Another turn of the screw on the history of the reaction object construction
Tamara Bouso | Universitat de les Illes Balears
Pablo Ruano San Segundo | Universidad de Extremadura
This article deals with the Reaction Object Construction (ROC), as in She smiled disbelief, where
an intransitive verb (smile), by adding an emotional object (disbelief), acquires the extended
sense “express X by V−ing” (i.e. “She expressed disbelief by smiling”). Earlier research has suggested a diachronic connection
between the ROC and Direct Discourse Constructions (DDCs) of the type She smiled, “I don’t believe you” (Visser 1963–1973). More recently, Bouso (2018)
has shown that the ROC is primarily a feature of 19th century narrative fiction. This paper aims to bring together these insights.
On the basis of a self-compiled corpus and De Smet’s Corpus of English Novels, it investigates the productivity
of the ROC in 19th and 20th century fiction, and the role of DDCs in its development. The results reveal a peak in the
productivity of the ROC that coincides with the development of the sentimental novel, and a correlation between the development of
the ROC on the one hand and of those DDCs that have been mistakenly hypothesised to be its single source constructions on the
other. Extravagance is proposed as a triggering factor for the use of the ROC in the 19th century as an alternative to DDCs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.State of the art
- 2.1Characterisation and history of the ROC
- 2.2The function of the ROC
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Results and discussion
- 4.1Relation between the ROC and the sentimental novel
- 4.2The role of DDCs in the development of the ROC
- 5.Concluding remarks and future research
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 07 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20026.bou
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20026.bou
References
Baayen, Harald
Baayen, Harald & Rochelle Lieber
Barðdal, Jóhanna
Bouso, Tamara
2014 On
the nonprototypical status of reaction objects and other nonsubcategorized
objects. In Esther Álvarez López, Emilia María Durán Almarza & Alicia Menéndez Tarrazo (eds.), Building
interdisciplinary knowledge. Approaches to English and American studies in
Spain, 307–314. Oviedo: AEDEAN & KRK Ediciones.
Busse, Beatrix
Caldas-Coulthard, Carmen Rosa
Carter, Ronald & John McRae
De Smet, Hendrik, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Jukka Tyrkkö
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor
Gelderen, Elly van
Goldberg, Adele E.
Gries, Stefan Th. & Anatol Stefanowitsch
Gries, Stefan Th
Hart, Hilary
Hilpert, Martin
Hilpert, Martin & Susanne Flach
Forthcoming. A
case of constructional contamination in English: Modified noun phrases influence adverb placement in the
passive. In Marcin Grygiel ed. Contrast
and analogy in language: Perspectives from Cognitive
Linguistics Amsterdam Benjamins
Höche, Silke
Huddleston, Rodney, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Laurie Bauer, Betty Birner, Ted Briscoe, Peter Collins, David Denison, David Lee, Anita Mittwoch, Geoffrey Nunberg, Frank Palmer, John Payne, Peter Peterson, Lesley Stirling & Gregory Ward
Hunt, Leigh, Laurence Sterne, John Hawkesworth, Jean-François Marmontel, Samuel Johnson, Voltaire, Henry Brooke, Oliver Goldsmith & Henry Mackenzie
Lakoff, George
Levin, Beth
Mahlberg, Michaela, Viola Wiegand, Peter Stockwell & Anthony Hennessey
Martínez-Vázquez, Montserrat
McHale, Brian
McIntyre, Dan & Brian Walker
Israel, Michael
Noël, Dirk
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
Pijpops, Dirk & Freek Van de Velde
Piper, Andrew & Richard Jean So
2015 Quantifying
the weepy bestseller: Are commercial novels really more sentimental than literary fiction? The
New Republic. Accessed October 3,
2020. Available online at newrepublic.com/article/126123/quantifying-weepy-bestseller
R Core Team
Rowland, Ann Wierda
Ruano San Segundo, Pablo
Ruano San Segundo, Pablo & Tamara Bouso
Samuels, Shirley
Semino, Elena & Mick Short
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries
Thompson, Geoff
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale