Review published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 17:2 (2010) ► pp. 266275
References
van der Auwera, Johan
2003La grammaire de la modalité. In Mohammed Jadir, (ed.) Développements récents en Grammaire Fonctionnelle, 109–120. Mohammedia: Université Hassan II.Google Scholar
Bondarko, Alexander V.
1991Functional Grammar: A field approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.
2003Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In Jan Rijkhoff & Daniel Garcia Velasco (eds.) The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, 221–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Kazuhiko Tanaka
1996Constraints on tense choice in reported speech. Studia Linguistica 501. 283–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1968Coordination: Its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1978Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1986On the notion “functional explanationBelgian Journal of Linguistics 11. 11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997The theory of Functional Grammar. 21 volumes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. & Jan G. Kooij
1970Beginselen van de algemene taalwetenschap. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1997Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel
2008Innovative coinage: Its place in the grammar. In Christopher S. Butler & Javier Martin Arista (eds.) Deconstructing constructions, 3–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Kees Hengeveld
2002Do we need predicate frames? In Ricardo Mairal Usón & María J. Pérez Quintero (eds.) New perspectives on argument structure, 95–123. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2010Framework-free grammatical theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2010Functional Discourse Grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 367–400. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2005Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1982Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenshaft der Universität Köln [1995, revised edition. München: Lincom Europa.]Google Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre
2009Tense copying in Functional Discourse Grammar. Research Master paper, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M.
1989Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1979Grammaire fonctionnelle du francais. Paris: Crédif.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém
1975A functional analysis of present day English on a general linguistic basis. Ed. by Josef Vachek. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna
To appear. European functionalism. In: Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera eds. The field of linguistics: Europe Berlin Mouton de Gruyter