The grammaticalization literature has not demonstrated convincingly how, if at all, dynamic modals may develop into conditional protasis connectives. Drawing on qualitative and quantitative evidence from Chinese, this paper hypothesizes that such a directionality may arise through univerbation between dynamic modals and protasis connectives (e.g. ruò ‘if’ + néng ‘be able to’ > ruònéng ‘if’). Furthermore, this paper suggests that functional compatibility in terms of performativity may explain why dynamic modals tend to grammaticalize into connectives in pre-established conditional protases, while deontic and epistemic modals do so in main clauses.
Article outline
1.Introduction
2.The classification of modality, modal > protasis connective and Chinese modals and protasis connectives
2.1The classification of modality
2.2modal > protasis connective
2.3dynamic > protasis connective
2.4Modal auxiliaries and protasis connectives under examination
3.Data and methodology
4.The main hypothesis
4.1Quantitative evidence
4.2Qualitative evidence
4.3On the rarity of if-néng as a protasis connective
5.Developmental difference between dynamic, deontic and epistemic modals
5.1Clauses types in modal > protasis connective
5.2(In)compatibilities between modals and protases
Auwera, Johan van der & Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2(1). 79–124.
Breitbarth, Anne. 2019. Should a conditional marker arise … The diachronic development of conditional sollte in German. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 21.
Breitbarth, Anne, Sara Delva & Torsten Leuschner. 2016. A (very) imperfect sandwich: English should, German sollte, Dutch mocht/moest as grammaticalizing markers of conditionality. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 28(4). 282–316.
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Bybee, Joan & William Pagliuca. 1987. The evolution of future meaning. In Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba & Giuliano Bernini (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, 109–122. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Byloo, Pieter & Jan Nuyts. 2014. Meaning change in the Dutch core modals: (Inter)subjectification in a grammatical paradigm. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46(1). 85–116.
Chang, Li-Li. 2009. From restrictive adverbs to sufficient conditional conjunctions. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 39(3). 355–388.
Chang, Miao-Hsia. 1996. The grammaticalization of BEH in Taiwanese Hokkien. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 26(1/2). 39–59. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.
Chang, Miao-Hsia. 2009. Metaphorization and metonymization: the development of verbs of volition in Southern Min. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 7(1). 53–84.
Chappell, Hilary & Alain Peyraube. 2016. Modality and mood in Sinitic. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 296–329. Oxford: OUP.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: OUP.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction. Cambridge: CUP.
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: CUP.
Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton.
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit. 2002. Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 211. 151–195.
Dik, Simon. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton.
Goldberg, Adele. 2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hengeveld, Kees. 1989. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 251. 127–157.
Hengeveld, Kees, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz. 2017. A functional perspective on the grammaticalization of tense, aspect, modality, and evidentiality. In Kees Hengeveld, Heiko Narrog & Hella Olbertz (eds.), The grammaticalization of tense, aspect and evidentiality: A functional perspective, 1–12. Berlin: Mouton.
Hsu, Hsun-Ming, Yu-Fang Wang & Kai-Ming Hu. 2015. Direct and indirect conditionals: A corpus-based study of Chinese yaoshi and yaobushi in spoken and written discourse. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics. 13(2). 31–77.
Jiang, Shaoyu. 2013. Cíyì yǎnbiàn sān lì ‘Three examples of semantic change’. In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redouane Djamouri & Thekla Wiebusch (eds.), Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese Linguistics and beyond, vol. 11, 321–344. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: OUP.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee. 2019. World lexicon of grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Kuo, Yueh Hsin. 2020. Late-stage grammatical change in Chinese: A constructional account. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh PhD Thesis.
Kuo, Yueh Hsin. Forthcoming a. From deontic modality to conditionality: A diachronic investigation into bì in Classical Chinese. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22(2).
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Li, Ming. 2016. Hanyu Zhudongci De Lishi Yanbian Yanjiu ‘A study of historical development of Chinese Auxiliary Verbs’. Beijing: Commercial Press.
Li, Renzhi. 2004. Modality in English and Chinese: A typological perspective. Antwerp: University of Antwerp PhD thesis.
Liu, Cheng-Hui. 2010. On the functions of the protasis markers gou, rou, and shi in Pre-Qin Chinese. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 40(2). 221–244.
Narrog, Heiko. 2012. Modality, subjectivity, and semantic change: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Nuyts, Jan. 1993. Epistemic modal adverbs and adjectives and the layered representation of conceptual and linguistic structure. Linguistics 311. 933–69.
Ōta, Tatsuo. 1958. Chugokugo rekishi bunpō ‘A historical grammar of modern Chinese’. Tokyo: Kōnan Shoin.
Palmer, Frank R.1990. Modality and the English modals, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Longman.
Peyraube, Alain & Li Ming. 2012. The semantic historical development of modal verbs of volition in Chinese. In Janet Zhiqun Xing (ed.), Newest trends in the study of grammaticalization and lexicalization in Chinese, 149–167. Berlin: Mouton.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Rychlý, Pavel. 2008. A lexicographer-friendly association score. Workshop on recent advances in Slavonic natural language processing (RASLAN) 21. 6–9.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2020. The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: OUP.
Van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: CUP.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33(10). 1505–1528.
Wiemer, Björn & Walter Bisang. 2004. What makes grammaticalization? An appraisal of its components and its fringes. In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? – A look from its fringes and its components, 3–20. Berlin: Mouton.
Wu, Hsueh-ju. 2018. A study of modal verbs in Pre-Qin Chinese. Shanghai: Zhongxi Shuju.
Yu, Hsueh-ying. 1998. Some speculations on the semantic change of Chinese modal verb ‘Yao’. Wenshan Review 1(2). 161–175.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Kuo, Yueh Hsin
2021. Morphosyntactic vagueness and directionality. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 9:1 ► pp. 95 ff.
2024. Bidirectional grammaticalization: Chinese modal and conditional. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 363 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.