Measuring iconicity
A quantitative study of lexical and analytic causatives in British English
The idea of isomorphism of form and meaning has played an important role in functionalist theories of syntax and morphology. However, there have been few studies that test this hypothesis empirically on quantitative data. This study aims to fill this gap by testing the predictions made by iconicity theory with the help of statistical hypothesis-testing techniques. The paper focuses on a subtype of isomorphism, namely iconicity of cohesion. The analyses are based on a sample of lexical and analytic causatives from the British National Corpus. The study employs three different operationalisations of the degree of semantic cohesion of the causing and caused events, which are based on English and cross-linguistic data. The form-function correlation is interpreted from the point of view of three possible models of relationships between form, function and/or frequency.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Iconicity theory and causatives
- 3.Analytic and lexical causatives in the British National Corpus: Description of the comparative concepts and the sample
- 3.1Definition of analytic and lexical causatives
- 3.2The sample
- 4.Lexical vs. analytical causatives: Do semantic classes of causative events matter?
- 5.Corpus-driven variable: Causal/non-causal alternation in English
- 6.Cross-linguistic evidence: Inchoative-causative alternation
- 7.Discussion: The form-meaning correlation and how to explain it
- 8.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
Corpus
-
References
References (52)
Corpus
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available online at
[URL].
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000 Transitivity in Tariana. In
R. M. W. Dixon &
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 145–172.
Amberber, Menigstu
2000 Valency-changing and valency-encoding devices in Amharic. In
R. M. W. Dixon &
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 312–332.
Bybee, Joan L.
1985 Diagrammatic iconicity in stem – inflection relations. In
John Haiman (ed.), 11–47.
Bybee, Joan L.
2010 Markedness: Iconicity, economy and frequency. In
J. Jung Song (ed.),
Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 131–147. Oxford: OUP.
Bybee, Joan L. & Sandra Thomspon
1997 Three frequency effects in syntax.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, 378–388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Comrie, Bernard & Maria Polinsky
Diessel, Holger
2007 Frequency effects in language acquisition, language use, and diachronic change.
New Ideas in Psychology 251. 108–127.
Diessel, Holger
2008 Iconicity of sequence. A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English.
Cognitive Linguistics 191. 457–482.
Dixon, R. M. W. & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
(eds.) 2000 Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity. Cambridge: CUP.
Du Bois, John
1985 Competing motivations. In
John Haiman (ed.), 343–365.
Fodor, Jerry
1970 Three reasons for not deriving “kill” from “cause to die.”
Linguistic Inquiry 1(4). 429–438.
Givón, Talmy
1990 Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. II1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Haiman, John
1983 Iconic and economic motivation.
Language 59(4). 781–819.
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In
Bernard Comrie &
Maria Polinsky (eds.), 87–120.
Haspelmath, Martin
2005 Universals of causative verb formation. Paper presented at LSA Institute, MIT,
LSA.206, 2 August 2005.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008a Creating economical morphosyntactic patterns in language change. In
Jeff Good (ed.),
Linguistic Universals and Language Change, 185–214. Oxford: OUP.
Haspelmath, Martin
2008b Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries.
Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 1–33.
Haspelmath, Martin
2010 Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies.
Language 86(3). 663–687.
Haspelmath, Martin, Andreea Calude, Michael Spagnol, Heiko Narrog & Elif Bamyaci
2014 Coding causal – noncausal verb alternations: A form – frequency correspondence explanation.
Journal of Linguistics 501. 587–625.
Hinton, Leanne
1982 How to cause in Mixtec.
Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, 354–363.
Hollmann, Willem B.
2004 The iconicity of infinitival complementation in Present-day English causatives. In
Constantino Maeder,
Olga Fischer, &
William J. Herlofsky (eds.),
Outside-in – inside-out: Iconicity in language and literature, 287–306. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thompson
1980 Transitivity in grammar and discourse.
Language 56(2). 251–299.
Johnson, Mark
1987 The Body in the Mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keller, Rudi
1994 On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.
Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen
1994 The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events.
Cognitive Linguistics 51. 115–156.
LaPolla, Randi J.
2000 Valency-changing derivations in Dulong/Rawang. In
R. M. W. Dixon &
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), 282–311.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappoport Hovav
1995 Unaccusativity: At the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levshina, Natalia
2015b European analytic causatives as a comparative concept: Evidence from a parallel corpus of film subtitles.
Folia Linguistica 49(2). 487–520.
Levshina, Natalia
2016 Why we need a token-based typology: A case study of analytic and lexical causatives in fifteen European languages.
Folia Linguistica 50(2). 507–542.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson
2001 Corpus Linguistics. An Introduction. 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1969 Nekotoryje verojatnostnyje universalii v glagol’nom slovoobrazonanii [Some probabilistic universals in verbal derivation]. In
I. F. Vardul’ (ed.),
Jazykovyje universalii i lingvističeskaja tipologija, 106–114. Moscow: Nauka.
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P.
1976 Kausativkonstruktionen. Tübingen: TBL.
Patterson, Betty S. J.
1974 A study of Korean causatives.
Hawaii Working Papers in Linguistics 6(4). 1–52.
Piantadosi, Steven T., Harry Tilly & Edward Gibson
2011 Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication.
PNAS 108(9). 3526–3529.
R Core Team
2014 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Rosenbach, Anette
2003 Aspects of iconicity and economy in the choice between the s-genitive and the of-genitive in English. In
Günter Rohdenburg &
Britta Mondorf (eds.),
Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 379–411. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2005 New York, Dayton (Ohio), and the Raw Frequency Fallacy.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1–2. 295–301.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
Steger, Maria & Edgar W. Schneider
2012 Complexity as a function of iconicity: The case of complement clause constructions in New Englishes. In
Bernd Kortmann &
Benedikt Szmrecsanyi (eds.),
Linguistic complexity: Second language acquisition, indigenization, contact, 156–191. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Taylor, John
2012 The Mental Corpus: How language is represented in the mind. Oxford: OUP.
Verhagen, Arie & Suzanne Kemmer
1997 Interaction and causation: Causative constructions in modern standard Dutch.
Journal of Pragmatics 241. 61–82.
Zipf, George K.
1949 Human behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
SCHNEIDER, ULRIKE
2023.
Reflexive analytic causatives: a diachronic analysis of transitivity parameters.
English Language and Linguistics 27:4
► pp. 789 ff.
Uljas, Sami
2021.
Iconicity and Semantic-Structural Mapping in Earlier Egyptian Complementation.
Lingua Aegyptia - Journal of Egyptian Language Studies :29
► pp. 215 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.