Acton, W. R. and J. de Felix (1986). “Acculturation and mind”, in Culture-bound:Bridging the cultural gap in language teaching, ed. J. M. Valdes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1986, 20–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ames, Ruth M. (1977). “Prototype and parody in Chaucerian exegesis”, in The fourteenth century (Acta 4), eds P. E. Szarmach and B. S. Levy. Binghampton: Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, SUNY Binghampton, 87–105.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Appleyard, J. A. (1990). Becoming a reader: The experience of fiction from childhood to adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arnold, Matthew (1888). “John Keats” in his Essays in criticism: Second series. London: Macmillan, 100–121.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Axton, William (1963). “Tonal unity in Dombey and Son ”, PMLA 78: 341–8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Banfield, Ann (1982). Unspeakable sentences: Narration and representation in the language of fiction. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Banfield, Ann (1992). “Literary pragmatics”, in International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, ed. William Bright. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 353–357.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barthes, Roland (1974). S/Z. New York: Hill and Wang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barthes, Roland (1977). “The death of the author” [1968], in his Image-music-text: Essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath. Glasgow: Fontana, 142–148.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bedient, Calvin (1986). He do the police in different voices: “The Waste Land” and its protagonist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beider, Peter G. (1977). “Art and scatology in the Miller’s Tale ”, Chaucer Review 12: 90–102.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennett, Tony (1990). Outside literature. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benveniste, Émile (1966). Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. Paris: Gallimard.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benveniste, Émile (1971). Problems in general linguistics, [Miami Linguistic Series, 8]. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergonzi, Bernard (1990). Exploding English: Criticism, theory, culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bernstein, Basil (1971). Class, codes, and control, Vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bertills, Yvonne (2001). “Intertextualities continued: The connotations of proper nouns in Tove Jansson”, in Children’s literature as Communication: The ChiLPA project, ed. Roger D. Sell. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 71–83.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bex, Tony (1994). “The Relevance of Genre”, in Poetics, Linguistics, Society: Towards a New Interdisciplinarity, eds Roger D. Sell and Peter Verdonk. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 107–129.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birch, David and Michael O’Toole (eds) (1988). Functions of style. London: Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Birney, Earle (1960). “The inhibited and the uninhibited: Ironic structure in the Miller’s Tale ”, Neophilologus, 44: 333–8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Black, Max (1962). “Metaphor”, in Philosophy looks at the arts: Contemporary readings in aesthetics, ed. Joseph Margolis. New York: Scribner’s, 216–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blair, Hugh (1965). Lectures on rhetoric and belles lettres, 2 vols. [1783], ed. Harold F. Harding. Carbondale, Ill. : Southern Illinois University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, Harold (1973). The anxiety of influence: A theory of poetry. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, Harold (1994). The western canon: The books and school of the ages. New York: Harcourt Brace.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, Harold (ed.) (1979). Deconstruction and criticism. New York: Seabury.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bohm, David (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolton, W. F. (1962). “
The Miller’s Tale: An interpretation”, Mediaeval Studies 24: 83–94. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonheim, Helmut (1990). Literary systematics. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bremond, Claude (1966). “La logique des possibles narratifs”, Communications 8: 60–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bremond, Claude (1973). Logique de recit. Paris: Seuil.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brewer, Derek (1979). “The fabliaux”, in Companion to Chaucer studies, ed. Beryl Rowland, Revised Edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 296–325.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bronson, Bertrand H. (1940). “Chaucer’s art in relation to his audience”, in Five studies in literature, eds Bertrand H. Bronson et al.. Berkeley: University of California Publications in English, vol. 8 no. 1, 1–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bronson, Bertrand H. (1960). In search of Chaucer. Toronto: Toronto University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, N. (1975). “The analysis of foreign and familiar cultures,” in The culture revolution in foreign language teaching, ed. R. C. Lafayette. Skokie, IL: National Textbook Company, 19–31.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks-Davis, Douglas (1989). Great Expecations. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Gillian and George Yule (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson (1978). “Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena”, in Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, ed. Esther N. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–311.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brunetière, Ferdinand (1890). L’ évolution des genres dans l’histoire de la littérature, 2 vols. Paris: Hachette.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, John and Kathleen Tillotson (1957). Dickens at work. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buttjes, D. and M. Byram (eds) (1991). Mediating languages and cultures: Towards an intercultural theory of foreign language education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byram, M. (1989). Cultural studies in foreign language education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byram, M. and M. Fleming (eds) (1988). Language learning in an intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Byram, M., V. Esarte-Sarries, and S. Taylor (1991). Cultural studies and language learning: A research report. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carey, John (1990). John Donne: Life, mind and art. London: Faber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carlton, Lauri (1983). Dialogue games: An approach to discourse analysis. Dordrecht: Reidel.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, Peter (1980). Under Goliath. London: Puffin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carter, Ronald (1989). “Language and literature in English studies”, in English economis’d: English and British higher education in the eighties, ed. Martin Dodsworth. London: John Murray, 49–64.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cazden, C. B. (1998). “Socialization”, in Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. Jacob L. Mey. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 890–2.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. (1976). “Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view”, in Subject and topic, ed. C. N. Li. New York: Academic Press, 25–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. (1979). “The flow of thought and the flow of language”, in Syntax and semantics Volume 12: Discourse and syntax, ed. Talmy Givón. New York: Academic Press, 159–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. (1980). “The deployment of consciousness in the production of narrative”, in The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, ed. Wallace L. Chafe. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 9–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. (ed.) (1980). The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chatman, Seymour (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chaucer, Geoffrey (1957). The works of Geoffrey Chaucer, ed. F. N. Robinson, Second Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christ, Carol T. (1981). “T. S. Eliot and the Victorians”, Modern Philology 79: 157–165. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christ, Carol T. (1984). “Self-concealment and self-expression in Eliot’s and Pound’s dramatic monologues”, Victorian Poetry 22: 217–226.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cole, Peter (ed.) (1981). Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, Philip (1972). “A tale of two novels: A Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations in Dickens’s career”, Dickens Studies Annual 2: 336–51, 378–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Connor, Steven (1985). Charles Dickens. Oxford: Blackwell, 126–137.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Connor, Steven (1992). Theory and cultural value. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cooper, Marilyn M. (1982). “Context as vehicle: Implicatures in writing”, in What Writers Know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse, ed. Martin Nystrand. New York: Academic Press, 105–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cowell, Raymond (1975). The critical enterprise: English studies in higher education. London: Allen & Unwin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crookes, G. and R. W. Schmidt (1991). “Motivation: Re-opening the research agenda”, Language Learning 41: 469–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crowley, T. (1989). The politics of discourse: The standard language question and British cultural debates. London: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
D’Aguiar, Fred (1994). The longest journey. London: Chatto and Windus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, James A. (1989). The textual life of Dickens’s characters. London: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Beaugrande, Robert (1980). Text, discourse and process. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Beaugrande, Robert (1982). “Psychology and compositions: Past, present and future”, in What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse, ed. Martin Nystrand. New York: Academic Press, 211–67.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Beaugrande, Robert and Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Man, Paul (1971). Blindness and insight. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Saussure, Ferdinand (1978). “Course in general linguistics” [1916] London: Fontana.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Derrida, Jacques (1976). Of grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Derrida, Jacques (1988). Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickens, Charles (1965). The Pilgrim Edition of the letters of Charles Dickens Letters, eds Madeline House, Graham Storey and Kathleen Tillotson. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickens, Charles (1969). Hard Times [1854] Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickens, Charles (1971). Bleak House, [1873] Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dilnot, A. F. (1975). “The case of Mr. Jaggers”, Essays in Criticism 25: 437–443. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dodsworth, Martin (ed.) (1989). English economis’d: English and British higher education in the eighties. London: John Murray.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dollimore, Jonathan and Alan Slinfield (1985). Political Shakespeare: New essays in Cultural materialism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donaldson, E. Talbot (1950). “Idiom of popular poetry in ‘The Miller’s Tale’”, English Institute Essays, 116–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donaldson, E. Talbot (1954). “Chaucer the pilgrim”, PMLA 69: 928–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donner, H. W. (1951). Svenska översättningar av Shakespeares Macbeth [Acta Academiae Aboensis, Humaniora 10.1] Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dornyei, Z. (1998). “Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation”, Modern Language Journal 82: 545–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Douglas, Mary (1978). Natural symbols. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Doyle, A. I. and M. B. Parkes (1978). “The production of copies of the Canterbury Tales and the Confessio Amantis in the early fifteenth century”, in Medieval scribes, manuscripts and libraries: Essays presented to N. R. Ker, (eds) M. B. Parkes and Andrew G. Watson. London: Scolar Press, 163–210.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryden, John (1978). Dryden: A selection, ed. John Conaghan. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W. (1980). “Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse”, in Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 203–74).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dubrow, Heather (1982). Genre [The Critical Idiom series, no. 42] London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durkheim, Emile (1966). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eagleton, Terry (1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eagleton, Terry (1986). “Liberality and order: The criticism of John Bayley”, in his Against the grain: Essays 1975–1985. London: Verso, 33–47.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Edmondson, Willis (1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: Ages 8–15. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehrlich, S. (1990). Point of view: A linguistic analysis of literary style. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliot, T. S. (1951). “The Metaphysical poets” [1921], in his Selected essays. London: Faber, 281–291.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliot, T. S. (1951). “Tradition and the individual talent” [1919], in his Selected essays. London: Faber, 13–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliot, T. S. (1957). “What is a classic?” in his On poetry and poets. London: Faber, 53–71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eliot, T. S. (1969). The complete poems and plays of T. S. Eliot. London: Faber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elliott, Ralph W. V. (1973). Chaucer’s English. London: Andre Deutsch.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquistion. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engler, Balz (1990). Poetry and community. Tübingen: Stauffenburg verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Engler, Balz (1994). “Postdisciplinarity”, in Language and literature today, 3 vols, ed. Neide de Faria. Brasília: Universidade de Brasíla, vol. 2, 852–859.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, Nils Erik (1964). “On defining style”, in Linguistics and Style, (eds) Nils Erik Enkvist, J. Spencer and M. J. Gregory. London: Oxford University Press, 3–56.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, Nils Erik (1978). “Stylistics and text linguistics”, in Current trends in text linguistics, ed. Wolfgang U. Dressler. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 174–90.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, Nils Erik (1980). “Categories of situational context from the perspective of stylistics”, Language Teaching Abstracts 13: 58–79.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, Nils Erik (1991). “On the interpretability of texts in general and of literary texts in particular”, in Literary pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge, 1–25.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, Nils Erik (1993). “Engelska språket och litteraturen”, in Åbo Akademi 1918–1993: Forskning och institutioner: II: Humanistiska Fakulteten, Teologiska Fakulteten, ed. Solveig Widén. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag, 33–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández, Francisco, Miguel Fuster, and José Calvo (eds) (1994). English historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. (1971). “Towards a theory of deixis”, in The PCCLLU Papers (Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii), 3.4: 219–241.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. (1975). Santa Cruz lectures on deixis, 1971 Mimeo, Indiana University Linguistics Club.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. (1982). “Ideal readers and real readers”, in Analysing discourse: Text and talk, ed. Deborah Tannen. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 248–270.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finell, Ann (1989). “
Well now and then”, Journal of Pragmatics, 13: 653–656. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fish, Stanley (1980). Is there a text in this class?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisiak, Jacek (1974). “Linguistic reality of Middle English”, in English Historical Linguistics, eds Francisco Fernández, Miguel Fuster, and José Calvo. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 47–61.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fludernik, Monika (1975). The fictions of language and the languages of fiction: The linguistic representation of speech and consciousness. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fokkema, D. W. and Elrud Kunne-Ibsch (1977). Theories of literature in the twentieth century: Structuralism, Marxism, aesthetics of reception, semiotics. London: Batsford Academic and Educational.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Forster, E. M. (1974). Aspects of the novel [1927], ed. Oliver Stallybrass. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foucault, M. (1984). “The order of discourse”, in Language and politics, ed. M. Shapiro. Oxford: Blackwell, 108–138.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, Alastair (1982). Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, Roger (1977). Linguistics and the novel. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fowler, Roger (1981). Literature as social discourse: The practice of linguistic criticism. London: Batsford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
French, A. L. (1976). “Mr. Jaggers”, Essays in Criticism 26: 278–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frese, Dolores Warwick (1977). “The homoerotic underside in Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale and Reeve’s Tale ”, Michigan Academician 10: 143–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, Lucy (1994). “Taming to improve: Dickens and the women in Great Expectations ”, in New Casebooks: Great Expectations: Charles Dickens, ed. Roger D. Sell. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 60–78.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frost, Robert (1968). “The figure a poem makes”, in Selected prose of Robert Frost, eds. Hyde Cos and Edward Connery Lathem. New York: Collier Books, 17–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frye, Northrop (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardner, Helen (ed.) (1957). The Metaphysical poets. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardner, Helen (1959). The business of criticism. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardner, Helen (1965). John Donne: The Elegies and The Songs and Sonnets, edited with an introduction and commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gardner, R. C. and W. E. Lambert (1959). “Motivational variables in second language acquisition”, Canadian Journal of Psychology 13: 266–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Geertz, C. (1975). The interpretation of culture. London: Hutchinson.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gellrich, Jesse M. (1974). “The parody of medieval music in the Miller’s Tale ”, JEGP 73: 176–88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Genette, Gerard (1980). Narrative discourse. Oxford: Basil Blackwell ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, Walker (1966). Tough, sweet, and stuffy. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, Lyndall (1977). Eliot’s early years. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graff, Gerald (1992). Beyond the culture wars: How teaching the conflicts can revitalize American education. New York: Norton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gray, Benison (1977). The grammatical foundations of rhetoric: Discourse analysis. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, Michael (1982). “The Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies”, in Peter Widdowson (ed.) Re-reading English. London: Methuen, 77–90.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenbaum, Sidney (1988). Good English and the grammarian. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenblatt, Stephen (ed.) (1988). Representing the English renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greenblatt, Stephen (1980). Renaissance self-fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gregg K. R. (1998). “Second Language acquisition: History and theory”, in Concise Encylopedia of Pragmatics, ed. Jacob L. Mey. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998, 808–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greimas, Algirdas Julien (1966). Semantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. Paul (1975, 1991). “Logic and conversation” [1967], in Syntax and semantics, Volume 3: Speech acts, eds Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press, 41–58, and in Pragmatics: A reader , ed. Steven Davis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991, 305–15.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Habermas, Jürgen (1994). “Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state,” in Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition, ed. Amy Gutman. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 107–148.. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1971). “Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors ”, in Literary style: A symposium , ed. Seymour Chatman. New York: Oxford University Press, 330–365.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan (1975). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Victoria 3217: Deakin University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hampshire, Stuart (1992). Innocence and experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Wilson (1989). “Comedy and modern allegory: A personal view”, in A shaping of connections: Commonwealth literature studies – then and now, eds Hena Maes-Jelinek, Kirsten Holst Petersen and Anna Rutherford. Mundelstrup: Dangaroo Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harrison, Brian (1990). “Culture, Literature and the Language Classroom,” in Culture and the language classroom, ed. Brian Harrison, Modern English Publications and British Council, 45–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, E. W. (1987). Modern languages in the curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975). Aesthetics, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hess, Gunter (1989). “History and language: Towards a social account of language change”, Journal of Pragmatics 13: 445–466. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hickey, Leo (ed.) (1989). The pragmatics of style. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hinkel, E. (1999). Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hirsch, E. D. (1967). Validity in interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hirsch, E. D. (1976). The aims of interpretation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hirsch, E. D. (1982). “The contents of English literature”, Times Literary Supplement, Decemberl0th, 1359–60.
Holland, Norman (1975). Poems in persons: An introduction to the psychoanalysis of literature. New York: Norton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopper, Paul J. (1979). “Aspect and foregrounding in discourse”, in Syntax and Semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and syntax, ed. Talmy Givón. New York: Academic Press, 213–242.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hurst, R. (1991). “Teaching children adult language,” in Ideas and Issues in Primary ELT, eds C. Kennedy and J. Jarvis. Hong Kong: Nelson, 131–138.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irwin, Michael (1989). “English and interdisciplinary studies”, in English economis’d: English and British higher education in the eighties, ed. Martin Dodsworth. London: John Murray, 65–75.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Isaksson-Wikberg, Maria (1999). Negotiated and committed argumentation: A cross-cultural study of American and Finland-Swedish student writing. Åbo: Abo Akademi University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iser, Wolfgang (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobson, Roman (1960). “Linguistics and poetics”, in Style in language, ed. Thomas A. Sebeok. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 350–377.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jambeck, Thomas J. (1975). “Characterization and syntax in the Miller’s Tale ”, Journal of Narrative Technique 5: 73–85.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jauss, Hans Robert (1982). Toward an aesthetic of reception. Brighton: Harvester Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Samuel (1925). Lives of the English poets, volume one, ed. L. Archer Hind. London: Dent.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jolles, André (1956). Einfache Formen: Legende, Sage, Mythe, Rätsel, Spruch, Kasus, Memorabile, Märchen, Witz [1930]. Halle: Niemeyer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordan, John O. (1983). “The medium of Great Expectations ”, Dickens Studies Annual 11: 73–88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jouve, Nicole Ward (1991). White woman speaks with forked tongue: Criticism as autobiography. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, Fred (1975). Dickens and Mesmerism: The hidden springs of fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaske, R. E. (1962). “The Canticum Canticorum in the Miller’s Tale ”, Studies in Philology 59: 479–500.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keats, John (1954). Selected letters of John Keats, ed. Frederick Page. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kerkhof, Jelle (1966). Studies in the language of Geoffrey Chaucer. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kermode, Frank (1975). The classic. London: Faber.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiernan, Kevin S. (1975). “The art of the descending catalogue and a fresh look at Alysoun”, Chaucer Review 10: 1–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Knights, L. C. (1964). “The university teaching of English and history”, in his Explorations. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 191–203.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, S. D. and T. D. Terrell (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, Stephen D. (1981). “The ‘fundamental pedagogical principle’ in second language teaching,” Studia Linguistica 35: 50–70. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krashen, Stephen D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon: Oxford.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kucich, John (1991). “Recent Dickens studies: 1989”, Dickens Studies Annual 20: 313–360.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William and Joshua Waletzky (1967). “Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience”, in Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. June Helm. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George and Mark Turner (1989). More cool than reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, Robin (1973). “Questionable answers and answerable questions”, in Issues in linguistics, eds Braj B. Kachru et al.. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 453–467.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach (1979). “Stylistic strategies within a grammar of style”, in Language, sex, and gender, eds Judith Orasanu et al.. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 53–84.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Michael H. Long (1991). An introduction to second language Acquisition Research. London: Longman, 302–322.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leavis, F. R. (1948). Education and the university: A sketch for an “English School” [1943] London: Chatto & Windus.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leavis, F. R. (1962). The great tradition: George Eliot, Henry James, Joseph Conrad [1948]. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, E., M. Whitburn and F. Winter (1982). “Culture and Semantic Opacity in Foreign Language Learning,” in Cultural aspects of foreign language teaching, ed. J. Nivette. Brussels: ABLA Papers 6 .![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Michael H. Short (1981). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemke, Jay L. (1987). “The topology of genre: Text structures and text types” (MS).
Levi, Peter (1991). The art of poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levi-Strauss (1968). Claude, Structural anthropology. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1970). “Overture to Le cru et le cuit ” [1964], in Structuralism, ed. Jacques Ehrmann. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor, 31–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightbown, P. M. (2000). “Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching”, Applied Linguistics 21: 431–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightbown, P. M. (1985). “Great expectations: Second-language acquisition research and classroom teaching”, Applied Linguistics 6:173–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linde, Charlotte (1979). “Focus of attention and choice of pronouns”, in Syntax and semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. Talmy Givón. New York: Academic Press, 337–354.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linell, Per (1982). The written-language bias of linguistics. Linköping: University of Linköping.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longacre, R. E. (1981). “A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis”, Text, 1: 337–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longacre, R. E. (1979). “The paragraph as a grammatical unit”, in Syntax and semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and syntax, ed. Talmy Givón. New York: Academic Press, 115–134.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Loveday, L. (1982). The sociolinguistics of learning and using a non-native language. Oxford: Pergamon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lucas, John (1992). Charles Dickens: the Major Novels. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John (1979). “Deixis and anaphora” in The development of conversation and discourse, ed. T. Myers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 103.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lyons, John (1977). Semantics, vols 1 and 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacLeish, Archibald (1926). “Ars Poetica”, in Poetry: A Magazine of Verse, ed. Harriet Munro), June, 126–127.
Maes-Jelinek, Hena (1998). “Latent cross-culturalities: Wilson Harris’s and Wole Soyinka’s creative alternative to theory”, European Journal of English Studies 2: 37–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maingueneau, Dominique (1990). Pragmatique pour le discours littéraire. Paris: Bordas.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Major, Gwen (1971). “The Magwitch hide-out”, Dickensian 67: 31–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Major, John (1960). “The personality of Chaucer the pilgrim”, PMLA 75: 160–3. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malinowski, B. (1938). “The problem of meaning in primitive languages” [1923], in The meaning of meaning, eds. C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards. London: Trench, Truber & Co., 296–336.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGann, Jerome J. (1985). The beauty of inflections: Investigations in historical method and theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGann, Jerome J. (1991). “What difference do the circumstances of publication make to the interpretation of a literary work?” in Literary pragmaics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge, 190–207.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McHale, Brian (1978). “Free indirect discourse: A survey of recent accounts” Poetics and Theory of Literature 3: 249–287.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntosh, A. (1963). “
As You Like It: A grammatical clue to character”, A Review of English Literature 4: 66–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLaughlin, B., S. Robbins, and J. A. B. T. Wade (1998). “Second language learning and teaching, Theory of”, in Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. Jacob L. Mey. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 816–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mead, George Herbert (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meckier, Jerome (1987). Hidden rivalries in Victorian fiction: Dickens, realism, and revaluation. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mehl, Dieter (1978). “Chaucer’s audience”, Leeds Studies in English 10: 58–74.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. (1994). Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, Jacob L. (2000). When voices clash: A study in literary pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Midgley, M. (1980). Beast and man: The roots of human nature. London: Methuen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, J. and W. Kintsch (1980). “Readability and recall of short passages: A theoretical analysis”, Journal of Experimental Pyschology: Human Learning and Memory 6: 335–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, J. Hillis (1995). “The university of dissensus,” Oxford Literary Review 17: 121–143. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, Robert P. (1971). “
The Miller’s Tale as a complaint”, Chaucer Review 5: 147–60.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milton, John (1925). Areopagitica: A speech of Mr John Milton for the liberty of unlicensed printing to the Parliament of England [1644], in Milton’s Prose, ed. Malcolm W. Wallace. London: Oxford University Press, 275–324.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monni, Sari (1995). “Introducing drama in the language classroom: Intermediate and advanced levels,” in Literature throughout foreign language education: The implications of pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Modern English Publications in Association with The British Council, 74–86.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, C. (1995). “Cultural awareness and the national curriculum,” Language Learning Journal 2: 9–12. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mukarovsky, Jan (1970). Aesthetic function, norm and value as social facts [1936]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mustanoja, Tauno F. (1960). A Middle English syntax vol. I. Helsinki: Societé Neophilologique.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, Terttu (1999). “Making the best use of ‘bad’ data: Evidence for sociolinguistic variation in Early Modern English”, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100: 499–533.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm (1872). Die Geburt der Tragödie. Leipzig: Fritzsch.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Niitemaa, Marja-Leena and Eija Inberg (1995). “Making literature belong: English in a team-taught programme from the first grade onwards, in Literature throughout foreign language education: The implications of pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Modern English Publications in Association with The British Council, 36–39.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Novelli, Cornelius (1957). “The demonstrative adjective This: Chaucer’s use of a colloquial narrative device”, Mediaeval Studies 20: 246–9. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunberg, Geoffrey (1981). “Validating pragmatic explanations” in Radical pragmatics, ed. Peter Cole. New York: Academic Press, 198–222.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nuyts, Jan and Jef Verschueren (eds) (1987). A comprehensive bibliography of pragmatics, 4 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nykrog, Per (1973). Les fabliaux: étude d’histoire lilleraire et de stylistique medievale [1957]. Geneva: Libraire Droz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ochs, E. (1979). “Planned and unplanned discourse”, in Syntax and Semantics Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. Talmy Givón. New York: Academic Press, 51–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Oleksy, Wieslaw (1989). Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, Walter J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osgood, Charles E. (1930). Lectures on language performance. New York: Springer Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Osgood, Charles E. (1971). “Where do sentences come from?”, in Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, eds Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 497–529.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pagnini, Marcello (1980). Pragmatica della litteratura. Palermo: Sellerio editore.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, D. J. (1965). The rise of English studies. London: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parry, Noel and Jose Parry (1976). The rise of the medical profession: A study of collective social mobility. London: Croom Helm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pearlman, E. (1978). “Inversion in Great Expectations ”, Dickens Studies Annual 7: 190–202, 259–60.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perkins, Michael R. (1983). Modal expressions in English. London: Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petersen, Per Serritslev (ed.) (1992). Literary pedagogics after deconstruction: Scenarios and perspectives in the teaching of English literature. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrey, Sandy (1990). Speech acts and literary theory. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, Virginia (1978). “‘Brought up by hand’: Dickens’s Pip, little Paul Dombey, and Oliver Twist”, Dickensian 74: 144–147.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pica, T. (1983). “Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure,” Language Learning 33: 465–97. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pratt, Marie Louise (1977). Toward a speech-act theory of literary discourse. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen E. (1981). “Toward a taxonomy of given-new information”, in Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 223–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Gerald (1983). “Narrative pragmatics, message, and point”, Poetics, 12: 527–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Puttenham, George (1904). The Arte of English Poesie [1589], in Elizabethan critical essays, Vol. 2, ed. G. Gregory Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–193.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rabinowitz, Peter J. (1977). “Truth in fiction: A re-examination of audiences”, Critical Inquiry 4: 121–142. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raphael, Linda (1989). “A Re-vision of Miss Havisham: Her expectations and our Responses”, Studies in the Novel 21: 400–412.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reichart, John (1980). Making sense of literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riffaterre, Michael (1967). “Criteria for style analysis” [1959], in Essays on the language of literature , eds Seymour Chatman and Samuel R. Levin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1967, 412–430.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riffaterre, Michael (1967). “Stylistic context” [1960], in Essays on the language of literature, eds Seymour Chatman and Samuel R. Levin. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 431–41.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith (1983). Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rönnqvist, Lilian and Roger D. Sell (1995). “Teenage books in foreign language education for the middle dchool”, in Literature throughout foreign language education: The implications of pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Modern English Publications in association with The British Council, 40–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roscow, G. H. (1981). Syntax and style in Chaucer’s poetry. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, Rowman and Littlefield.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenberg, Edgar (1972). “A preface to Great Expectations: The pale usher dusts his lexicons”, Dickens Studies Annual 2: 294–335, 374–78.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenberg, Edgar (1973). “Small talk in Hammersmith: Chapter 23 of Great Expectations ”, Dickensian 69: 90–101.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosenberg, Edgar (1981). “Last words on Great Expectations: A textual brief on the six endings”, Dickens Studies Annual 9: 87–115.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosseel, E. (1982). “Needs, cultural identity and foreign language learning,” in Foreign language teaching and cultural identity, eds R. T. Nasr et al.. São Paulo: Instituto de Idiomas Yázigi-Aimav.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rowland, Beryl (1960). “The play of the Miller’s Tale: A game within a game”, Chaucer Review 5: 140–6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rowland, Beryl (1974). “Chaucer’s blasphemous churl: A new interpretation of the Miller’s Tale ”, in Chaucer and Middle English studies in honor of Russell Hope Robbins, ed. Beryl Rowland. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 43–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruggiers, Paul G. (ed.) (1979). The Canterbury Tales: A facsimile and transcription of the Hengwrt manuscript, with variants from the Ellesmere manuscript. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, David (1975). “Notes on a schema for stories”, in D. Bobrow and A. Collins (eds.), Representations and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 211–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, David (1980). “Schemata: The building blocks of cognition”, in Theoretical issues in reading comprehension, ed. R. J. Spiro. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 33–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadrin, Anny (1988). Great Expectations. London: Unwin Hyman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sadrin, Anny (ed.) (1999). Dickens Europe and the new worlds. London: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Said, Edward W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. London: Random House/Vintage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salmon, Vivian (1975). “The representation of colloquial speech in The Canterbury Tale ”, in Style and text: Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist, ed. Håkan Ringbom. Stockholm: Skriptor, 263–77.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schaar, Claes (1954). Some types of narrative in Chaucer’s poetry. Lund: G. W. K. Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schaar, Claes (1955). The golden mirror: Studies in Chaucer’s descriptive technique. Lund: G. W. K. Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schaar, Claes (1991). “On free and latent semantic energy”, in Literary pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge, 164–178.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schank, R. C. and R. R. Abelson (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiefflin, B. and E. Ochs (1986). “Language socialization.” Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 163–91. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlauch, Margaret (1952). “Chaucer’s colloquial traits”, PMLA 67: 1103–16. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, R. W. (1983). “Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult”, in Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, eds N. Wolfson et al.. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 137–174.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, Siegfried J. (1976). “A pragmatic interpretation of ‘fictionality’”, in Pragmatics of language and literature, ed. Teun A. van Dijk. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 161–178.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, Siegfried J. (1982). Foundations for the empirical study of literature: The components of a basic theory. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmidt, Siegfried J. (1983). “The empirical science of literature ESL: A new paradigm”, Poetics 12: 19–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schourup, Lawrence C. (1983). “Common discourse particles in English conversation”, Working papers in linguistics, 28. Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.
Searle, John R. (1975). “The logical status of fictional discourse”, New Literary History 6: 319–392. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John R., Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Bierwisch (eds) (1980). Speech-act theory and pragmatics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seelye, H. N. (1985). Teaching culture: Strategies for intercultural communication, 2nd ed. Lincolnwood, ILL: National Textbook Company.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1975). “Two types of style contrast in King Lear: A literary-critical appraisal”, in Håkan Ringbom (ed.), Style and text: Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist. Stockholm: Skriptor, 155–171.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1978). Trespassing ghost: A critical study of Andrew Young, Acta Academiae Aboensis, ser. A, 56/1. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1980). Robert Frost: Four studies. Acta Academiae Aboensis ser. A, 57/2. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1983). “Projection characters in David Copperfield ”, Studia Neophilologica 55: 19–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1983). The reluctant naturalism of Amelia: An essay on the Modern reading of Fielding. Acta Academiae Aboensis ser. A, 63/3. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1985). “Politeness in Chaucer: Suggestions towards a methodology for pragmatic stylistics”, Studia Neophilologica 57: 175–185. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1985). “Tellability and politeness in ‘The Miller’s Tale’: First steps in Literary pragmatics”, English Studies 66: 496–512. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1986). “Dickens and the new historicism: The polyvocal audience and discourse of Dombey and Son ”, in The nineteenth-century British novel, ed. Jeremy Hawthorne. London: Arnold, 63–79.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1986). “The drama of fictionalized author and reader: A formalist obstacle to literary pragmatics,” REAL: Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature 4: 291–316.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1987). “The unstable discourse of Henry Vaughan: A literary-pragmatic account”, in Essential articles for the study of Henry Vaughan, ed. Alan Rudrum. Hamden CONN.: Achron Books, 311–332.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1989). “Disciplinary fragmentation and integration: Grammatology and literary pragmatics”, PARLANCE: The Journal of the Poetics and Linguistics Association 2:1 (1989) 5–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1989). “English Departments in British Higher Education: A View from Abroad”, in English economis’d: English and British higher education the eighties, ed. Martin Dodsworth. London: John Murray, 89–100.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1989). “Literary Pragmatics, with notes on curricular and pedagogical implications, and an invitation to cooperation” in Proceedings from the Fourth Nordic Conference for English Studies, Vol. 2, eds. Graham Caie et al.. Copenhagen: Department of English, Copenhagen University, 749–760.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1991). “Gerhardie’s Chekhovian Debut”, Essays in Criticism 31: 28–50. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1991). “How can literary pragmaticists develop empirical methods? The problem of modal and evaluative expressions in literary texts”, in Empirical Studies of Literature, eds Elrud Ibsch et al.. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 138–145.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1991). “Literary genre and history: Questions from a literary ragmaticist for socio-semioticians”, in Approaches to the analysis of literary discourse, ed. Eija Ventola. Åbo: Åbo Academy Press, 1–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1991). “Literary pragmatics: An introduction”, in Literary Pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge, xi–xxiii.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1991). “The joys of interdisciplinarity: Current literary research in Denmark”, Orbis Litterarum 46: 180–191. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1991). “The politeness of literary texts”, in Literary pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge 208–224.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1992). “Literary texts and diachronic aspects of politeness”, in Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice, eds Richard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 109–129. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1992). “Teaching Shakespeare on literary pragmatic principles”, in Literary Pedagogics after deconstruction: Scenarios and perspectives in the teaching of English literature, ed. Per Serritslev Petersen. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 7–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1992). A report on the departmental self-Assessment: Spring 1992 [English Department Publications 1] Åbo: Åbo Akademi University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1992). Review of Helmut Bonheim’s Literary systematics , Modern Language Review 87: 909–910. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1993). “Simulative panhumanism: A challenge to current linguistic and literary Thought”, Modern Language Review 88: 545–558. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1993). “The difficult style of The Waste Land: A literary-pragmatic perspective on Modernist poetry,” in Twentieth-Century Poetry: From Text to Context, ed. Peter Verdonk. London: Routledge, 134–158.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1994). “Literary gossip, literary theory, literary pragmatics” in Literature and the new interdisciplinarity: Poetics, linguistics, history, eds Roger D. Sell and Peter Verdonk. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 221–241.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1994). “Literary pragmatics and speech-act theory of literature,” in Writing and speaking: Language, text, discourse, communication, eds. Svĕtla Čmejrková, František Daneš, and Eva Havlová. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag, 125–135.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1995). “A literary pragmatic view of international critics of American literature: The case of Robert Frost in the late 1970s,” in American Literature for Non-American Readers: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on American Literature, ed. Meta Grosman. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 149–166.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1998). “Literary Pragmatics” [1994], in Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. Jacob L. Mey. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 523–536.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1999). “
Henry V and the strength and weakness of words: Shakespearian philology, historicist criticism, communicative pragmatics”, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 100: 535–63.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (1999). “Modernist readings mediated: Dickens and the new worlds of later generations”, Dickens, Europe and the New Worlds, ed. Anny Sadrin. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 294–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (2000). “Changes in politeness” in his Literature as communication: The foundations of mediating criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 207–30. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (2000). “Teenage novels in the FLE classroom: Cultural understanding within literary and language education”, in Children in literature – children’s literature, ed. Paul Neubauer. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 65–83.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (2001). “Communication: A counterbalance to professional specialization, in Innovation and continuity in English studies, ed. Herbert Grabes. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 74–89.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (2001). “Robert Frost and childhood”, in his Mediating criticism: Literary education humanized. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–261. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (2011). “
Great Expectations and the Dickens Community,” in his Communicational Criticism: Studies in Literature as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 195–221.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (ed.) (1991). Literary Pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge, rep. 2016.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (ed.) (1995). Literature throughout foreign language education: The implications of pragmatics. London: Modern Language Publications in association with The British Council.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. (ed.) (2006). Literature as communication: Guest-edited Special Issue, Nordic Journal of English Studies 7: 1–172.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. and Ilkka Joki (1989). “Robert E. Sherwood and the Finnish Winter War: Drama, propaganda and context 50 Years Ago”, American Studies in Scandinavia 21: 51–69.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. and Anthony W. Johnson (eds) (2009). Religion and writing in England, 1558–1689: Studies in community-making and cultural Memory. Farnham: Ashgate.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D. and Peter Verdonk (eds) (1994). Literature and the new interdisciplinarity: Poetics, Linguistics, History. Amsterdam: Rodopi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sell, Roger D., Anthony W. Johnson, and Helen Wilcox (eds) (2017). Community-making in early Stuart theatres: Stage and audience. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shapiro, Michael (1991). The sense of change: Language as history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shatto, Susan (1985). “Miss Havisham and Mr. Mopes the hermit: Dickens and the mentally ill”, Dickens Quarterly 2: 43–50 and 79–84.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaw, George Bernard (1921). The Doctor’s Dilemma, Getting Married, & The Showing-up of Blanco Posnet. London: Constable.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shklovsky, Victor (1965). “Sterne’s Tristram Shandy: Stylistic commentary” [1921], in Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays, eds T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 25–57.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shusterman, Richard (1992). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking Art. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, Paul (1989). “Politeness phenomena in Ionesco’s The Lesson ”, in Language, discourse and literature: An introductory reader in discourse stylistics, eds Ronald Carter and Paul Simpson. London: Unwin Hyman, 171–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, J. McH. (1966). “Taking a poem to pieces”, in Essays on style and language, ed. Roger Fowler. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 68–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sjöholm, K. (2001). “Incidental learning of English by Swedish learners in Finland,” in Language, learning, literature: Studies presented to Håkan Ringbom [English Department Publications 4], eds M. Gill et al.. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University, 77–89.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slatoff, Walter J. (1970). With respect to readers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures [The 1957 Reid Lecture]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Soyinka, Wole (1988). “Between self and system: The artist in search of liberation”, in his Art, Dialogue and Outrage: Essays on Literature and Culture. Ibadan: New Horn Press, 71.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spacks, Patricia M. (1978). “Us or them”, Hudson Review 31: 34–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan (1975). Rethinking symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spingarn, J. E. (1908). Critical essays of the seventeenth century, 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, Gerard (1991). “Understanding metaphor in literature: Towards an empirical study”, in Literary pragmatics, ed. Roger D. Sell. London: Routledge, 110–126.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stein, Robert A. (1988). “Pip’s poisoning Magwitch, supposedly: The historical context and its implications for Pip’s guilt and shame”, Philological Quarterly 67: 103–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stephens, John and Ruth Waterhouse (1990). Literature, language, and change: From Chaucer to the present. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stiles, William S. (1981). “Classification of intersubjective illocutionary acts”, Language in Society 10: 227–249. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stone, Harry (1979). Dickens and the invisible world: Fairy tales, fantasy and novel-making. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stone, Harry (ed.) (1987). Dickens’s working notes for his novels. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stubbs, Michael (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural Language. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sturrock, John (1979). “Roland Barthes”, in Structuralism and since, ed. John Sturrock. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52–80.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sundholm, M. and L. Finne (1994). Det globala klassrummet. Vasa: Pedagogiska fakulteten vid Åbo Akademi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sutherland, James (1977). The Oxford book of literary anecdotes. London: Futura.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swingewood, Alan (1986). Sociological poetics and aesthetic theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swirski, Peter (1996). “Literary studies and literary pragmatics: The case of ‘The Purloined Letter’”, SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism 25: 69–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tallis, Raymond (1997). Enemies of hope: A critique of contemporary pessimism, irrationalism, anti-humanism and counter-enlightenment. Basingstoke: Macmillan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah (1986). “Introducing constructed dialogue in Greek and American conversational and literary narrative”, in Direct and indirect Speech, ed. Florian Coulmas. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 311–332. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah (ed.) (1982). Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, Charles (1994). “The politics of recognition”, in Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition, ed. Amy Gutman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 25–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taylor, Gary (1986). “The date and authorship of the Folio version”, in The division of the kingdoms: Shakespeare’s two versions of King Lear, eds Gary Taylor and Michael Irwin. Oxford: Clarendon Press: Oxford, 351–482.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Terrell, T. (1977). “A natural approach to second language acquisition and learning,” Modern Language Journal 6: 27–32.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Threadgold, Terry (1989). “Talking about genre: Ideologies and incompatible discourses”, Cultural Studies 3: 101–127. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thurin, Susan Schoenbauer (1983). “To be brought up ‘by hand’”, Victorian Newsletter 64: 27–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomalin, Claire (1991). The invisible woman: The story of Nelly Ternan and Charles Dickens. Harmondsworth: Penguin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsur, R. (1992). Towards a theory of cognitive poetics. Amsterdam: North Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turner, Victor (1977). The ritual process. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Cees, C. J. (1983). Advances in the empirical sociology of literature and the arts”, Poetics 12: 285–310. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dijk, Teun (ed.) (1976). Pragmatics of language and literature. Amsterdam: North-Holland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Peer, Willie and J. Renkema (eds) (1984). Pragmatics and stylistics. Leuven: Acco.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Tieghem, Paul (1983). “La question des genres littéraires”, Helicon 1: 95–101.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ventola, Eija (1987). The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Frances Pinter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verschueren, Jef (1987). Pragmatics as a theory of linguistic adaptation, IRPA [International Pragmatics Association] Working Document 1.
Visser, F. Th. (1963–1973). An historical syntax of the English language I–III. Leiden: E.J. Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wall, Barbara (1991). The narrator’s voice: The dilemma of children’s literature. Basingstoke: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wall, Stephen (1982). “Annotated English novels?” Essays in Criticism 32: 1–8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watkins, Gwen (1987). Dickens in search of himself: Recurrent themes and characters in the work of Charles Dickens. London: Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard J. (1981). The pragmalinguistic analysis of narrative texts: Narrative cooperation in Charles Dickens’s “Hard Times”. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich (eds) (1992). Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weimann, Robert (1976). Structure and society in literary history: Studies in the history and theory of historical criticism. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1976.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weinsheimer, Joel (1992). Philosophical hermeneutics and literary theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, Hayden (1978). “The fictions of factual representation”, in his Tropics of discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 121–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Willner, Evan (2002). “The arbiter-critic” [= review of Roger D. Sell, Literature as communication: The foundations of mediating criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000],
Essays in Criticism 52: 62–86.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wimsatt, W. K. (1954). “The intentional fallacy” [1946], in his The verbal icon. London: Methuen, 2–18.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witt, Richard (1989). “The death of Miss Havisham”, Dickensian 80: 151–156.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Woodmansee, Martha (1978). “Speech-act theory and the perpetuation of the dogma of literary autonomy”, Centrum 6: 75–89.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wordsworth, William (1950). “Preface to the second edition of several of the foregoing poems published, with an additional volume, under the title of Lyrical Ballads ” [1801], in The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth, eds Thomas Hutchinson and Ernest de Selincourt. London: Oxford University Press, 734–743.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wordsworth, William (1952). The Poetical Works of William Wordsworth, 2nd ed., ed. E. de Selincourt. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wordsworth, William (1965). “Preface to Lyrical Ballads ” [1802], in Lyrical Ballads: Wordsworth and Coleridge: The text of the 1798 edition with the additional 1800 poems and the Prefaces, eds R. L. Brett and A. R. Jones. London: Methuen, 234–266.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Worth, George J. (1986). Great Expectations: An annotated bibliography. New York: Taylor and Francis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Young, Edward (1918). Conjectures on original composition [1759], ed. Edith J. Morely. Manchester: Manchester University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zilliacus, Clas (trans.) (1983). Den tragiska berättelsen om Hamlet, prins av Danmark. Helsingfors: Schildts.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)