Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 25:3 (2018) ► pp.363391


BNC The British National Corpus, later part 20th century, 100 m words. Department of Linguistics, University of Oxford. [URL].
OBC: Huber, Magnus, Magnus Nissel, Patrick Maiwald & Bianca Widlitzki 2012The Old Bailey Corpus. Spoken English in the 18th and 19th Centuries. [URL].
Innsbruck Corpus of Middle English Prose
1150–1500, 7.8m words. Compiled by Manfred Markus. [URL].
PPCEME: The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English 1500–1710, 1.7 m words. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, 1st edn, [URL].
PPCMBE: The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English 1700–1914, 1 m words. Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, 1st edn, [URL].
PPCME2: The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, second edition 1150–1500, 1.2 m words. Compiled by Anthony Kroch and Ann Taylor. [URL]
YCOE: Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths 2003The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. University of York. [URL].
The Leuven Drama Corpus
1965–1972, 1m words. Compiled by D. Geens, L. K. Engels and W. Martin.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2013Historical-comparative reconstruction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale, The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 329–344. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte
2000Archaic syntax in Indo-European. The spread of transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Bergliot & Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen
2005The relation accompanying circumstance across languages. Conflict between linguistic expression and discourse subordination? SPRIKreports 32. Available online at [URL].
Berent, G. P.
1973Absolute constructions as ‘subordinate clauses’. In Claudia Corum, T. Cedric Smith-Stark & Ann Weiser (eds.), You take the high node and I’ll take the low node. Papers from the Comparative Syntax Festival, 147–154. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2003Subordination. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalisation in language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2004An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hannay, Mike & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2002Effective writing in English: A sourcebook. Bussum: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in a cross-linguistic perspective, 1–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional change in English. Developments in allomorphy, word formation, and syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Th. Gries
2009Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24(4). 385–401. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1965A Modern English grammar on historical principles: Part V. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin & Toril Swan
2009The grammaticalization and subjectification of adverbial -ing clauses (converb clauses) in English. English Language and Linguistics 131. 337–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klemola, Juhani & Markku Filppula
1992Subordinating uses of and in the history of English. In Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas
2004Text, textsorte, sprachgeschichte: Englische Partizipial- und Gerundialkonstruktionen 1100 bis 1700. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komen, J. H. M.
1994Over de ontwikkeling van absolute constructies. Amsterdam: Buijten en Schipperhejn.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
1990Adverbial participles, gerunds and absolute constructions in the languages of Europe. In Johannes Beclert, Giuluano Bernini & Claude Budart (eds.), Toward a typology of European languages, 337–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1991Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995Adverbial participial clauses in English. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross- linguistic perspective, 189–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Leino, Jaakko
2013Information Structure. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 329–344. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
1989A review of relevance. Journal of Linguistics 251. 455–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller-Lancé, Johannes
1994Absolute Konstruktionen vom Altlatein bis zum Neufranzösischen: Ein Epochenvergleich unter Berücksichtigung von Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Pol, Nikki van de
2012Between copy and cognate: The origin of absolutes in Old and Middle English. In Martine Robbeets & Lars Johanson (eds.), The origins of bound morphology, 297–322. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2016The development of the absolute construction in English: Between bird’s eye view and magnifying glass. Leuven: University of Leuven PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Pol, Nikki van de & Hubert Cuyckens
2013Gradualness in change in English augmented absolutes. In: Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds.), Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, 341-366. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2014The diffusion of English absolutes: A diachronic register study. In Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.), Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns [Studies in Corpus Linguistics], 341–365. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pol, Nikki van de & Lauren Fonteyn
2014All for one and one for all: The formation, evolution and functions of Modern English ing-clauses. Paper presented at ICEHL, Leuven, 14–18 July 2014.
2015Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics 201. 185–219.Google Scholar
Río-Rey, Carmen
2002Subject control and coreference in Early Modern English free adjuncts and absolutes. English Language and Linguistics 6(2). 309–323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppel, Antonia
2013Absolute constructions in Early Indo-European [Cambridge Classical Studies]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stump, G. T.
1985The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Timofeeva, Olga
2010Non-finite constructions in Old English with special reference to syntactic borrowing from Latin. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 80. Jyväskylä: WS Bookwell Oy.Google Scholar
2012Latin absolute constructions and their Old English equivalents: Interfaces between form and information structure. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José Lopez-Couso & Bettelou Los, Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 228-242. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus
1973An historical syntax of the English language. Vol. II1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar