Article published In:
Grounding and headedness in the noun phraseEdited by Jean-Christophe Verstraete
[Functions of Language 11:1] 2004
► pp. 7–42
Edited by Jean-Christophe Verstraete
[Functions of Language 11:1] 2004
► pp. 7–42
Are determiners heads?
The paper focuses on the relation between the determiner (D) and the common noun (N) in a noun phrase (NP). Four facts show that D depends on N: only N is relevant to whether NP can be used as an adjunct; possessive determiners are similar to clearly dependent possessives e.g. in Dutch and German; N decides whether or not D is obligatory; and in English only one D is possible per N. Three other facts show the converse, that N depends on D: in many languages D sometimes fuses with a preceding preposition (e.g. French de le = du; English for each = per); D decides whether or not N is obligatory; the ellipsis of N is a regular example of dependent ellipsis. Therefore D and N are mutually dependent, a relation which requires the structural flexibility offered by Word Grammar. This does not mean that NP has two heads, but rather that either D or N may be the head.
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
Duran Eppler, Eva, Adrian Luescher & Margaret Deuchar
2017. Evaluating the predictions of three syntactic frameworks for mixed determiner–noun constructions
. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13:1 ► pp. 27 ff. 
Escribano, José Luis González
2006. NPs as just NPs. Language Sciences 28:6 ► pp. 529 ff.
HUDSON, RICHARD
2018. Pied-piping in cognition. Journal of Linguistics 54:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Ihemere, Kelechukwu
2016. In support of the Matrix Language Frame Model: Evidence from Igbo-English intrasentential code-switching. Language Matters 47:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Liu, Haitao
2010. Dependency direction as a means of word-order typology: A method based on dependency treebanks. Lingua 120:6 ► pp. 1567 ff.
MARTÍNEZ-INSUA, ANA ELINA & JAVIER PÉREZ-GUERRA
2011. An open-sesame approach to English noun phrases: defining the NP (with an introduction to the special issue). English Language and Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
McIntyre, Andrew
2014. Constraining argument structure in nominalizations: The case of English -er. Lingua 141 ► pp. 121 ff.
Osborne, Timothy
2021. NPs, not DPs: The NP vs. DP debate in the context of dependency grammar. Acta Linguistica Academica
Reynolds, Brett
2021. Quantifying the Differences Between Lexical Categories. Cadernos de Linguística 2:3 ► pp. e399 ff.
Smith, Mark
2010. Pragmatic functions and lexical categories. Linguistics 48:3
Van de Velde, Freek
2010. The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48:2
Van de Velde, Freek
2012. PP extraction and extraposition in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34:4 ► pp. 433 ff.
Wang, Lin
2019. Distance and word order between lexical heads and noun dependents in Chinese–English code-switching. Lingua 223 ► pp. 67 ff.
Wang, Lin & Haitao Liu
2016. Syntactic differences of adverbials and attributives in Chinese-English code-switching. Language Sciences 55 ► pp. 16 ff.
Zeman, Daniel, Ondřej Dušek, David Mareček, Martin Popel, Loganathan Ramasamy, Jan Štěpánek, Zdeněk Žabokrtský & Jan Hajič
2014. HamleDT: Harmonized multi-language dependency treebank. Language Resources and Evaluation 48:4 ► pp. 601 ff.
[no author supplied]
2018. Bibliography. In Application of Graph Rewriting to Natural Language Processing, ► pp. 241 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.