Presupposed evaluation in environmental argumentative discourse
Expressions of evaluation in discourse have been studied from a number of different perspectives, all highlighting
the fact that evaluation may be expressed cumulatively, through a combination of different linguistic means, and pragmatically, at
various levels of implicitness, which often defy precise categorization. This paper argues that, in argumentative discourse, the
pragmatics of evaluation includes not only implied but also presupposed aspects. A case study centred on the
environmental debate over the contested practice of fracking is used to identify the evaluative premises that lie
behind the main stances or claims on the issue, as expressed by different stakeholders. It is
argued that this wider approach to the analysis of evaluation may be particularly suited to uncover the evaluative premises that
lie at the core of different and often contradictory environmental positions and policies.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Evaluation in discourse
- 3.Evaluation, register and argumentation
- 4.Evaluation in environmental argumentation: A case study
- 4.1Analysis of viewpoints
- 4.2Summary of analysis and findings
- 5.Discussion
- 5.1Theoretical implications and further research
- 5.2Environmental deliberation
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Notes
-
References
References (33)
BBC News
5 January 2013 Viewpoints: fracking’s risks and benefits Available online at
[URL]
Bednarek, Monika
2006 Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.
Bednarek, Monika
2008 Emotion talk across corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Benamara, Farah, Maite Taboada & Yannick Mathieu
2017 Evaluative language beyond bags of words: Linguistic insights and computational applications.
Computational Linguistics 43(1). 201–264.
Colomina-Almiñana, Juan J.
2018 Pragmatic presuppositions and articulated constituents.
Lingua 2061. 112–126.
Davies, Anna R.
2006 Nature in place: Public visions of nature-society relationships in the UK. In
J. G. Riyan,
Rob Van den Born,
H. J. Lenders &
Wouter T. de Groot (eds.),
Visions of nature, 85–106. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
Eemeren, Frans H. van & Rob Grootendorst
2003 A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: CUP.
Gerritsen, Susanne
2001 Unexpressed premises. In
Frans H. van Eemeren (ed.),
Crucial concepts in argumentation theory, 51–79. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Johnson, Ralph H. & Blair J. Anthony
2006 Logical self-defence. New York, NY: International Debate Education Association.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
Hommerberg, Charlotte
2015 Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis.
Text and Talk 35(2). 155–175.
Hommerberg, Charlotte & Alexanne, Don
Hood, Susan & J. R. Martin
2007 Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In
Ruqaiya Hasan,
Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen &
Jonathan Webster (eds.),
Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, vol. 21, 739–764. London: Equinox.
Hunston, Susan
1989 Evaluation in experimental research articles. Birmingham: University of Birmingham PhD thesis.
Hunston, Susan
2000 Evaluation and the planes of discourse: Status and value in persuasive texts. In
Susan Hunston &
Geoff Thompson (eds.), 176–206.
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson
(eds.) 2000 Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
Hyland, Ken
2002 What do they mean? Questions in academic writing.
Text 22(4). 259–557.
Labov, William & Joshua Valetzky
1967 Narrative analysis. In
June Helm (ed.),
Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Kaltenbacher, Martin
2006 Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive andthe factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of appraisal. In
Geoff Thompson &
Susan Hunston (eds.),
System and corpus: Exploring connections, 269–292. London: Equinox.
Macken-Horarik, Mary & Anne Isaac
2014 Appraising appraisal. In
Geoff Thompson &
Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 67–92.
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pounds, Gabrina
2011 “This property offers much character and charm”: Evaluation in the discourse of online property advertising.
Text and Talk 31(2). 195–220.
Thompson, Geoff
2014 Affect and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: Refining the Appraisal model. In
Geoff Thompson &
Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 47–66.
Thompson, Geoff & Laura Alba-Juez
Toulmin, Stephen E., Richard Rieke & Allan S. Janik
1979 An introduction to reasoning. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Toulmin, Stephen E.
2003 The uses of argument. Cambridge: CUP.
Vargas, Andrès, Michael Howes & Nicholas Rohde
2017 The problem of inclusion in deliberative environmental evaluation.
Environmental values 261. 157–176.
Walton, Douglas
2009 Argumentation theory: A very short introduction. In
Guillermo Simari &
Iyad Rahwan (eds.),
Argumentation in artificial intelligence, 1–22. Berlin: Springer.
Wilson, Matthew A. & Richard B. Howarth
2002 Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation.
Ecological Economics 11. 431–443.
Wu, Siew Mei & Allison Desmond
2005 Evaluative expressions in analytical arguments: Aspects of appraisal in assigned English language essays.
Journal of Applied Linguistics 2(1). 105–127.
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Jin, Xiaoling
2024.
Appraisal analysis of the vague expressions in academic lectures using English as an academic lingua franca in an EMI university.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.