Cover not available
Obituary published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp.205–228
Obituary

A tribute to M. A. K. Halliday (1925–2018)

| KU Leuven
Article outline
  • 1.Cracking linguistic codes: Theoretical-descriptive work
    • 1.1.1Study of Chinese
    • 1.1.2Scale and Category Grammar
      • 1.2.1Description of English
      • 1.2.2Systemic Functional Grammar
    • 1.3.1Description of one child’s protolanguage
    • 1.4Language as a social semiotic
  • 2.Halliday’s significance and enduring influence
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00008.dav
References (84)
References
Bernstein, Basil (ed.). 1971. Class, codes and control. Vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards the sociology of language . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret. 1982. Review of Halliday, M. A. K., Language as Social Semiotic. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 11(2). 64–94.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech & Randolph Quirk. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bowerman, Melissa. 1973. Learning to talk: A cross-linguistic study of early syntactic development, with special reference to Finnish . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger. 1973. A first language: The early stages . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Ronald & Peter Stockwell (eds.). 2008. The language and literature reader . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, Margret Selting & Paul Drew. 1996. Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin. 1998. Agnates, verb classes and the meaning of construals: The case of ditransitivity in English. Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 87(3–4). 218–313.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, Robert & Wolfgang Dressler. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics . London: Taylor Francis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1963. A logical statement of grammatical theory: As contained in Halliday’s ‘Categories of the Theory of Grammar’. Language 39(4). 654–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984. Searching for Aboriginal languages. Memoirs of a field worker . St Lucia/London/New York: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke. 1992. A university course in English grammar . New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Engels, L. K. 1990. Language topics. Essays in honour of M. Halliday. Revue belge de philologie et d’histoire 68(3). 709–724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research . London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Robin. 2001. A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics . Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin & Gordon Tucker. 1990. Demonstration of GENESYS: a very large, semantically based systemic functional grammar. 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics . Vol. 11. Helsinki: Finland, 47–49.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. 1968. The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory , 1–88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1935. The technique of semantics. Transactions of the Philological Society 341. 36–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1948. Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society 471. 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1957. Papers in linguistics . London: OUP.Google Scholar
Gleason, H. A. 1966. Linguistics and English grammar . New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1956. Grammatical categories in modern Chinese. Transactions of the Philological Society 551. 177–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1959. The language of the Chinese ‘Secret History of the Mongols’ . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1963a. The tones of English. Archivum Linguisticum . 15(1). 1–28.Google Scholar
1963b. Intonation in English grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 621. 143–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1964. English system networks. In Gunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers (1976), 101–135. London: OUP.Google Scholar
1966. Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967a. Intonation and Grammar in British English . The Hague & Paris: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967b. Notes on transitivity and theme in English 1. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967c. Notes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2). 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968. Notes on transitivity and theme in English 3. Journal of Linguistics 4(2). 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1969. Types of process. In Gunther Kress (ed.), Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers (1976), 159–173. London: OUP.Google Scholar
1970. A course in spoken English: Intonation . London: OUP.Google Scholar
1971. Linguistic function and literary style: An inquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors . In Seymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: a symposium , 330–365. London: OUP.Google Scholar
1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3). 322–361.Google Scholar
1973. Explorations in the functions of language . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1974. The place of ‘functional sentence perspective’ in the system of linguistic description. In František Daneš (ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective , 43–53. Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
1975. Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language . London: Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation of language and meaning . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1979. Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure, and their determination by different semantic functions. In D. J. Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds.), Function and context in linguistic analysis: A Festschrift for William Haas , 57–79. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1981. Text semantics and clause grammar: Some patterns of realization. In Jim Copeland & Philip Davis (eds.), Seventh LACUS forum , 31–59. Columbia: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar , 1st edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1988. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In James Benson, Michael Cummings & William Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective , 27–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. An introduction to Functional Grammar , 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2007a. Language and society. Collected works . Vol. 91. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007b. Language and education. Collected works . Vol. 101. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2014. Notes on teaching Chinese to foreign learners. Journal of World Languages 1(1): 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Meaning as choice. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice , 15–36. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & William Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the grammar of English . London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin (eds.). 1981. Readings in Systemic Linguistics . London: Batsford.Google Scholar
. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power . London & Washington DC: Falmer.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar , 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar , 4th edn. London: Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis. 1961. Prolegomena to a theory of language (revised English edition of original Danish version, 1943). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1966. Systemic features and their realization. University College London: mimeo. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), 1981. Readings in Systemic Linguistics , 58–73. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1974. Systemic Generative Grammar. Linguistics 1391. 5–42.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther (ed.) 1976. Halliday: System and function in language. Selected papers . London: OUP.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images. The grammar of visual design . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short. 1981. Style in fiction . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation . Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English text. Systems and structures . Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2013. Interviews with M. A. K. Halliday: Language turned back on himself . London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems . Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.Google Scholar
McGregor, William. 1997. Semiotic Grammar . Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick. N.d. Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday. A biography . Unpublished manuscript.
O’Donnell, Mick & John Bateman. 2005. SFL in computational contexts: A contemporary history. In Jonathan Webster & Ruqaiya Hasan (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective , 343–382. Equinox: London.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2013. Key concepts in phonetics and phonology . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2014. The use of key in projecting face threatening acts in televised political debate. Text & Talk 34(6). 685–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. 1961. Review of The Language of the Chinese ‘Secret History of the Mongols’ by M. A. K. Halliday. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 24(2). 376–378.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1997. Languages and linguists: Aims, perspectives, and duties of linguistics. Interviews with André-Georges Haudricourt, Henry M. Hoenigswald, Robert H. Robins . Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Tench, Paul. 1996. The intonation systems of English . London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the Berkeley linguistics society , 406–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization , 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Turner, Geoffrey. 1973. Social class and children’s language of control at age five and age seven. In Basil Bernstein (ed.), Class, codes and control . Vol. 21: Applied studies towards a sociology of language, 135–201. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Webster, Jonathan. 2015. The Bloomsbury companion to M. A. K. Halliday . London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Winograd, Terry. 1972. Understanding natural language . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Swiggers, Pierre
2024. Review of Aarssen, Genis & van der Veken (2018–2020). Historiographia Linguistica DOI logo
Chrispin, Lucy & Lise Fontaine
2023. Chapter 8. A cognitive-functional approach to watch as a verb of perception. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Gentens, Caroline, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor & An Van linden
2023. Introduction. Reconnecting form and meaning. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hal, Toon Van
2019. Traditions, innovations, and connections in writing the history of linguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 46:3 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Pakir, Anne
2019. Professor Michael Alexander Kirkwood (M.A.K.) Halliday, 1925–2018, founding father of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Asian Englishes 21:3 ► pp. 324 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.