Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp.113142
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think: An English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berend, Nina
2005Regionale Gebrauchsstandards – Gibt es sie und wie kann man sie beschreiben? In Ludwig M. Eichinger & Werner Kallmeyer (eds.), Standardvariation. Wie viel Variation verträgt die deutsche Sprache?, 143–170. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Betz, Emma & Andrea Golato
2008Remembering relevant information and withholding relevant next actions: The German token ‘ach ja’. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 55–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1989Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 91. 93–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogaert, Julie van
2010A constructional taxonomy of “I think” and related expressions: Accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14(3). 399–427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 491. 295–332.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic developments. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
2016Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2007Assessing and accounting. In Elizabeth Holt & Rebecca Clift (eds.), Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction, 81–119. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten
2011A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT2. Translated and adapted for English by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Dagmar Barth-Weingarten. Gesprächsforschung 121. 1–51. [URL] (21 Dec. 2016.)
Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed
2005What is modal about I thought that…? English Language and Linguistics 9(2). 311–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, Nadine Proske & Arne Zeschel
(eds.) 2017Verben im interaktiven Kontext. Bewegungsverben und mentale Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Silke Reineke
2017Epistemische Praktiken und ihre feinen Unterschiede: Verwendungen von ich dachte in gesprochener Sprache. In Arnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske & Arne Zeschel (eds.), 337–375.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf, Feilke Helmuth & Angelika Linke
2016Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken: Eine Annäherung aus linguistischer Sicht. In Arnulf Deppermann, Helmuth Feilke & Angelika Linke (eds.), Sprachliche und kommunikative Praktiken, 1–23. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Thomas Schmidt
2014Gesprächsdatenbanken als methodisches Instrument der Interaktionalen Linguistik – Eine exemplarische Untersuchung auf Basis des Korpus FOLK in der Datenbank für Gesprochenes Deutsch (DGD2). In Mitteilungen des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes 1/2014 4–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
1987Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 251. 219–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nicholas J.
2006Social consequences of common ground. In Nicholas Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction, 399–430. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
2008Common ground as a resource for social affiliation. In István Kecskés & Jacob Mey (eds.), Intention, common ground and the egocentric speaker-hearer, 223–254. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed.) 2007Stancetaking in discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt
1987Pragmatic expressions in English: A study of you know, you see and I mean in face-to-face conversation. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
2001Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk. Journal of Pragmatics 33(10). 1337–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2008‘And I think that is a very straight forward way of dealing with it’: The communicative function of cognitive verbs in political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27(4). 384–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita & Marjut Johansson
2010Cognitive verbs in context: A contrastive analysis of English and French argumentative discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(2). 240–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E. & Josef C. Schrock
2002Basic meanings of you know and I mean . Journal of Pragmatics 34(6). 727–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Golato, Andrea
2010Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso. and ach in German interaction. Discourse Studies 12(2). 147–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Golato, Andrea & Emma Betz
2008German ach and achso in repair uptake: Resources to sustain or remove epistemic asymmetry. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 271. 7–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1981Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1996The prosodic contextualization of moral work: An analysis of reproaches in ‘why’-formats. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 271–302. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne & Paul Hopper
2010Zeitlichkeit & sprachliche Strukturen: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und Deutschen. Gesprächsforschung 111. 1–28.Google Scholar
Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke & Arnulf Deppermann
2016A range of uses of negative epistemic constructions in German: ich weiß nicht as a resource for dispreferred actions. Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In John Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 299–345. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2006Cognition in Discourse. In Hedwig te Molder & Jonathan Potter (eds.), Conversation and cognition, 184–202. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2010Conversation Analysis: Practices and methods. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 3rd edn., 208–230. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2012aEpistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012bThe epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013aEpistemics in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 370–394. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
2013bAction formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds. Discourse Studies 15(5). 551–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John & Geoffrey Raymond
2005The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Imo, Wolfgang
2005A Construction Grammar approach to the phrase “I mean” in spoken English. InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structure) 421. 1–37.Google Scholar
2007Construction Grammar und Gesprochene-Sprache-Forschung. Konstruktionen mit zehn matrixsatzfähigen Verben im Gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Konstruktion oder Funktion? Erkenntnisprozessmarker (change-of-state-token) im Deutschen. In Susanne Günthner & Jörg Bücker (eds.), Grammatik im Gespräch, 57–86. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Das Adverb jetzt zwischen Zeit- und Gesprächsdeixis. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 38(1). 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004‘At first I thought’: A normalizing device for extraordinary events. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 131–167. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk 26(6). 699–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 I thought it was pretty neat: Social action formats for taking a stance. In Stef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Mieke Van Herreweghe (eds.), From ‘Will’ to ‘Well’: Studies in Linguistics, 293–304. Gent: Academia.Google Scholar
2012 I thought it was very interesting: Conversational formats for taking a stance. Journal of Pragmatics 44(15). 2194–2210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2011The terms of not knowing. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jakob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 184–206. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky
1967Narrative analysis. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual Arts, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2016Disclaiming epistemic access with ‘know’ and ‘remember’ in Finnish. Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 80–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Jan & Susanna Karlsson
2016Tensions in the epistemic domain and claims of no-knowledge: A study of Swedish medical interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 129–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola
1981You know: A discourse functional approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011Clause-combining and the sequencing of actions: Projector constructions in French talk-in-interaction. In Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds.), Subordination in conversation, 103–148. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 148–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1980Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry 501. 186–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1986Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9(2–3). 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1997Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 144–160. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, Uta
1980Erzählen in Gesprächen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992Lectures on conversation. 21 Vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1996aTurn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emmanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheibmann, Joanne
2000 I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don’t in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1). 105–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, et al.
2009Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT2). Gesprächsforschung 101. 353–402. [URL] (21 Dec. 2016.)
Smith, Michael Sean
2013“I thought” initiated turns: Addressing discrepancies in first-hand and second-hand knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics 571. 318–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
2002“Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26(1). 125–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac
1991The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15(3). 237–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Ann
2011 I don’t know as a prepositioned epistemic hedge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(4). 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, Harald
1993Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin
1991‘I was just doing X ... when Y’: Some inferential properties of a device in accounts for paranormal experiences. Text 11(2). 267–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeschel, Arne
2017 Denken und wissen im gesprochenen Deutsch. In Arnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske & Arne Zeschel (eds.), 249–335.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Laury, Ritva, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Janica Rauma
2020. Chapter 6. When an expression becomes fixed. In Fixed Expressions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 315],  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Pino, Marco & Laura Jenkins
2024. Inviting the Patient to Talk About a Conversation They Had with Another Healthcare Practitioner: A Way of Promoting Discussion About Disease Progression and End of Life in Palliative Care Interactions. Health Communication 39:4  pp. 778 ff. DOI logo
Schirm, Sam
Smith, Michael Sean & Lucas M. Seuren
2022. Re-apprehending misapprehensions: A practice for disclosing troubles in understanding in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 193  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.