Cover not available
Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 17:2 (2010) ► pp.266–275
Book review

Kees Hengeveld & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. Functional Discourse Grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. xxiii+503 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-927810-7

Reviewed by
| University of Antwerp
Published online: 3 December 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17.2.06van
References (24)
References
van der Auwera, Johan. 2003. La grammaire de la modalité. In Mohammed Jadir, (ed.) Développements récents en Grammaire Fonctionnelle, 109–120. Mohammedia: Université Hassan II.Google Scholar
Bondarko, Alexander V. 1991. Functional Grammar: A field approach. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 2003. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
2008. Interpersonal meaning in the noun phrase. In Jan Rijkhoff & Daniel Garcia Velasco (eds.) The noun phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, 221–261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 1991. Tense in English: Its structure and use in discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Kazuhiko Tanaka. 1996. Constraints on tense choice in reported speech. Studia Linguistica 501. 283–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1968. Coordination: Its implications for the theory of general linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1978. Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1986. On the notion “functional explanation” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11. 11–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. 21 volumes. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. & Jan G. Kooij. 1970. Beginselen van de algemene taalwetenschap. Utrecht: Spectrum.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel. 2008. Innovative coinage: Its place in the grammar. In Christopher S. Butler & Javier Martin Arista (eds.) Deconstructing constructions, 3–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Kees Hengeveld. 2002. Do we need predicate frames? In Ricardo Mairal Usón & María J. Pérez Quintero (eds.) New perspectives on argument structure, 95–123. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. Framework-free grammatical theory. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 341–365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2010. Functional Discourse Grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.) The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 367–400. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical, and less so. In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101–159. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenshaft der Universität Köln. [1995, revised edition. München: Lincom Europa.]Google Scholar
Leufkens, Sterre. 2009. Tense copying in Functional Discourse Grammar. Research Master paper, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1979. Grammaire fonctionnelle du francais. Paris: Crédif.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém. 1975. A functional analysis of present day English on a general linguistic basis. Ed. by Josef Vachek. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna. To appear. European functionalism. In: Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.) The field of linguistics: Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.