Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 17:2 (2010) ► pp.243254
References (17)
References
Bache, Carl. 2008. English tense and aspect in Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. A critical appraisal and an alternative. London & Oakville: Equinox.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2003a. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003b. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P. 1997. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics: the Cardiff Grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar. Helicon 221. 55–136.Google Scholar
2000a. A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 2061.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000b. In place of Halliday’s “verbal group”, Part 1: Evidence from the problems of Halliday’s representations and the relative simplicity of the proposed alternative. Word 51(2). 157–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000c. In place of Halliday’s “verbal group”, Part 2: Evidence from generation, semantics and interruptability. Word 51(3). 327–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics: The Cardiff Grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar (2nd edn.). Centre for Language and Communication Research, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
2008a. Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics: the Cardiff Grammar as an extension and simplification of Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar (in Chinese, trans. Huang Guowen, He Wei & Liao Chuyan). In Huang Guowen, He Wei & Liao Chuyan (eds.), An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: The Cardiff Model (in Chinese) . Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
2008b. Invitación a la Gramática Sistémica Funcional. La Gramática de Cardiff como extensión y simplificación de la Gramática Sistémica Funcional de Halliday (trans. José Maria Gil & Adolfo Martín Carcia). Mar del Plata, Argentina: University of Mar del Plata Press.Google Scholar
Forthcoming a. Functional syntax handbook: Analyzing English at the level of form. London: Equinox.
Forthcoming b. Alternative architectures for Systemic Functional Linguistics: How do we choose? London: Equinox.
Fawcett, R. P., Tucker, Gordon H. & Lin, Yuen Q. 1993. How a systemic functional grammar works: the role of realization in realization. In Helmut Horacek & Michael Zock (eds.) New concepts in Natural Language Generation, 114–186. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1994a. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994b. Systemic theory. In Ronald E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds.). The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 4505–4508. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Shang 尚培珠, Peizhu, Wendy Elvira-García & Paolo Roseano
2021. La modalidad interrogativa en español y en chino: un enfoque funcionalista. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 88  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.