Article published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 12:1 (2005) ► pp.39–63
Evaluative that constructions
Signalling stance in research abstracts
The study of interpersonal features of academic texts, through which writers evaluate their material and engage their readers, has been one of the most productive areas of discourse studies of the past decade. Scholarly writing involves adopting a position and persuading readers of claims, and the linguistic resources used to achieve these goals have been described in terms of evaluation, stance and metadiscourse. A relatively overlooked interpersonal feature however is what we shall call evaluative that constructions, a structure which allows a writer to thematize attitudinal meanings and present an explicit statement of evaluation by presenting a complement clause within a super-ordinate clause. In this paper we explore the disciplinary variations in the frequencies, forms and functions of evaluative that structures in 240 research article abstracts from six disciplines. We find that this structure is widely employed in these abstracts, about once every five sentences, and is an important means of providing author comment and evaluation. Evaluative that therefore helps writers to manage their discourse in various ways and to signal a clear stance towards the information they present.
Cited by
Cited by 61 other publications
Abbasi Montazeri, Ebtesam, Alireza Jalilifar & Jorge Arus Hita
2023. Evaluative language in applied linguistics research article discussions: exploring the functions and patterns of that-structures in argumentative texts. Language Awareness 32:2 ► pp. 193 ff. 
Alghazo, Sharif, Mohd Nour Al Salem, Imran Alrashdan & Ghaleb Rabab'ah
2021. Grammatical devices of stance in written academic English. Heliyon 7:11 ► pp. e08463 ff.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
2023. Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2022. Pp. vii + 322. ISBN 9789027211101.. English Language and Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
2021. Chapter 12. Evaluative that structures in the Corpus of English Life Sciences Texts. In “All families and genera”, ► pp. 228 ff.
ALTUN, Hatice
2021. The Comparison of Evaluative That Clauses in Turkish L2 Novice and Expert Writers' Abstracts. Dil Araştırmaları 15:29 ► pp. 99 ff.
Alyousef, Hesham Suleiman
2015. An Investigation of Metadiscourse Features in International Postgraduate Business Students’ Texts. SAGE Open 5:4 ► pp. 215824401561079 ff.
Baklouti, Akila Sellami
2011. The impact of genre and disciplinary differences on structural choice: taxis in research article abstracts. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 31:5 ► pp. 503 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Shelley Staples
2014. Exploring the prosody of stance. In Spoken Corpora and Linguistic Studies [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 61], ► pp. 271 ff.
Cañada Pujols, Maria Dolors & Carme Bach
2022. Marcadores metadiscursivos interaccionales en resúmenes de TFG: ¿indicadores de dominio del género?. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 5 ff.
Chan, Thomas Hon-Tung
2015. A corpus-based study of the expression of stance in dissertation acknowledgements. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20 ► pp. 176 ff.
Chen, Rong
2020. Single author self-reference: Identity construction and pragmatic competence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 45 ► pp. 100856 ff.
Cárcamo Morales, Benjamín
2019. La escritura del resumen en biología: Una revisión bibliográfica. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica ► pp. 57 ff.
Deng, Liming, Meiling Wang & Xiaoping Gao
2023. Predicting the variation in stance-taking: the use of evaluative-that in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Scientometrics 128:6 ► pp. 3283 ff.
Domínguez-Morales, Elena
2023. Book review: Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2022). Stance devices in tourism-related research articles: A corpus-based study. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 18 ► pp. 167 ff.
Dong, Jihua & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2019. Construing Evaluation Through Patterns: Register-specific Variations of the IntroductoryitPattern. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 32 ff.
Dueñas, Pilar Mur
2010. Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross‐cultural corpus‐driven approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 50 ff.
Flowerdew, John
2012. English for Research Publication Purposes. In The Handbook of English for Specific Purposes, ► pp. 301 ff.
Hiltunen, Turo
2022. Chapter 6. Towards a local grammar of stance expression in Late Modern English medical writing. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330], ► pp. 127 ff.
Hu, Guangwei & Feng Cao
2011. Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of Pragmatics 43:11 ► pp. 2795 ff.
Huang, Ping & Shuai Xu
2020. Interpersonal Interaction of Metadiscursive Nouns in Academic Discourse: Comparative Study on Native English and Chinese Writers. In Asian Research on English for Specific Purposes, ► pp. 85 ff.
Hunston, Susan & Hang Su
2019. Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A Case Study of ‘Evaluation’. Applied Linguistics 40:4 ► pp. 567 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2010. Community and Individuality: Performing Identity in Applied Linguistics. Written Communication 27:2 ► pp. 159 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2012. Genre and Discourse Analysis in Language for Specific Purposes. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Hyland, Ken
2015. Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 19 ► pp. 32 ff.
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2018. ‘We Believe That … ’: Changes in an Academic Stance Marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Ibáñez O., Romualdo & Fernando Moncada N.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin)
2017. Stance and voice in academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2015. ‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing. Discourse Studies 17:5 ► pp. 529 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2020. “There are significant differences…”: The secret life of existential there in academic writing. Lingua 233 ► pp. 102758 ff.
Jiang, Feng (Kevin) & Ken Hyland
2021. ‘The goal of this analysis …’: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua 252 ► pp. 103017 ff.
Khany, Reza, Mohammad Aliakbari & Saeedeh Mohammadi
2019. A model of rhetorical markers competence in writing academic research articles: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4:1
Kim, Chanhee & Peter Crosthwaite
2019. Disciplinary differences in the use of evaluative that: Expression of stance via that-clauses in business and medicine. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 41 ► pp. 100775 ff.
Kwon, Monica Heejung, Shelley Staples & R. Scott Partridge
2018. Source work in the first-year L2 writing classroom: Undergraduate L2 writers' use of reporting verbs. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 34 ► pp. 86 ff.
Liardét, Cassi L.
2018. ‘As we all know’: Examining Chinese EFL learners' use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 50 ► pp. 64 ff.
Lin, Meizhen
2021. On Academic Discourse and Global Publishing: Disciplinary Persuasion in Changing Times
. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 44:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Lou, Baocui
2014. A Corpus-Based Study of Evaluative That-Clause in Abstracts of Chinese Learners' Doctoral Dissertations. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 4:3 ► pp. 68 ff.
Man, Deliang & Meng Huat Chau
2019. Learning to evaluate through that-clauses: Evidence from a longitudinal learner corpus. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37 ► pp. 22 ff.
Muresan, Laura Mihaela
2016. Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23 ► pp. 114 ff.
Myung-Hye Huh & 황인영
2011. Actual Use of that-clauses in EFL Writing. The New Korean Journal of English Lnaguage & Literature 53:1 ► pp. 267 ff.
Palmer, Gary B.
2014. Emotional, evaluative, and ideological subjectification in Tagalog and Shona. International Journal of Language and Culture 1:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Parkinson, Jean
2013. Adopting academic values: Student use of that-complement clauses in academic writing. System 41:2 ► pp. 428 ff.
Parkinson, Jean
2020. Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing. Register Studies 2:1 ► pp. 102 ff.
Pearson, William S. & Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh
2023. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A systematic review. Lingua 293 ► pp. 103561 ff.
Phongjit, Wichanon & Chanika Gampper
2023. That- Stance Found in Discussion Sections in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. SSRN Electronic Journal
Phuong Dzung Pho
2008. Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies 10:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Romero-Barranco, Jesús & Paula Rodríguez-Abruñeiras
2021. Current trends in Corpus Linguistics and textual variation. Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:2 ► pp. i ff.
Ruan, Zhoulin
2018. Structural compression in academic writing: An English-Chinese comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36 ► pp. 37 ff.
Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Douglas Biber & Susan Conrad
2015.
Register Variation
A Corpus Approach
. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ► pp. 505 ff.
Suhyun Kim & AhnByungkyoo
2015. A Corpus Study of Evaluative 'that' in Abstracts. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Wang, Shih-ping, Wen-Ta Tseng & Robert Johanson
2021. ToWeor Not toWe: Corpus-Based Research on First-Person Pronoun Use in Abstracts and Conclusions. SAGE Open 11:2 ► pp. 215824402110088 ff.
Wu, Juanjuan & Fan Pan
2023. Stance construction via that-clauses in telecommunications research articles: a comparison of L1 and L2 expert writers. Text & Talk 0:0
Wu, Shaoqun, Alannah Fitzgerald, Ian H. Witten & Alex Yu
2018. Automatically Augmenting Academic Text for Language Learning. In Handbook of Research on Integrating Technology Into Contemporary Language Learning and Teaching [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 512 ff.
Wu, Shaoqun, Liang Li, Ian Witten & Alex Yu
2018. A Systematic Review of Using Discipline-Specific Corpora for Lexico-Grammatical Pattern Learning. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching 8:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Xiao, Gengsheng & Huimin Jiang
2022. A Comparative Study of Stance Adverbs Used in the Introduction Section of Chinese and English Native Scholars’ Journal Articles. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences 2:7 ► pp. 10 ff.
Yoon, Choongil
2019. Stance in the Introductory it Construction: A Comparative Study of Argumentative Writing by Korean EFL and English L1 Students. Lanaguage Research 55:3 ► pp. 601 ff.
Zhang, Guiping
2015. It is suggested that…or it is better to…? Forms and meanings of subject it-extraposition in academic and popular writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20 ► pp. 1 ff.
Zhao, Ning
2023. A corpus-based comparison study of first-person pronoun we in English-language abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 63 ► pp. 101244 ff.
Zhao, Xi, Li Li & Wei Xiao
2023. The diachronic change of research article abstract difficulty across disciplines: a cognitive information-theoretic approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1
Zhou, Min & Zhixiang Sun
2022. Source Work in China-Based and Western SSCI Journal Articles: Preferences of Reporting Structures of English Academic Articles Published in China and in English-Speaking Countries. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 45:4 ► pp. 596 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.