Cover not available
Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 29:2 (2022) ► pp.143–168

From dynamic modal to conditional protasis connective

Evidence from Chinese néng ‘be able to’

ORCID logo | University of Edinburgh
The grammaticalization literature has not demonstrated convincingly how, if at all, dynamic modals may develop into conditional protasis connectives. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative evidence from Chinese, this paper hypothesizes that such a directionality may arise through univerbation between dynamic modals and protasis connectives (e.g. ruò ‘if’ + néng ‘be able to’ > ruònéng ‘if’). Furthermore, this paper suggests that functional compatibility in terms of performativity may explain why dynamic modals tend to grammaticalize into connectives in pre-established conditional protases, while deontic and epistemic modals do so in main clauses.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The classification of modality, modal > protasis connective and Chinese modals and protasis connectives
    • 2.1The classification of modality
    • 2.2 modal > protasis connective
    • 2.3 dynamic > protasis connective
    • 2.4Modal auxiliaries and protasis connectives under examination
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.The main hypothesis
    • 4.1Quantitative evidence
    • 4.2Qualitative evidence
    • 4.3On the rarity of if-néng as a protasis connective
  • 5.Developmental difference between dynamic, deontic and epistemic modals
    • 5.1Clauses types in modal > protasis connective
    • 5.2(In)compatibilities between modals and protases
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20030.kuo
References (59)
References
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.Google Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne. 2019. Should a conditional marker arise … The diachronic development of conditional sollte in German. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breitbarth, Anne, Sara Delva & Torsten Leuschner. 2016. A (very) imperfect sandwich: English should, German sollte, Dutch mocht/moest as grammaticalizing markers of conditionality. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28(4). 282–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Byloo, Pieter & Jan Nuyts. 2014. Meaning change in the Dutch core modals: (Inter)subjectification in a grammatical paradigm. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46(1). 85–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Li-Li. 2009. From restrictive adverbs to sufficient conditional conjunctions. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 39(3). 355–388.Google Scholar
Chang, Miao-Hsia. 1996. The grammaticalization of BEH in Taiwanese Hokkien. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1/2). 39–59. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
. 2009. Metaphorization and metonymization: the development of verbs of volition in Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 7(1). 53–84.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hilary & Alain Peyraube. 2016. Modality and mood in Sinitic. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 296–329. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit. 2002. Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 211. 151–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 103–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Guo, Jianshen. 1995. The interactional basis of the Mandarin modal negn ‘can’. In Joan Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 205–238. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 251. 127–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz. 2017. A functional perspective on the grammaticalization of tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality. In Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds.), The grammaticalization of tense, aspect and evidentiality: A functional perspective, 1–12. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2010. What can synchronic gradience tell us about reanalysis? Verb-first conditionals in written German and Swedish. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradualness, gradience, and grammaticalization, 181–201. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Hsun-Ming, Yu-Fang Wang & Kai-Ming Hu. 2015. Direct and indirect conditionals: A corpus-based study of Chinese yaoshi and yaobushi in spoken and written discourse. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics. 13(2). 31–77.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shaoyu. 2013. Cíyì yǎnbiàn sān lì ‘Three examples of semantic change’. In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese Linguistics and beyond, vol. 11, 321–344. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuo, Yueh Hsin. 2020. Late-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
. Forthcoming a. From deontic modality to conditionality: A diachronic investigation into bì in Classical Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22(2).
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Ming. 2016. Hanyu Zhudongci De Lishi Yanbian Yanjiu ‘A study of historical development of Chinese Auxiliary Verbs’. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Antwerp: University of Antwerp PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Liu, Cheng-Hui. 2010. On the functions of the protasis markers gou, rou, and shi in Pre-Qin Chinese. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 40(2). 221–244.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, vol. 21. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ma, Beijia. 2002. ‘Yao’ de yufahua ‘the grammaticalization of yao ’. Linguistics Study 41. 81–87.Google Scholar
. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan. 1993. Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure. Linguistics 311. 933–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ōta, Tatsuo. 1958. Chugokugo rekishi bunpō ‘A historical grammar of modern Chinese’. Tokyo: Kōnan Shoin.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Peyraube, Alain & Li Ming. 2012. The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. In Janet Zhiqun Xing (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–167. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rychlý, Pavel. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. Workshop on recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing (RASLAN) 21. 6–9.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Stefan Th. Gries. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2). 209–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. The annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 141. 389–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1985. Conditional markers. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 289–307. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tsang, Chui Lim. 1981. A semantic study of modal auxiliary verbs in Chinese. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Van den Nest, Daan. 2010. Should conditionals be emergent… Asyndetic subordination in German and English as a challenge to grammaticalization research. In An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete, Kristin Davidse & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), Formal evidence in grammaticalization research, 95–136. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33(10). 1505–1528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Walter Bisang. 2004. What makes grammaticalization? An appraisal of its components and its fringes. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? – A look from its fringes and its components, 3–20. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wu, Hsueh-ju. 2018. A study of modal verbs in Pre-Qin Chinese. Shanghai: Zhongxi Shuju.Google Scholar
Yu, Hsueh-ying. 1998. Some speculations on the semantic change of Chinese modal verb ‘Yao’. Wenshan Review 1(2). 161–175.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. Bidirectionality between modal and conditional constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Diachronica 39:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2022. From deontic modality to conditionality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 23:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
KUO, YUEH HSIN
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.