Article published In:
Evidentiality in language and cognitionEdited by Lena Ekberg and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 16:1] 2009
► pp. 63–88
Edited by Lena Ekberg and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 16:1] 2009
► pp. 63–88
Seem and evidentiality
The paper is an empirical, corpus-based analysis of the functions of seem with different complementation structures and in impersonal constructions as well as in combinations with an experiencer. The focus is on describing how evidentiality (e.g. inferencing/observation or hearsay evidence) interacts with degrees of certainty or factivity of the construction. Other features are subjectivity and intersubjectivity (shared or non-shared information). Translations from English into Swedish have been used to get a more fine-grained picture of the degree of certainty expressed by seem and its relationship to the type of evidence. The different constructions with seem and their functions are explained in a grammaticalization perspective. Seem conforms to a number of principles such as layering and divergence (Hopper). Seem to is the most grammaticalized form and can be regarded as an evidential marker which is similar to the modal auxiliaries.
Cited by
Cited by 34 other publications
Abraham, Werner
2020. Modality in Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics, 
Almeida, Francisco Alonso
2015. The functions ofseemandparecerin early medical writing. Discourse Studies 17:2 ► pp. 121 ff.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco
2013. An Analysis of the Grammatical and Pragmatic Values of Seem in the C19th Section of the Corpus of English Philosophy Texts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 95 ► pp. 178 ff.
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco & Mª Isabel González-Cruz
2012. Exploring Male and Female Voices through Epistemic Modality and Evidentiality in Some Modern English Travel Texts on the Canaries. Research in Language 10:3 ► pp. 323 ff.
Brook, Marisa
2018. Taking it up a level: Copy-raising and cascaded tiers of morphosyntactic change. Language Variation and Change 30:2 ► pp. 231 ff.
Brook, Marisa
2023.
As if, as though, and like in Canadian English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 44:3 ► pp. 381 ff.
Diewald, Gabriele & Katerina Stathi
Dolata-Zaród, Anna
2021. Text operators as dialogical mechanisms in judgments of the French Court of Cassation. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
ERK EMEKSİZ, Zeynep
2021. Visual perception verbs and degrees of certainty in Turkish: The case of görünmek and gözükmek. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 32:2 ► pp. 69 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
Gray, Bethany & Douglas Biber
2014. Stance markers. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 219 ff.
Grichin, Sergei & Olga Ulyanova
2023. Evidential Text Units in Russian Research Articles. In Science and Global Challenges of the 21st Century – Innovations and Technologies in Interdisciplinary Applications [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 622], ► pp. 135 ff.
Hasselgård, Hilde
2023. Seem and Appear and Their Norwegian Verbal Counterparts: A Cross-Register Contrastive Study. English Studies 104:1 ► pp. 173 ff.
Jaakola, Minna
2018. Chapter 5. Finnish evidential adverbs in argumentative texts. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 121 ff.
Jaakola, Minna
2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni ‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 255 ff.
Khafaga, Ayman
2023. Strategic lexicalization in courtroom discourse: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities 10:1
Kratochvílová, Dana
Lampert, Gunther
2020. Chapter 5. How and why seem became an evidential. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 109 ff.
Lenoble, Christophe
2021. Stative progressives in Inner and Outer Circle varieties of English. World Englishes 40:3 ► pp. 318 ff.
Lien, Chinfa
2017. The emergence of e5 khuan2
个款 as a sensory evidential marker in TSM. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Lorenz, David & David Tizón-Couto
2020. Chapter 4. Not just frequency, not just modality. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 79 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014. On the origin of clausal parenthetical constructions: Epistemic/evidential parentheticals withseem
and impersonalthink. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 189 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2015. Epistemic/evidential markers of the type verb + complementizer. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 93 ff.
Miecznikowski, Johanna
2018. Evidential and Argumentative Functions of Dynamic Appearance Verbs in Italian: The Example of Rivelare and Emergere. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 73 ff.
Miecznikowski, Johanna & Elena Musi
2015. Verbs of Appearance and Argument Schemes: Italian Sembrare as an Argumentative Indicator. In Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory [Argumentation Library, 28], ► pp. 259 ff.
Mortelmans, Tanja
2017. Seem-type verbs in Dutch and German. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 123 ff.
MÉLAC, ERIC
2022. The grammaticalization of evidentiality in English. English Language and Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 331 ff.
Nieuwenhuijsen, Dorien
Rocci, Andrea
2017. Introduction. In Modality in Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 29], ► pp. 1 ff.
Ruskan, Anna
2017. Markers of evidentiality in Lithuanian newspaper discourse. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 271 ff.
Söderqvist, Erika Berglind
2020. Informational and relational functions of evidentiality in interaction. Studia Neophilologica 92:1 ► pp. 56 ff.
Whitt, Richard Jason
2016. Evidentiality in Early Modern English Medical Treatises (1500–1700). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.