Article published in:
On mood and speech function and the ‘why’ of text analysis: In honour of Margaret Berry
Edited by Lise Fontaine, Miriam Taverniers and Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 26:1] 2019
► pp. 5663
References

References

Adolphs, Svenja
2006Introducing electronic text analysis: A practical guide for language and literary studies. London: Routledge. Crossref link
Barlow, Michael
2013Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4). 443–478. Crossref link
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer
(eds.) 2000Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea
2015Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref link
Berry, Margaret
1982Review of M.A.K. Halliday (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 11(1). 64–94.
1989They’re all out of step except our Johnny: A discussion of motivation (or the lack of it) in systemic linguistics. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 3. 5–67.
1996What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. In Margaret Berry, Christopher Butler, Robin Fawcett & Guowen Huang (eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations, 1–64. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dąbrowska, Ewa
2012Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3). 219–253. Crossref link
2016Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 479–491. Crossref link
De Smet, Hendrik
2016How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28(1). 83–102. Crossref link
Fischer, Olga
2007Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: OUP.
2008On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language 32(2). 336–382. Crossref link
2009Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? View[z]: Vienna English Working Papers 18(2). 3–23.
Fried, Mirjam
2008Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
[ p. 63 ]
Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow
2000Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), vii–xxviii.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2001Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188. Crossref link
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. Crossref link
2016For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30. 39–53. Crossref link
2017The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua 199. 72–93. Crossref link
Petré, Peter
2016Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation: Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30. 115–146. Crossref link
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2015A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 3. 1–27. Crossref link
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik
2015Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623. Crossref link
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
von Mengden, Ferdinand & Evie Coussé
2014Introduction: The role of change in usage-based conceptions of language. In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change, 1–19. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Winters, Margaret E. & Geoffrey S. Nathan
1992First he called her a philologist and then she insulted him. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar: A festschrift in honor of James D. McCawley, 351–367. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Noël, Dirk
2019. The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1  pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.