Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 30:3 (2023) ► pp.255286
References (67)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ament, Jennifer R. & Julia Barón Parés. 2017. The acquisition of discourse markers in the English-medium instruction context. In Carmen Pérez Vidal, Sonia López-Serrano, Jennifer Ament & Dakota J. Thomas-Wilhelm (eds.), Learning context effects: Study abroad, formal instruction and international immersion classrooms, 43–74. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Gisle. 1997. They like wanna see like how we talk and all that. The use of like as a discourse marker in London teenage speech. In Magnus Ljung (ed.), Corpus-based studies in English, 37–48. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 1998. The pragmatic marker like from a relevance-theoretic perspective. In Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), 147–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The role of the pragmatic marker like in utterance interpretation. In Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds.), Pragmatic markers and propositional attitude, 17–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2016. Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2001. An alternative view of like: Its grammaticalisation in conversational American English and beyond. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 111. 21–41.Google Scholar
CHILDES Project. 2000. CHILDES data base manuals. North American English Corpora. url: [URL] (accessed December 8th, 2019).
Clark, Eve V. 2010. Adult offer, word-class, and child uptake in early lexical acquisition. First Language 30(3–4). 250–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Pragmatics in acquisition. Journal of Child Language 41(1). 105–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 201. 37–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, Jenny & Amy Kyratzis. 2015. Child discourse. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 681–704. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer. 2000. The sociolinguistic distribution of and attitudes toward focuser like and quotative like . Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(1). 60–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diskin, Chloe. 2017. The use of the discourse-pragmatic marker ‘like’ by native and non-native speakers of English in Ireland. Journal of Pragmatics 1201. 144–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra F. 2005. Like: Syntax and development. Toronto: University of Toronto PhD thesis.
2007. Like and language ideology: Disentangling fact from fiction. American Speech 82(4). 386–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2017. Discourse-pragmatic variation in context: Eight hundred years of like . Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1999. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Gerald Docherty & Dominic Watt. 1999. Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation in 2 to 4 year olds. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 71. 1–25.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1990. An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14(3). 383–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Contrastive discourse markers in English. In Andreas Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds.), 301–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311. 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Janet M. 2003. Use of the discourse marker like in interviews. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3). 365–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Furkó, Péter B. 2019. Discourse markers and beyond: Descriptive and critical perspectives on discourse-pragmatic devices across genres and languages. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten & Achim Zeileis. 2015. Partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 161. 3905–3909.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2014. Construction Grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hölker, Klaus. 1991. Französisch: Partikelforschung. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik 4(1). 77–88.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas & Yael Ziv (eds.). 1998. Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khoshgoftaar, Taghi M. & Edward B. Allen. 2001. Controlling overfitting in classification-tree models of software quality. Empirical Software Engineering 61. 59–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kursa, Miron B. & Witold R. Rudnicki. 2010. Feature selection with the Boruta package. Journal of Statistical Software 36(11). 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1964. Stages in the acquisition of Standard English. In Roger Shuy (ed.), Social dialects and language learning, 77–103. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
. 1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2, Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2010. Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 3, Cognitive and Cultural Factors. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levey, Stephen. 2006. The sociolinguistic distribution of discourse marker like in preadolescent speech. Multilingua—Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 25(4). 413–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Light, Richard J. 1971. Measures of response agreement for qualitative data: Some generalizations and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin 761. 365–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project: The database, vol. 2. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Maschler, Yael. 1994. Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 231. 325–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Deborah Schiffrin. 2015. Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 189–221. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Danielle. 2014. Pragmatic development in first language acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meehan, Teresa. 1991. It’s like, ʻwhat’s happening in the evolution of like?ʼ: A theory of grammaticalization. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 161. 37–51.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim. 2009. Like and other discourse markers. In Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and beyond, 317–338. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1995. The function of like in dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 23 (4). 365–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Simone. 2005. Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odato, Chris V. 2010. Children’s development of knowledge and beliefs about English like(s). Michigan: University of Michigan PhD thesis.
2013. The development of children’s use of discourse LIKE in peer interaction. American Speech 88(2). 117–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. 2018. Pragmatic development. Language Learning and Development 14(3). 167–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partridge, Eric. 1984. A Dictionary of slang and unconventional English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Polat, Brittany. 2011. Investigating acquisition of discourse markers through a developmental learner corpus. Journal of Pragmatics 43(15). 3745–3756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranger, Graham. 2018. Discourse markers: An enunciative approach. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julia L. 2018. Child language variation. In Jack K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 263–276. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julia & William Labov. 1995. Learning to talk Philadelphian: Acquisition of short a by preschool children. Language Variation and Change 7(1). 101–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne & Deborah Lange. 1991. The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66(3). 227–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schourup, Lawrence C. 1985. Common discourse particles in English conversations “like”, “well”, “y’know”. New York & London: Garland.Google Scholar
Schweinberger, Martin. 2013. A sociolinguistics analysis of discourse marker like in Northern Ireland. A look behind the scenes of quantitative reasoning. In Markus Bieswanger & A. Koll-Stobbe (eds.), New Approaches to the Analysis of Linguistic Variability, 13–39. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2014. The discourse marker LIKE: A corpus-based analysis of selected varieties of English. Hamburg: University of Hamburg PhD thesis.
. 2015. A comparative study of the pragmatic marker like in Irish English and in south-eastern varieties of British English. In Carolina P. Amador-Moreno, Kevin McCafferty & Elaine Vaughan (eds.), Pragmatic markers in Irish English, 114–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2020. Speech-unit final like in Irish English. English World Wide 41(1). 89–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Muffy E. A. 2002. Like: The discourse particle and semantics. Journal of Semantics 19(1). 35–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2005. So who? like how? just what?: Discourse markers in the conversations of young Canadians. Journal of Pragmatics 37(11). 1896–1915. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. H. Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, Robert. 1988. Like is, like, focus. American Speech 63(3). 234–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar