Article published In:
On mood and speech function and the ‘why’ of text analysis: In honour of Margaret Berry
Edited by Lise Fontaine, Miriam Taverniers and Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 26:1] 2019
► pp. 4348
References
Berry, Margaret
1981Polarity, ellipticity, elicitation and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 101.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Randi Reppen
2015The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Eirian
2006Speaking, telling and assertion: Interrogatives and mood in English. Functions of Language 13(2). 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela
2015[1992]English grammar: A university course, 3rd edn. Abingdon, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1971Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s The Inheritors . In Seymour Chapman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 330–369. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen) 2014Halliday’s introduction to Functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Michael
2005Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2008Starting with small words: Patterns, meaningful units, and specialized discourses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(3). 271–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH
2004Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar