Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 26:2 (2019) ► pp. 139176


Andersen, Henning
2001Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic change in progress, 225–248. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
2003Analogy: The warp and woof of cognition. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 425–440. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2001Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2008Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea
(eds.) 2015Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald
(eds.) 2008Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2010Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In Traugott & Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Alied & Saskia Daalder
1977Syntaktische theorie en taalbeschrijving. Muiderberg: Coutinho.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti, Nigel Vincent & George Walden
2015On constructing a theory of grammatical change. Transactions of the philological society 113(3). 363–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2003Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan & James L. McClellan
2005Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. Linguistic Review 22. 381–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Jung-hsing
2006The Chinese copula shì and its origin: A cognitive-based approach. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 4(1). 131–156.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-ren
1968A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
2001Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chen, Mianhua
2009Some issues about construction grammar. Foreign Language Education and Studies 5. 337–400.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2009Analysing reanalysis. Lingua 119. 1728–1755. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012The course of actualization. Language 88. 601–633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on copular sentences, clefts and pseudo-clefts. Leuven: Leuven University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele
2006Context types in grammaticalization as constructions. Constructions SV, 1–9.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization. Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feng, Shengli
1993The copula in classical Chinese declarative judgment sentences. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 21. 277–311.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay
1997Berkeley Construction Grammar. Available online at http://​www​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/~kay​/bcg​/ConGram​.html
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. Language 64. 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2007Morphosyntactic change: Functional and formal perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979On understanding grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1991The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization Vol. II., 257–310. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1998Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language 22. 315–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline: The nature of grammaticalization, 17–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Rob
1992Dynamic biogeography. New York, NY: CUP.Google Scholar
Higgins, Roger Francis
1979The pseudo-cleft construction in English. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation and syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Th. Gries
2016Quantitative approaches to diachronic corpus linguistics. In Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, 36–53. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization: A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale
2013aIntroduction. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), 1–12.Google Scholar
(eds.) 2013bThe Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar. New York, NY: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003Grammaticalization (revised edn.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Cheng
1957Lun Nanbeichao yiqian de xici ‘On the copula before the Nanbei Dynasty’. Yuyan Yanjiu 2. 1–22.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1982Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Phd Thesis.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
2002The clause complements. In Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum, The Cambridge grammar of the English language, ch4. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2012Grammaticalization as optimization. In Dianna Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes, 15–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1975 [1965]The evolution of grammatical categories. In Jerzy Kuryłowicz, Esquisses linguistiques, Vol. II. 38–54. Munich: Fink. (Originally published in Diogenes 51. 55–71 1965.)Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1977Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile XX. 303–318.Google Scholar
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: LINCOM EUROPA (2nd, rev. edn. of Thoughts on grammaticalization: a programmatic sketch 1982).Google Scholar
2004Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für germanistische linguistik 32. 152–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1976Subject and Topic: A new typology. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic, 458–489. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1977A mechanism for the development of copula morphemes. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 419–444. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming
2004The construction grammar and study of Chinese. Chinese Language 5. 412–479.Google Scholar
Ma, Jianzhong
1898Mashi wentong ‘Ma’s grammar’. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1958 [1912]L’évolution des formes grammaticales. In Antoine Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, 130–148. Paris: Champion. (Originally published in Scientia (Rivista di scienza) XXII 1912)Google Scholar
Narahara, Tomiko
2002The Japanese copula: forms and functions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14. 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Amanda L.
2012The English IT-cleft: A constructional account and a diachronic investigation. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peng, Rui
2013A diachronic construction grammar account of the Chinese cause-complement pivotal construction. Language Sciences 40. 53–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter
2014Constructions and environments: Copular, passive and related constructions. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, Alain
1996Recent Issues in Chinese Historical Syntax. In C.-T. J. Huang & Y.-H. A. Li (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peyraube, Alain & Thekla Wiebusch
1994Problems relating to the history of different copulas in ancient Chinese. In Matthew Y. Chen & Ovid J. L. Tseng (eds.), In Honor of William S-Y. Wang: interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, 383–404. Taipei: Pyramid Press.Google Scholar
Pines, Yuri
2002Lexical Changes in Zhanguo Texts. Journal of the American Oriental Society 122(4). 691–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustet, Regina
2003Copulas: Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon. Oxford studies in typology and linguistic theory. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G.
1995Outline of classical Chinese grammar. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Romance futures. Folia Linguistica Historica XIII. 219–258.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A.
2012Sign-based construction grammar: An informal synopsis. In Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-based construction grammar, 69–202. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Shi, Yuzhi & Na Li
2001Hanyu yufahua de lichen – xingtai jufa fazhan de dongyin he jizhi ‘The path of Chinese grammaticalization – the motivation and mechanism of mophosyntactic change’. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar
Smirnova, Elena
2015Constructionalization and constructional change: The role of context in the development of constructions. In Jóhanna Barðdal, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.), Diachronic construction grammar, 81–106. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stassen, Leon
1997Intransitive predication. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Takahito, Yamada
2004Mengzi de Chengshu Niandai ‘The date of Mengzi. Limingguan Dongyang Shixue No.27.Google Scholar
Tang, Yuming
1991Zhuming zhongnian yuyanxuejia zixuanji ‘Self-selected articles from famous middle aged linguists’. Hefei: Anhui Education Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2011Grammaticalization and mechanisms of change. In Bernd Heine & Heike Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 19–30. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2010Issues in constructional approaches to grammaticalization in English. In Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues, 51–72. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Hongjun
1987Guanyu Mingcihua biaoji “zhi” de Xiaoshi ‘The disappearance of the nominalizer ‘zhe’’. Yuyanxue luncong 4. 158–196.Google Scholar
Wang, Li
1937Zhongguo Wenfa zhong de Xici ‘The linking verb in Chinese gammar’. In Li Wang 1958 Hanyushi lunwenji, 212–276. Beijing: Beijing Press.Google Scholar
1958Hanyushi lunwenji ‘The collection of articles on the history of Chinese’. Beijing: Beijing Press.Google Scholar
Wei, Shimin
2002Shishuoxinyu ji Zhu Chengshu Niandai Kao ‘The dates of Shishuoxinyu and its commentary’. Changzhou Shizhuan Xuebao 3. 19–20.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong & Danqing Liu
1998The structure and functions of Topics. Shanghai: Education Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Bojun
1981Chunqiu Zuozhuan zhu ‘The commentary of Chunqiu Zuozhuan’. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
Yen, Sian L.
1986The origin of the copula shì in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 14(2). 227–241.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong & Chaofen Sun
2013A copula analysis of shì in the Chinese cleft construction. Language and Linguistics 14(4). 755–789.Google Scholar
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2015The constructionalization of the Chinese cleft construction. Studies in Language 39(2). 459–491. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Deng, Yi, Foong Ha Yap & Winnie Chor
2020. Negative attitudinal uses of quantifying classifier di in Wugang Xiang. Journal of Pragmatics 160  pp. 14 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong
2020. The development of the Chinese expressive zhenshide: A diachronic constructional approach. Lingua 248  pp. 102981 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong, Yue Zhang & Haiping Long
2021. Origin of Modern Chinese pragmatic markers bushi: Negative copula or negative adjective?. Lingua 250  pp. 102922 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.