Article published in:
English World-Wide
Vol. 38:2 (2017) ► pp. 211237
Alsagoff, Lubna, and Ho Chee Lick
1998 “The Relative Clause in Colloquial Singapore English”. World Englishes 171: 127–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Asher, Ronald E., and T. C. Kumari
1997Malayalam. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, Ayo
1998 “Torn between the Norms: Innovations in World Englishes”. World Englishes 171: 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biewer, Carolin
2015South Pacific Englishes. A Sociolinguistic and Morphosyntactic Profile of Fiji English, Samoan English and Cook Islands English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, Kingsley
2006 “World Englishes Today”. In Braj B. Kachru, Yamuna Kachru, and Cecil L. Nelson, eds. The Handbook of World Englishes. Oxford: Blackwell, 240–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Britain, David
2007 “Grammatical Variation in England”. In David Britain, ed. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Thomas
2014 “Structural Nativization, Typology and Complexity: Noun Phrase structures in British, Kenyan and Singaporean English”. English Language and Linguistics 181: 23–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2007Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, David Adger, and Sue Fox
2013 “Relative Who and the Actuation Problem”. Lingua 1261: 51–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, and Tania Kuteva
2013 “Relativization on Subjects”. In Matthew Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, eds. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/122 (accessed December 15, 2015).
Denison, David, and Marianne Hundt
2013 “Defining Relatives”. Journal of English Linguistics 411: 135–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, Holger
2009 “On the Role of Frequency and Similarity in the Acquisition of Subject and Non-subject Relative Clauses”. In Talmy Givón, and Masayoshi Shibatani, eds. Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 251–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2013 “Order of Relative Clause and Noun”. In Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath, eds. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/90 (accessed December 15, 2015)
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
2014 “Functional Syntax in Historical Perspective”. In Claire Bowern, and Beth Evans, eds. Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. London: Routledge, 308–325.Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2015 “At the Interface of Contact Linguistics and Second Language Research”. English World-Wide 361: 91–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas
2000 “Relative Clauses in Hong Kong English”. World Englishes 191: 357–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
1996 “Introducing ICE”. In Sidney Greenbaum, ed. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3–12.Google Scholar
Gut, Ulrike
2011 “Studying Structural Innovations in New English Varieties”. In Joybrato Mukherjee, and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 101–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gut, Ulrike, and Lilian Coronel
2012 “Relatives Worldwide”. In Marianne Hundt, and Ulrike Gut, eds. Mapping Unity and Diversity Worldwide: Corpus-Based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 215–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, Gregory R., and Robert Bayley
1995 “On the Choice of Relative Pronouns in English”. American Speech 701: 148–172 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackert, Stephanie
2012The Emergence of the English Native Speaker. A Chapter in Nineteenth-Century Linguistic Thought. Berlin: De Grutyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
2003 “Why are Zero-marked Phrases Close to their Heads?” In Gunther Rohdenburg, and Britta Mondorf, eds. Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 175–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva
2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendery, Rachel
2012Relative Clauses in Time and Space: A Case Study in Methods of Diachronic Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Tanja
2003 “Relative Clauses in Dialects of English: A Typological Approach”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Freiburg, Germany.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, and Axel Bohmann
2015 “ Which-hunting and the Standard English Relative Clause”. Language 911: 806–836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus
2012 “Syntactic and Variational Complexity in British and Ghanaian English Relative Clause Formation in the Written Parts of the International Corpus of English”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 218–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2016 “Error, Feature, (Incipient) Change – or Something else altogether?” In Elena Seoane, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez, eds. World Englishes: New Theoretical and Methodological Considerations. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 37–60.Google Scholar
2015 “World Englishes”. In Douglas Biber, and Randi Reppen, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 381–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, David Denison, and Gerold Schneider
2012 “Retrieving Relatives from Historical Data”. Language and Linguistic Computing 271: 3–16.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, Kenneth
1984 “The Use of Typological Markedness Conditions as Predictors in Second Language Acquisition”. In Roger A. Andersen, ed. Second Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, 39–58.Google Scholar
Jacobsson, Bengt
1994 “Nonrestrictive That-clauses Revisited”. Studia Neophilologica 661: 181–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kandiah, Thiru
1998 “The Emergence of New Englishes”. In Joseph A. Foley, Thiru Kandiah, Bao Zhiming, Anthea F. Gupta, Lubna Algasoff, Ho Chee Lick, Lionel Wee, I. S. Talib, and Wendy Bokhorst-Heng, eds. English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 73–105.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1985 “Relative clauses”. In Timothy Shopen, ed. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. II: Complex Constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–170.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L., and Bernd Comrie
1977 “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 81: 63–99.Google Scholar
Killingley, Siew-Yue
1993Cantonese. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2009 “World Englishes between Simplification and Complexification”. In Thomas Hoffmann, Lucia Siebers, and Egar W. Schneider, eds. World Englishes: Problems, Properties and Prospects. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 265–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd, and Kerstin Lunkenheimer
eds. 2013The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English [eWAVE]. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <Available at http://​www​.ewave​-atlas​.org/ (accessed December 15, 2015).
Kretzschmar, William A.
2014 “Emergence of ‘New Varieties’ in Speech as a Complex System”. In Sarah Buschfeld, Thomas Hoffmann, Magnus Huber, and Alexander Kautzsch, eds. The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 142–159.Google Scholar
Lange, Claudia
2012The Syntax of Spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English. A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre
2015 “Transparency in Language. A Typological Study”. Ph.D. Dissertation. Utrecht: LOT. <Available at http://​dare​.uva​.nl​/document​/2​/155071 (accessed January 15, 2016).
Mair, Christian
2003 “Kreolismen und verbales Identitätsmanagement in geschriebenen jamaikanischen Englisch. In Elisabeth Vogel, Antonia Napp, and Wolfram Lutterer, eds. Zwischen Ausgrenzung und Hybridisierung. Würzburg: Ergon, 79–96.Google Scholar
2013 “The World System of Englishes. Accounting for the Transnational Importance of Mobile and Mediated Vernacular”. English World-Wide 341: 253–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D.
2004 “Remarks on Adsentential Adnominal and Extraposed Relative Clauses in Hindi”. In Veneeta Dayal, and Anoop Mahajan, eds. Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 291–311, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M.
2011 “Bilingual Acquisition and Theories of Diachronic Change: Bilingualism as Cause and Effect of Grammatical Change”. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 141: 121–145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M., Martin Elsig, and Esther Rinke
2013Language Acquisition and Change. A Morphosyntactic Perspesctive. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend
2010 “New Englishes and the Native Speaker Debate”. Language Sciences 321: 594–601. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, and Rakesh M. Bhatt
2008World Englishes: The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim
2006 “Spoken and Written English”. In Bas Aarts, and April McMahon, eds. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 603–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko S.
2014 “Language Ecology, Language Evolution, and the Actuation Question”. In Tor Afarli, and Brit Maelhum, eds. Language Contact and Change: Grammatical Structure Encounters the Fluidity of Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 13–35.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Sebastian Hoffmann
2006 “Describing Verb-complementational Profiles of New Englishes: a Pilot Study of Indian English”. English World-Wide 271: 147–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Stefan Gries
2009 “Verb-construction Associations in the International Corpus of English”. English World-Wide 301: 27–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marco Schilk
2012 “Exploring Variation and Change in New Englishes: Looking into the International Corpus of English (ICE) and beyond”. In Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth C. Traugott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189–199.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1997 “On the Functions of left-dislocation in English Discourse”. In Akio Kamio, ed. Directions in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 117–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1999 “Syntax”. In Roger Lass, ed. The Cambride History of the English Language, Vol 31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 187–331.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
1996 “Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English”. Cognitive Linguistics 71: 149–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaub, Steffen
2016 “The Influence of Register on Noun Phrase Complexity on Varieties of English”. In Christof Schubert, and Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, eds. Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English. Berlin: De Gruyter, 251–270.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.
2004 “How to Trace Structural Nativization: Particle Verbs in World Englishes”. World Englishes 231: 227–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Exploring the Interface between World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition – and Implications for English as a Lingua Franca”. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca 11: 57–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2013 “The Expression of the Perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes”. English World-Wide 341: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena, Lucía Loureiro-Porto, and Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2016 “The ICE project looks at Iberia: The International Corpus of Gibraltar English”. Paper presented at 40th AEDEAN International Conference. University of Zaragoza at Huesca, 9–12 November 2016.
Sigley, Robert
1997 “The Influence of Formality and Channel on Relative Pronoun Choice in New Zealand English”. English Language and Linguistics 11: 207–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
1983 “What the Natives Have in Mind”. In Roger A. Andersen, ed. Pidginization and Creolization as Language Acquisition. Rowley: Newbury House, 246–253Google Scholar
Srivastav, Venetta
1991 “The Syntax and Semantics of Correlatives”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 91: 637–686. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steger, Maria, and Edgar W. Schneider
2012 “Complexity as a Function of Iconicity. The Case of Complement Clause Constructions in New Englishes”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Benkedict Szmrecsanyi, eds. Linguistic Complexity. Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact. Berlin: De Gruyter, 156–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2014 “Relative Clauses in Asian Englishes.” Journal of English Linguistics 421: 245–268, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “The Places where English is Spoken: Adverbial Relative Clauses in World Englishes”. World Englishes 341: 620–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali
2002 “Variation and Change in the British Relative Marker System”. In Patricia Poussa, ed. Dialect contact on the North Sea Littoral. Munich: Lincom Europa, 147–165.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G.
2001Language Contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G., and Terrence Kaufmann
1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
1997 “Overseas Relatives: British-American Differences in Relative Marker Usage”. In Jan Aarts, Inge de Mönnink, and Herman Wekker, eds. Studies in English Language and Teaching. In honour of Flor Aarts. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 153–165.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel, and Dawn Harvie
2000 “It’s all Relative: Relativization Strategies in Early African American English”. In Shana Poplack, ed. The English History of African American English. Oxford: Blackwell, 198–230.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel, and Michael Rey
1997 “Relativization Strategies in Earlier African American Vernacular English”. Language Variation and Change 91: 219–247 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The People’s Linguistic Survey of India
Bhasha Research and Publication Centre. <Available at http://​peopleslinguisticsurvey​.org/ (accessed October 15, 2016).
Trudgill, Peter
2009 “Sociolinguistic Typology and Complexification”. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil, and Peter Trudgill, eds. Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 98–109.Google Scholar
Van Rooy, Bertus
2011 “A Principled Distinction between Error and Conventionalized Innovation in African Englishes”. In Joybrato Mukherjee, and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner English. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins, 189–207.Google Scholar
Williams, Jessica
1987 “Non-native Varieties of English. A Special Case of Language Acquisition”. English World-Wide 81: 161–199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiliams, Jessica
1989 “Pronoun Copies, Pronominal Anaphora and Zero Anaphora in Second Language Production”. In Susan Gass, Carolyn Madden, Dennis Preston, and Larry Selinker, eds. Variation in Second-Language Acquisition. Vol. 1: Discourse and Pragmatics. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters, 153–189.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald
2009 “The Interplay of ‘Universals’ and Contact-induced Change in the Emergence of New Englishes”. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, and Heli Paulasto, eds. Vernacular Universals and Language Contacts: Evidence from Varieties of English and Beyond. London: Routledge, 206–230.Google Scholar
Windstedt, Richard O.
1913Malay Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie, Nicholas Lester, and Maria T. Martinez-Garcia
2014 “ That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English”, Language and Cognition 61: 271–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Virginia, and Stephen Matthews
1991 “Relative Complexity: Beyond Avoidance”. Chinese University of Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics 31: 112–124.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3  pp. 411 ff. Crossref logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8  pp. 1151 ff. Crossref logo
Suárez‐Gómez, Cristina & Elena Seoane
2021. The role of age and gender in grammatical variation in world Englishes. World Englishes Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.