Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 27:3 (2020) ► pp. 247279
References

References

Castrén, M. Alexander
1854Grammatik der samojedischen Sprachen. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Conti, Carmen
2008Receptores y beneficiarios: Estudio tipológico de la ditransitividad. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
1979Les constructions dites “possessives”: Etude de linguistique générale et de typologie linguistique. Paris: Université Paris 4.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis & Michael Daniel
2006Monotransitivity in ‘give’-constructions: Exploring the periphery of ditransitives. Paper presented at the ‘Rara and Rarissima’ Conference in Leipzig.
Du Bois, John W.
1987The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63. 805–855. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby
2003Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (Studies in discourse and grammar 14). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enç, Mürvet
1991The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22(1). 1–25.Google Scholar
Gerland, Doris
2014Definitely not possessed? Possessive suffixes with definiteness marking Function. In Thomas Gamerschlag, Doris Gerland, Rainer Osswald & Wiebke Petersen (eds.), Frames and concept types: Applications in language and philosophy (Studies in linguistics and philosophy 94), 269–292. New York, NY: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1984Syntax: A functional-typological introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2015Ditransitive constructions. Annual Review of Linguistics 1. 19–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helimski, Eugen A.
1994Očerk morfonologii i slovoizmenitel’noj morfologii nganasanskogo jazyka [A sketch of Nganasan morphophonology and inflectional morphology]. In Eugen A. Helimski (ed.), Tajmyrskij ètnolingvističeskij sbornik [Tajmyr ethnolinguistic paper collection], Vol. 1: Materialy po nganasanskomu šamanstvu i jazyku [Data on Nganasan shamanism and language], 190–221. Moscow: Russian State University for Humanities.Google Scholar
Helimski, Eugen
1998Nganasan. In Daniel Abondolo (ed.), The Uralic languages, 480–515. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manuscript. Materialy k slovarju èneckogo jazyka [Materials for an Enets dictionary]. Available online at http://​www​.uni​-hamburg​.de​/ifuu​/Arbeiten_​/Helimski​-Enzisch​.zip
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2004Polysemy in Basque locational cases. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 18. 271–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, Georgette
1977Specificity and the interpretation of quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 233–245.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
1989Samojedin predestinatiivisen deklinaation alkuperästä. Suomalais Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja 82. 298–201.Google Scholar
Kazama, Shinjiro
2012Designative case in Tungusic languages. In Andrej L. Malchukov & Lindsay J. Whaley (eds.), Recent advances in Tungusic linguistics, 123–154. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Khanina, Olesya & Andrey Shluinsky
2013Jadernye padeži suščestvitel’nyx v èneckom jazyke: V poiskax adekvatnogo opisanija [Core cases in Enets: a search for an appropriate description]. In Tatiana Agranat, Olga Kazakevič & Egor Kashkin (eds.), Lingvističeskij bespredel 2. Festschrift for Ariadna Kuznecova, 76–94. Moscow: Izdatel̘’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
2014A rare type of benefactive construction: Evidence from Enets. Linguistics 52(6). 1391–1431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Prjamoj ob”ekt v èneckom jazyke: Ob”ektnoe soglasovanie glagola [Direct object in Enets: Object cross-reference on a verb]. In Ekaterina Lyutikova, Anton Zimmerling & Maria Konoshenko (eds.), Tipologija morfosintaksičeskix parametrov, Vyp. 2 [Typology of morphosyntactic parameters, Vol. 2], 392–410. Moscow: MPGU.Google Scholar
2017Enets object cross-reference: Syntactic marking of information structure. Paper presented at Syntax of Uralic languages (SOUL) 2017, Budapest, June 27–28.
Künnap, Ago Ju.
1974Sklonenie i sprjaženie v samodijskix jazykax [Declension and conjugation in Samoyedic languages]. Tartu: University of Tartu Habilitation thesis.Google Scholar
Künnap, Ago
2004About the non-personal definite function of the Uralic 3rd person possessive suffix. Linguistica Uralica 40(1). 1–4.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leisiö, Larisa
2014Imennye kategorii vremeni v nganasanskom i drugix severnosamodijskix jazykax [The categories of nominal tense in Nganasan and other Northern Samoyedic languages]. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1. 39–59.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2018Typological remarks on “internal” beneficiaries and the benefactive-possessive convergence. In Agnes Korn & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Ditransitive constructions in a typological perspective, 13–25. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie
2010Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In Andrej Malchukov, Martin Haspelmath & Bernard Comrie (eds.), Studies in ditransitive constructions, 1–64. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna & Peter Austin
2007Three-participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology. Linguistics 45(3). 393–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mikola, Tibor
2004Studien zur Geschichte der samojedischen Sprachen. Szeged: SzTE Finnisch-Ugrisches Institut.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Galina A. Otaina
2013A syntax of the Nivkh language: The Amur dialect. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
2003Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, 130–145. Iževsk & Leipzig: Udmurt State University; Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
2009Nominal tense in Tundra Nenets and Northern Samoyedic. In Peter Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of the conference on language documentation and linguistic theory 2, 241–250. SOAS: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project and Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2014A grammar of Tundra Nenets. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015On the expression of TAM on nouns: Evidence from Tundra Nenets. Lingua 166. 99–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, Christoph
2006Articles and article systems in some areas of Europe. In Guiliano Bernini & Marcia Schwartz (eds.), Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe, 545–615. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegl, Florian
2013Materials on Forest Enets, an indigenous language of Northern Siberia. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
2015The structure of noun phrases with referential PX.2P in Northern Samoyedic. Tomsk Journal for Linguistics and Anthropology 1(7). 21–31.Google Scholar
Sorokina, Irina P.
2010Èneckij jazyk [Enets]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Sorokina, Irina P. & Dar’ja S. Bolina
2005Èneckie teksty [Enets texts]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tereščenko, Natal’ja M.
1966Èneckij jazyk [Enets]. In Vasilij E. Lytkin & Klara E. Majtinskaja (eds.), Jazyki narodov SSSR: Finno-ugorskie i samodijskie yazyki [Languages of the USSR: Fenno-Ugric and Samoyedic languages], 438–457. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
1977K genezisu lično-prednaznačitel’nyx (deziderativnyx) form severnosamodijskix jazykov [On the genesis of the destinative (desiderative) forms of the Northern Samoyedic languages]. Fenno-Ugristica 4. 95–105.Google Scholar