Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 25:3 (2018) ► pp.392–412

Variation between modal adverbs in British English

The cases of maybe and perhaps

| Japan Society for the Promotion of Science | Setsunan University | Kyoto University

This study investigates the use and distribution of the synonymous adverbs maybe and perhaps in order to determine their functional similarities and differences. After extracting usage data from the British National Corpus (BNC), this study explores the following factors by analyzing the target adverbs in a larger context: (i) the kind of register, (ii) the kind of NP chosen as the subject in maybe/perhaps clauses, (iii) the kind of modal verb used in the same clause, and (iv) the position occupied by the target adverbs in a clause. The corpus analysis demonstrates that maybe is more prone to subjective use while perhaps is a more strongly grammaticalized item, and that the factors related to a highly subjective context contribute much to the variation between the adverbs. In addition, I suggest that both maybe and perhaps (in combination with modal verbs or in final position) can be used in an intersubjective context.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous descriptions of maybe and perhaps
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Distribution in speech and writing
    • 4.2Modal collocations
    • 4.3Subject form
    • 4.4Position
    • 4.5Grammaticality and (inter)subjectivity
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16009.suz
References
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges
(eds.) 2014 Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellert, Irena
1977 On semantic and distributional properties of sentential adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2). 337–351.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1988 Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 111. 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9(1). 93–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen
1998 Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech & Susan Conrad
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1968 Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 21. 119–127.Google Scholar
1977 Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
2008 The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985 Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), Handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 821. 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer
1983 The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
2004 Principles of adverbial distribution in the lower clause. Lingua 1141. 755–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Speaker-oriented adverbs. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 271. 497–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Adverbs and light verbs. In Lauren E. Clemens & Chi-Ming L. Liu (eds.), Proceedings of the 22rd North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-22) and the 18th International Conference on Chinese Linguistics (IACL-18) 2, 178–195. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Facchinetti, Roberta, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer
(eds.) 2003 Modality in contemporary English. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Henry W.
2004 Fowler’s modern English usage, 3rd edn. Revised by Robert W. Burchfield. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979 On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
1969 Studies in English adverbial usage. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1970 Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 61. 322–361.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011 Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012a Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds.), English historical linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 153–175. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language and Communication 32(3). 182–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2). 375–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoye, Leo
1997 Adverbs and modality in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hoye, Leo & Mihai Zdrenghea
1995 Modals and adverbs in English with reference to Romanian. Rask 21. 25–50.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1977 What must and can must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 11. 337–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1972 The pragmatics of modality. CLS 81. 229–246.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1990 Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 11. 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Don
1976 Some notes on English modals. In James D. McCawley (ed.), Syntax and semantics 7: Notes from the linguistic underground, 387–398. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2004 Meaning and the English verb, 3rd edn. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Lenker, Ursula
2010 Argument and rhetoric: Adverbial connectors in the history of English. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, Hans
2009 Corpus linguistics and the description of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Longman Language Activator
, 2nd edn. 2002 Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Marín-Arrese, Juana I., Marta Carretero, Jorge Arús Hita & Johan van der Auwera
(eds.) 2013 English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2001 Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Notions of (inter)subjectivity. English Text Construction 5(1). 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxford Thesaurus of English
, 3rd edn. 2009 Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1990 Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2001 Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2000 Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
2006 Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 1161. 1688–1702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Michael R.
1983 Modal expressions in English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
2003 Cognitive complexity and horror aequi as factors determining the use of interrogative clause linkers in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammatical variation in English, 205–249. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer
2007 The Semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
2005 Covarying collexemes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 11. 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swan, Michael
2005 Practical English usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril
1988 Sentence adverbials in English: A synchronic and diachronic investigation. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Tancredi, Christopher
2007 A multi-model modal theory of I-semantics: Part I: Modals. Tokyo: University of Tokyo manuscript.Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel
2002 An introduction to American English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 651. 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian Joseph & Richard Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–647. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization, 29–71. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction 5(1). 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher
2002 Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
1984 An analysis of epistemic possibility and probability. English Studies 65(2). 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Molencki, Rafał
2021. The Grammaticalization of the Epistemic Adverb Perhaps in Late Middle and Early Modern English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 56:s1 ► pp. 411 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Jiangping
2021. A corpus-based study of successive patterns of Chinese modals. Asian Languages and Linguistics 2:2 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.