers in Modern English”. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald, eds. New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 143–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
2002 “Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting? Adverbs and Social Class”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 61: 398–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Pure Grammaticalization: The Development of a Teenage Intensifier”. Language Variation and Change 181: 267–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2003 “On Intensifiers and Grammaticalization: The Case of swiþe ”. English Studies 841: 372–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
2000 “Early Modern English Lexis and Semantics”. In Roger Lass, ed. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume 31: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 332–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Neeleman, Ad, Hans van de Koot, and Jenny S. Doetjes
2004 “Degree Expressions”. The Linguistic Review 211: 1–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
1993 “Corpus Evidence of Language Change: The Case of intensifiers”. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis, and Elena Tognini-Bonelli, eds. Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 177–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Michael
2011 “ ‘It isn’t geet good, like, but it’s canny’: A New(ish) Dialect Feature in North East England”. English Today 271: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike
2010 “Methods in Discourse Variation Analysis: Reflections on the Way Forward”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 141: 581–608. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ravindranath, Maya
2011 A Wicked Good Reason to Study Intensifiers in New Hampshire. Poster presented at New Ways of Analysing Variation (NWAV) 401, Georgetown University.
Schütze, Carson T
1996 The Empirical Base of Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgments and Linguistic Methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2012 WordSmith Tools Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A
2005 “ So who? Like how? Just what? Discourse Markers in the Conversations of Young Canadians”. Journal of Pragmatics 371: 1896–1915. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “ So different and pretty cool! Recycling Intensifiers in Toronto, Canada”. English Language and Linguistics 121: 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and Chris Roberts
2005 “So weird; So cool; So innovative: The Use of Intensifiers in the Television Series Friends ”. American Speech 801: 280–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanderStoep, Scott W., and Deirdre D. Johnston
2009 Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Wagner, Elvis
2010 “Survey Research”. In Brian Paltridge and Aek Phakiti, eds. Continuum Companion to Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. London: Continuum. 22–38.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
2002 “ ‘North of Watford Gap’: A Cultural History of Northern English (From 1700)”. In Richard J. Watts and Peter Trudgill, eds. Alternative Histories of English. London: Routledge. 45–66.Google Scholar
2010 “Northern English in Writing”. In Raymond Hickey, ed. Varieties of English in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. 61–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar