Review article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 16:2 (2009) ► pp.265281
Aarts, Bas
1998English binominal noun phrases. Transactions of the Philological Society 961. 117–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Modelling linguistic gradience. Studies in Language 28 (1). 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Syntactic gradience. The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abney, Steven P.
1987The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Acuña-Fariña, J. Carlos
1996The puzzle of apposition. Santiago: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
2006A constructional network in appositive space. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (1). 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The psycholinguistics of agreement in English and Spanish: a tutorial overview. Lingua 1191. 389–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics.
Berg, Thomas
1998The resolution of number agreement conflicts in English and German agreement patterns. Linguistics 361. 41–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 131. 391–419.Google Scholar
Carlson, Katy, Charles Clifton, Jr. & Lyn Frazier
2001Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory and Language 451. 58–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville S.
2006Agreement. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter
1999Syntactic nuts: Hard cases in syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa
2004Language, mind and brain. Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Paul Kay & Mary C. O’Connor
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language 641. 501–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A.
1998Learning to parse? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 271. 285–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela D.
1995The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 501. 259–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: Chicago UP.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work. The nature of generalization in language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Ray Jackendoff
2004The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 801. 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline
1980On the syntax and semantics of PP extraposition. Linguistic Inquiry II1. 636–78.Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1953On resolving the close apposition. American Speech 281. 165–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John
1994A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Roger
1981Towards an account of the possessive construction: NP’s N and N of NP. Journal of Linguistics 171. 247–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1955Attribution and apposition in English. American Speech 301. 99–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1977X-bar syntax: a study of phrase structure. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
2008Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language 841. 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul & Charles J. Fillmore
1999Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What’s X doing Y? construction. Language 751. 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keizer, Evelien
2005aThe discourse function of close appositions. Neophilologus 891. 447–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bClose appositions. In: Casper de Groot & Kees Hengeveld (eds.). Morphosyntactic expression in Functional Grammar, 381–417. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2. Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Donald W.
1952Close apposition: an unresolved pattern. American Speech 271. 268–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Donna J.
1989Predication theory: A case study for indexing theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Gerald S., Sean Wallis & Bas Aarts
Poutsma, Hendrik
1904A grammar of late modern English, Part I1. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2002Genitive variation in English. Conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheepers, Christoph. & Crocker, Matthew W.
2004Constituent order priming: form reading to listening: a visual world study. In Manuel Carreiras & Charles Clifton (eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension, 167–186. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1977Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal syntax, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Swinney, David A.
1979Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 181. 645–659. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1996Possessives in English: An exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2002Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert. D., Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar