Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp.174–206

Interacting voices structure a text

A quantitative investigation of dialogic elements across structural units in the introductory chapters of history theses

| University of New England

This paper quantitatively measures the distribution of dialogic elements across structural units in the introductory chapters of history theses with the aim of uncovering the roles of dialogic elements in constructing texts. The research was designed to test Bakhtin’s perspective on genre, which holds that viewpoints introduced into a discourse dialogise the text in such a way as to fulfil the text’s goals and structure the text. Results showed significant differences in the densities of dialogic elements across structural units; units that review previous research are highly dialogic, whereas units that present the author’s new research are seldom dialogised. Specifically, previous viewpoints tended to be dialogically endorsed in units that assert the importance of the research topic and dialogically disclaimed in units that indicated problems with previous research. The paper concludes that genre research and pedagogy need to emphasise the strategic deployment of dialogic elements that enable the successful structuring of texts. This study is intended to be one of the first methodological attempts to test the text structuring function of dialogic elements from a corpus-based investigation.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Structural components
    • 3.2Dialogic elements
    • 3.3Coding and statistics
  • 4.Quantitative results and discussion
  • 5.The structural components
    • 5.1Comparison with previous studies
    • 5.2Qualitative observations
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17037.saw
References
Ädel, Annelie & Anna Mauranen
2010 Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9(2). 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, Ummul
1997 Scientific research articles in Malay: A situated discourse analysis. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Anderson, Charles & Kate Day
2005 Purposive environments: Engaging students in the values and practices of history. Higher Education 49(3). 319–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1981 The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, Helen
2012 A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(2). 134–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
1997 Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes 16(3). 313–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bitzer, Lloyd F.
1968 The rhetorical situation. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1(1). 1–14.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina & Marc Silver
2004 Textual voices: A cross-disciplinary study of attribution in academic discourse. In Laurie Anderson & Julia Bamford (eds.), Evaluation in spoken and written academic discourse, 121–141. Roma: Officina.Google Scholar
Bruce, Ian
2010 Textual and discoursal resources used in the essay genre in sociology and English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(3). 153–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bunton, David
2002 Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 57–75. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1986 Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace Chafe & Joanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology, 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell
2011 Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3). 140–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charles, Maggie
2003 ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Fei-Wen & Len Unsworth
2016 Stance-taking as negotiating academic conflict in applied linguistics research article discussion sections. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 241. 43–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cope, Bill & Mary Kalantzis
1993 Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In Bill Cope and Mary Kalantzis (eds.), The Powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing, 1–21. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Cotos, Elena, Sarah Huffman & Stephanie Link
2015 Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191. 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressen, Dacia
2003 Geologists’ implicit persuasive strategies and the construction of evaluative evidence. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 273–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feak, Christine & John M. Swales
2011 Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gil Salom, Luz & Carmen Soler-Monreal
(eds.) 2014 Dialogicity in written specialised genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas J.
1983 Structural semantics: An attempt at a method. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hodge, Bob
1995 Monstrous knowledge: Doing PhDs in the new humanities. Australian Universities’ Review 38(2). 35–39.Google Scholar
Hood, Susan
2010 Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Guangwei & Guihua Wang
2014 Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 141. 14–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
1993 Professional conflict: Disagreement in academic discourse. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology, 115–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson
(eds.) 2000 Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 20(3). 341–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2017 Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics 1131. 16–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse
2004 Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Feng & Ken Hyland
2016 Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics. 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Renu, Jason Miin-Hwa Lim & Nor Arifah Mohd Nor
2014 Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Social and Behavioral Sciences 1341. 53–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, Budsaba
2005 Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3). 269–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Civil engineering research article introductions: Textual structure and linguistic characterisation. Asian ESP Journal 7(2). 55–84.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987 Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, Zak
2014 Exploring valued patterns of stance in upper-level student writing in the disciplines. Written Communication 31(1). 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno & Woolgar Steve
1979 Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude
1963 Structural anthropology, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
1976 Structural anthropology, Vol. 21. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
1984 Structure and form: Reflections on a work by Vladimir Propp. In Vladimir Propp, Theory and history of folklore, 167–88. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, Beverly, Jonathan Fine & Lynne Young
2001 Expository discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lim, Jason Miin-Hwa
2012 How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(3). 229–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorés, Rosa
2004 On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes 23(3). 280–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyda, Andrzej & Krystyna Warchał
2014 Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mansourizadeh, Kobra & Ummul K. Ahmad
2011 Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3). 152–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
2000 Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003 Introduction. Text 23(2). 171–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005 Language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Marina Bondi
2003 Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 269–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milagros del Saz Rubio, María
2011 A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes 30(4). 258–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moghaddasi, Shahin & Heather A. B. Graves
2017 ‘Since Hadwiger’s conjection … is still open’: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes 451. 69–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwogu, Kevin N.
1997 The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 201. 28–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
2008 UAM corpus tool. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Retrieved from [URL]
Ozturk, Ismet
2007 The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes 26(1). 25–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
1986 Mood and modality. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian
1994 Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries. Applied Linguistics 15(3). 288–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes 21(2). 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Michael
1983 Modal expressions in English. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir
1968 The morphology of the folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team
2013 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from [URL]
Samraj, Betty
2002 Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21(1). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(4). 299–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b On the function of stance-neutral formulations: Apparent neutrality as a powerful stance constructing resource. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 161. 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Analysing structure in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silver, Marc & Marina Bondi
2004 Weaving voices: A study of article openings in historical discourse. In Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti & Elena Tognini Bonelli (eds.), Academic discourse: New insights into evaluation, 141–160. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Stoller, Fredricka L. & Marin S. Robinson
2013 Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes 32(1). 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M.
1990 Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2004 Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. & Christine Feak
2012 Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sarah & Thomas P. Hawes
1994 Reporting verbs in medical journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 13(2). 129–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2001 Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics 22(1), 58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Yiyun Ye
1991 Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 12(4). 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Jianglin Zhou
2000 Evaluation and organization in text: The structuring role of evaluative disjuncts. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 121–141.Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2012 Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media 1(2–3). 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sawaki, Tomoko
2023. High use of direct questions and relative absence of promotional intention in Japanese peer-reviewed research article introductions compared to their English counterparts. English for Specific Purposes 69 ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.