Article published In:
On mood and speech function and the ‘why’ of text analysis: In honour of Margaret BerryEdited by Lise Fontaine, Miriam Taverniers and Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 26:1] 2019
► pp. 56–63
Edited by Lise Fontaine, Miriam Taverniers and Kristin Davidse
[Functions of Language 26:1] 2019
► pp. 56–63
The author and the text in radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, or why historical linguists have started analysing text again
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Usage-based linguistics and diachronic construction grammar
- 3.Internal vs. external systems
- 4.Entrenchment, constructional innovation, corpora and texts
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (27)
Adolphs, Svenja. 2006. Introducing electronic text analysis: A practical guide for language and literary studies. London: Routledge. 
Barlow, Michael. 2013. Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4). 443–478.
Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Spike Gildea. 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar: Epistemological context, basic assumptions and historical implications. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic Construction Grammar, 1–49. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Berry, Margaret. 1982. Review of M.A.K. Halliday (1978) Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning
. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 11(1). 64–94.
. 1989. They’re all out of step except our Johnny: A discussion of motivation (or the lack of it) in systemic linguistics. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 31. 5–67.
. 1996. What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. In Margaret Berry, Christopher Butler, Robin Fawcett & Guowen Huang (eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations, 1–64. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2012. Different speakers, different grammars: Individual differences in native language attainment. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 2(3). 219–253.
. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics 27(4). 479–491.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28(1). 83–102.
Fischer, Olga. 2007. Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: OUP.
. 2008. On analogy as the motivation for grammaticalization. Studies in Language 32(2). 336–382.
. 2009. Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? View[z]: Vienna English Working Papers 18(2). 3–23.
Fried, Mirjam. 2008. Constructions and constructs: Mapping a shift between predication and attribution. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 47–79. Berlin: Mouton.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: CUP.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Michael Barlow. 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), vii–xxviii.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188.
Noël, Dirk. 2007. Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202.
. 2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 301. 39–53.
. 2017. The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua 1991. 72–93.
Petré, Peter. 2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation: Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 301. 115–146.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 1–27.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik. 2015. Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP.
von Mengden, Ferdinand & Evie Coussé. 2014. Introduction: The role of change in usage-based conceptions of language. In Evie Coussé & Ferdinand von Mengden (eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change, 1–19. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Winters, Margaret E. & Geoffrey S. Nathan. 1992. First he called her a philologist and then she insulted him. In Diane Brentari, Gary N. Larson & Lynn A. MacLeod (eds.), The joy of grammar: A festschrift in honor of James D. McCawley, 351–367. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Wiesinger, Evelyn
2023. Chapter 12. On the role of verb-particle constructions in Old Spanish. In Constructions in Spanish [Constructional Approaches to Language, 34], ► pp. 309 ff. 
Taverniers, Miriam
Noël, Dirk
2019. The decline of the Deontic nci construction in Late Modern English. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 6:1 ► pp. 22 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2023. Chapter 5. Towards a radically usage-based account of constructional attrition. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 123 ff.
Noël, Dirk
2024. Culture in a radically usage-based model of language change, with special reference to constructional attrition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 100 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.