Article published In:
Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theoretical developments and directions
Edited by Wendy L. Bowcher and Tom Bartlett
[Functions of Language 28:3] 2021
► pp. 342367
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1984Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (Caryl Emerson, ed. and transl.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bargh, John A. & Katelyn Y. A. McKenna
2004The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology 551. 573–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L.
1999Investigating institutionalization in context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 141–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Field and multimodal texts. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language (Volume 21), 619–646. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2014Issues in developing unified systems for contextual field and mode. Functions of Language 21 (2). 176–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics 5(5). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, David
2004Parameters of context: On establishing the similarities and differences between social processes. Sydney: Macquarie University unpublished mimeo.Google Scholar
Butt, David G., Alison R. Moore & John R. Cartmill
2016Transactions between matter and meaning: Surgical contexts and symbolic action. In Sarah J. White & John Cartmill (eds.), Communication in surgical practice, 181–206. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hong
2019Freedom and carnival: Cultural dissemination strategies of Danmaku videos: A case of [in Chinese]. Today’s Mass Media 21. 136–138.Google Scholar
Cloran, C.
1999Context, material situation and text. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 177–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collot, Milena & Nancy Belmore
1996Electronic language: a new variety of English. In Susan C. Herring (ed.), 13–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derks, Daantje, Agneta H. Fischer & Arjan E. R. Bos
2008The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior 24(3). 766–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djonov, Emilia & Theo van Leeuwen
2018Social media as semiotic technology and social practice: The case of Research Gate’s design and its potential to transform social practice. Social Semiotics 28 (5). 641–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John Rupert
1950Personality and language in society. Sociological Review 421. 37–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenlauer, Volker
2017Social network sites/Facebook. In Christian Hoffmann & Wolfram Bublitz (eds.), Pragmatics of social media, 225–242. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghadessy, Mohsen
(ed.) 1999Text and context in Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974Frame analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1989Spoken and written language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1994An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1981What’s going on: A dynamic view of context in language. In James E. Copeland & Philip E. Davis (eds.), The seventh LACUS Forum, 106–121. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1985Part B. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–118.Google Scholar
1994Situation and the definition of genres. In Allen Grimshaw (ed.), What’s going on here? Complementary studies of professional talk, 127–172. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1999Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 219–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The place of context in a systemic functional model. In M. A. K. Halliday & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 166–189. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2014Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics 1 (9). 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Computer-mediated discourse. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 612–634. Maldenn: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society 6 (1). 26–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, David
2007Interpreting instant messaging: Context and meaning in Computer-mediated Communication. Journal of Anthropological Research 63(3). 359–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Daniel
2013Polyphonic/pseudo-synchronic: Animated writing in the comment feed of Nicovideo. Japanese Studies 33(3). 297–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2004The problem of context in computer-mediated communication. In Philip LeVine & Ron Scollon (eds.), Discourse and technology: Multimodal discourse analysis, 20–33. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2015Discourse, cybernetics and the entextualization of the self. In Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik & Christopher A. Hafner (eds.), 28–47.Google Scholar
Jones, Rodney H., Alice Chik & Christopher A. Hafner
2015aIntroduction: Discourse analysis and digital practices. In Rodney H. Jones, Alice Chik & Christopher A. Hafner (eds.), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2015bDiscourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, Danica & Theo Van Leeuwen
2018Multimodal dialogue on social media. Social Semiotics 28 (5). 683–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay
1995Textual politics: Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Li, Jinying
2017The Interface affect of a contact zone: Danmaku on video-streaming platforms. Asiascape: Digital Asia 4(3). 233–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ma, Xiaojuan & Nan Cao
2017Video-based evanescent, anonymous, asynchronous social interaction: Motivation and adaption to medium. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 770–782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923Supplement 1: The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Charles Kay Ogden & Ivor Armstrong Richards (eds.), The meaning of meaning, 296–336. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Murray, Denise E.
1988The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching. Language in Society 171. 351–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Protean communication: The language of Computer-Mediated Communication. TESOL Quarterly 34(3). 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, Søren Vigild & Gunhild Kvåle
2018Studying social media as semiotic technology: a social semiotic multimodal framework. Social Semiotics 28(5). 700–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, Søren Vigild, Gunhild Kvåle, & Theo van Leeuwen
2018Social media as semiotic technology. Social Semiotics 28 (5). 593–600. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Claire Emily
2011Exploring diachronic register change in reports of armistice 1902–2003. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(3). 241–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Yang, Li Shuchen, Ye Xiaoxiao & He Fangping
2010Content mining and network analysis of Microblog spam. Journal of Convergence Information Technology 5(1). 135–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shortis, T.
2007Gr8 txtpectations: The creativity of text spelling. English, Drama. Media 81. 21–26.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
2013The medium is the metamessage. In Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media, 99–117. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin
2006From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(3): 667–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Determined creativity: Language play in new media. In Rodney Jones (ed.), Discourse and creativity, 169–190. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin, Laura Lengel & Alice Tomic
2004Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo & Kaarlo Miller
1988We-Intentions. Philosophical studies: An international Journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition 5(3). 367–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waseleski, Carol
2006Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted to two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 111. 1012–1024. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Qunfang, Sang Yisi, Zhang Shan & Huang Yun
2018Danmaku vs. forum comments: Understanding user participation and knowledge sharing in online videos. In Andrea Forte, Michael Prilla & Adriana Vivacqua (eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork, 209–218. New York: AMC. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y.
2020The danmaku interface on Bilibili and the decontextualized translation practice: A semiotic technology perspective. Social Semiotics 30(2). 254–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, Simenon J.
Zappavigna, Michele
2015Searchable talk: the linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics 25(3). 274–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Leticia-Tian & Daniel Cassany
2020Making sense of danmu: Coherence in massive anonymous chats on Discourse Studies 22(4). 483–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Yi
2020Adopting Japanese in a popular video-sharing website: Hetereoglossic and multilingual communication by online users of International Multilingual Research Journal 14(1). 20–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Sumin & Michele Zappavigna
2018The interplay of (semiotic) technologies and genre: The case of the selfie. Social Semiotics 28(5). 665–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Yuxiang, Peng Xixian, Tang Jian & Song Shijie
2017Understanding young people’s We-intention to contribute in Danmaku websites: Motivational, social and subcultural influence. iConference 2017, 359–369.Google Scholar