Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 37:3 (2016) ► pp.267–292

Familiarity, comprehension and use of Indian English only

L1 Indian English speakers’ psycholinguistic judgments and interview responses

| Boston University
Indian English only (IndE-only), e.g. “I’ll meet you here only”, is rejected as poor English by many IndE speakers. In the present study, we used a mixed method to investigate familiarity, comprehension and use of IndE-only in 20 L1 IndE speakers in the US. Participants completed a psycholinguistic task comprising syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic judgments of IndE, standard English, and grammatically or semantically odd control sentences. L1 IndE speakers’ task performance was compared to a control group of 33 American English speakers. Results showed that IndE speakers were familiar with syntactic aspects of IndE-only consistent with the literature, and were able to extract significantly more information about implicatures and conversational contexts compared to the control group. L1 IndE speakers were also interviewed about their attitudes towards IndE and IndE-only. Qualitative results indicated that despite some stigmatization, mostly in the written form, IndE-only exemplifies the emerging identity of L1 IndE.
Keywords: speaker judgments, psycholinguistics, pragmatics, syntax, dialectology, focus markers, sociolinguistics, mixed-methodology, Indian English
Published online: 18 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.3.02nay
References (26)
Agnihotri, Rajesh K. 1999. “India: English in India.” In Rajendra Singh, ed. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics. New Delhi: Sage Publications, 184–198.Google Scholar
Asher, R.E. 1985. Tamil. Amsterdam: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, Chandrika. 2009. “Circumstance Adverbials in Registers of Indian English.” World Englishes 281: 485–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2003. “Social Stigma and Grammatical Autonomy in Nonnative Varieties of English”. Language in Society 321: 23–46. DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2000. “Optimal Expressions in Indian English.” English Language and Linguistics 41: 69–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Indian English: Syntax.” In Bernd Kortmann, Kathryn Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, Edgar W. Schneider and Clive Upton, eds. Handbook of Varieties of English 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1016–1030.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2004, “Subcontinent Raises its Voice.” The Guardian 19 November 2004 <[URL]> (accessed November 21, 2014).Google Scholar
Desai, Sonalde, Amaresh Dubey, Brij Lal Joshi, Mitali Sen, Abusaleh Shariff, and Reeve Vanneman. 2010. Human Development in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Global Englishes: A Resource Book for Students (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kachru, Braj B. 1976. “Models of English for the Third World: White Man’s Linguistic Burden or Language Pragmatics.” Tesol Quarterly 101: 221–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. The Indianization of English: The English Language in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia. 2007. “Focus Marking in Indian English.” English World-Wide 281: 89–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marian, Viorica, Henrike K. Blumenfeld, and Margarita Kaushanskaya. 2007. “The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 501: 940–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. “Steady States in the Evolution of New Englishes: Present-Day Indian English as an Equilibrium.” Journal of English Linguistics 351: 157–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari V. 1997. Marathi. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parviainen, Hanna. 2012. “Focus Particles in Indian English and Other Varieties.” World Englishes 311: 226–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schilk, Marco. 2011. Structural Nativization in Indian English Lexicogrammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedlatschek, Andreas. 2009. Contemporary Indian English: Variation and Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2003. “Discourse Clitics and Constructive Morphology in Hindi.” In Miriam Butt, and Tracy H. King, eds. Nominals Inside and Out. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 59–84Google Scholar
. 2005. “Dialect Stabilization and Speaker Awareness in Non-Native Varieties of English.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 91: 194–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The International Corpus of English: India. 2002. Department of English, Shivaji University, Kolhapur and Freie Universität, Berlin.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Jil. 2009. “It’s Like This, Only.” The Morning News May 28, 2009. <[URL]> (accessed November 21, 2014).Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Aishwarya, N. & D. Ruth Deborah
2021. Comparison of Narrative Comprehension and Inference-Making Ability in Native Tamil Speakers in Monolingual and Bilingual Context. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 35:4 ► pp. 616 ff. DOI logo
Parviainen, Hanna & Robert Fuchs
2019. ‘I don’t get time only’: an apparent-time investigation of clause-final focus particles in Asian Englishes. Asian Englishes 21:3 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.