Give as a light verb
Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) have received widespread attention. Research on these constructions, however, has
for the most part focused exclusively on their syntactic and lexical-semantic properties. Additionally, studies devoted to
specific LVCs tend to neglect the phrasal-semantic and pragmatic variation brought about by the combination of a light verb with
different nominal complements. This paper tries to fill those gaps by means of a quantitative and qualitative corpus-based study
of Light give Constructions (LgiveCs). The quantitative analysis investigates frequencies of LgiveCs in
British English and compares them across spoken and written (fiction) discourse, which reveals a high frequency of this
construction in speech, especially in combinations of give with a ring, a kiss and an
answer. When these combinations are excluded, LgiveCs are significantly more frequent in writing. In a
complementary qualitative approach, we highlight the structural and discursive features of the construction and attempt to explore
the factors that motivate the frequent use of the LgiveC in British English.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.
give as a light verb
- 3.Research goals and methodology
- 4.Light give in spoken and written (fiction) discourse: Frequency and distribution
- 5.The form and meaning of the LgiveC
- 5.1Semantic features
- 5.2Patterns of modification and transitivity
- 5.3Grammatical choices within the verb phrase
- 5.4Summary
- 6.The LgiveC in context
- 6.1Discourse-organisation and textual meanings
- 6.2Intersubjective and interactional meanings
- 6.3Summary
- 7.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (36)
Algeo, John
1995 Having a look at the expanded predicate. In
Bas Aarts &
Charles F. Meyer (eds.),
The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description, 203–217. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alsina, Alex
1993 Predicate composition: A theory of syntactic function alternations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD thesis.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brugman, Claudia
2001 Light verbs and polysemy.
Language Sciences 23(4.5). 551–578.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam
2003 The light verb jungle. In
Gülsat Aygen,
Claire Bowern &
Conor Quinn (eds.),
Harvard working papers in linguistics. Volume 9 of papers from the GSAS/Dudley house workshop on light verbs, 1–49. Harvard, MA: Harvard University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butt, Miriam
2010 The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In
Mengistu Amberber,
Brett Baker &
Mark Harvey (eds.),
Complex predicates: Cross-linguistic perspectives on event structure, 48–78. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Davies, Mark
2004– BYU-BNC (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at
[URL]
Downing, Angela
2015 English grammar: A university course. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Firbas, Jan
1992 Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele
2003 Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5). 219–224.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele
2013 Constructionist approaches. In
Thomas Hoffmann &
Graeme Trousdale (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar, 15–31. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, Sylviane & Fanny Meunier
Hannay, Mike & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2017 Effective writing in English: A sourcebook, 3rd edn. Bussum: Coutinho.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney
2002 The clause: Complements. In
Rodney Huddleston &
Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), 213–321.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
2002 The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunston, Susan & John Sinclair
2000 A local grammar of evaluation. In
Susan Hunston &
Geoff Thompson (eds.),
Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 74–101. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kearns, Kate
1988/2002 Light verbs in English. Manuscript, MIT.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo
2006 The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity.
Linguistics 44(3). 569–612.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith
2009 Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Live, Anna H.
1973 The take-have phrasal in English.
Linguistics 11(95). 31–50.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Kazuhiro Teruya
2014 Projection as a fractal motif: Semantic and lexicogrammatical manifestations. Draft.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondorf, Britta
2016 “Snake legs it to freedom”: Dummy it as pseudo-object.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1). 73–102.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Muller, Ernst-August
1978 Funktionsverbgefuge vom Typ ‘give a smile’ und ähnliche Konstruktionen. Eine textorientierte Untersuchung im Ahmen eines doppelschichtigen Semantikmodells. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, John
1996 Give: A cognitive linguistic study. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, John and Sally Rice
2006 Transitivity schemas of English EAT and DRINK in the BNC. In
Stefan Th. Gries &
Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.),
Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 225–260. Berlin: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, Martha, David Gildea & Paul Kingsbury
2005 The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles.
Computational Linguistics 31(1). 71–106.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinclair, John
(ed. in chief) 1990 Collins COBUILD English grammar. London: Harper Collins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan T. Gries
Stein, Gabriele
1991 The phrasal verb type “to have a look” in Modern English.
International Review of Applied Linguistics 291. 1–29.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wierzbicka, Anna
1982 Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language 58(4). 753–799.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Andrew
2009 Speech, writing and discourse type. In
Jonathan Culpeper,
Francis Katamba,
Paul Kerswill,
Ruth Wodak &
Tony McEnery (eds.),
English language: Description, variation and context, 425–438. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittenberg, Eva
2016 With light verb constructions from syntax to concepts.
Potsdam Cognitive Science Series, vol. 7. Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wittenberg, Eva, Ray Jackendoff, Gina Kuperberg, Martin Paczynski, Jesse Snedeker & Heike Wiese
2014 The processing and representation of light verb constructions. In
Asaf Bachrach,
Isabelle Roy &
Linnaea Stockall (eds.),
Structuring the argument: Multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure (
Language Faculty and Beyond 10), 61–80. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Giparaitė, Judita
2024.
A corpus-based analysis of light verb constructions with MAKE and DO in British English.
Kalbotyra 76
► pp. 18 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.