Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 25:3 (2018) ► pp.335362
Barnard, Christopher
2003Pearl Harbor in Japanese high school history textbooks: The grammar and semantics of responsibility. In J. R. Martin & Ruth Wodak (eds.), Re/reading the past: Critical and functional perspectives on time and value, 247–271. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barton, Keith C.
2004Primary sources in history: Breaking through the myths. The Phi Delta Kappan 86(10). 745–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
2003The structuring of pedagogic discourse (Vol. IV of Class, codes and control). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brune, Nick
2003Defining Canada: History, identity and culture. Oakville: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline
2000History as discourse: Construals of time, cause and appraisal. Sydney: University of New South Wales PhD thesis.Google Scholar
2006Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cortazzi, Martin & Lixian Jin
2000Evaluating evaluation in narrative. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 102–120.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Doris Kearns
1991Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas L.
1998Objectivity is not neutrality: Explanatory schemes in history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hoey, Michael
1983On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hood, Susan
2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1989Evaluation in experimental research articles. Birmingham: University of Birmingham PhD thesis.Google Scholar
1994Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995Evaluation and ideology in scientific writing. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 57–73. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
2000Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 176–207.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1994Hedging in academic textbooks and EAP. English for Specific Purposes 3(3). 239–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lee, Sook Hee
2015Evaluative stances in persuasive essays by undergraduate students: Focusing on appreciation resources. Text & Talk 35(1). 49–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary
2003Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text 23(2). 285–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1993Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and the humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 221–267. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Karl A. Maton & Erika S. Matruglio
2010Historical cosmologies: Epistemology and axiology in Australian secondary school history discourse. Revista Signos 43(74). 443–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moss, Gillian
Myskow, Gordon
2017Surveying the historical landscape: The evaluative voice of history textbooks. Functional Linguistics 4(7). 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018aCalibrating the ‘right values’: The role of critical inquiry tasks in social studies textbooks. Visual Communication. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018bChanges in attitude: Evaluative language in secondary school and university history textbooks. Linguistics and Education 431. 53–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press. Appraisal in history: Construals of significance, fortune, and status. Linguistics and the Human Sciences.
Ngo, Thu & Len Unsworth
2015Reworking the Appraisal framework in ESL research: Refining attitude resources. Functional Linguistics 2(1). 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nir, Bracha & Elisabeth Zima
Novick, Peter
1988That noble dream: The ‘objectivity question’ and the American historical profession. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa
2003How contemporary history is presented in Chilean middle school textbooks. Discourse & Society 14(5). 639–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa & Claudio Pinuer
2013Valorative prosody and the symbolic construction of time in recent national historical discourses. Discourse Studies 15(1). 43–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Appraisal framework and critical discourse studies: A joint approach to the study of historical memories from an intermodal perspective. International Journal of Language Studies 101. 5–32.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul
2004Memory, history and forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, Mary J., Mariana Achugar & Teresa Oteíza
2004The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quarterly 38(1). 67–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seixas, Peter
1997Mapping the terrain of historical significance. Social Education 61(1). 22–27.Google Scholar
2000Schweigen! Die Kinder! In Peter N. Stearns, Peter Seixas & Sam Wineburg (eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives, 19–37. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tann, Ken
2010Imagining communities: A multifunctional approach to identity management in texts. In Monika Bednarek & J. R. Martin (eds.), New Discourse on Language, 163–194. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Jianglin Zhou
2000Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 121–141.Google Scholar
Veel, Robert & Caroline Coffin
1996Learning to think like an historian: The language of secondary school history. In Ruqaiya Hasan & Geoff Williams (eds.), Literacy in Society, 191–231. London: Longman.Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2003Beyond modality and hedging: A dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance. Text 23(2). 259–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media 12(3). 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wignell, Peter
1994Genre across the curriculum. Linguistics and Education 6(4). 355–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Baguley, Margaret & Martin Kerby
2022. A beautiful and devilish thing: children’s picture books and the 1914 Christmas Truce. Visual Communication 21:4  pp. 518 ff. DOI logo
Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages 0:0 DOI logo
Myskow, Gordon
2018. Changes in attitude: Evaluative language in secondary school and university history textbooks. Linguistics and Education 43  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Schleppegrell, Mary J., Sida Sun & Chauncey Monte-Sano
2023. The value of models to support students' voice in middle school social studies argument writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 61  pp. 101043 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.