In this paper, I report on a long-term research project concerned with the elaboration of the description of the system of PROCESS TYPE (within the overall system of TRANSITIVITY), extending this description in delicacy, or degree of detail. I discuss the background to the research and different approaches that have been taken to the development of more delicate descriptions of PROCESS TYPE. Then I introduce the approach that I have taken — to classify Levin’s (1993) verb classes in terms of the systemic functional description of the system of PROCESS TYPE (Halliday 1967/8, 1985). Having outlined the approach, I summarize the outcome of the classificatory project, and go on to identify all the instances where it was necessary to split verb classes and all the cases where it was necessary to add verb classes. I characterize the classification in terms of the cline of delicacy (the continuum between grammar and lexis); in fact, the result of the classificatory project provides strong evidence in favour of Halliday’s (1961) hypothesis that lexis can be described as delicate grammar — what he called ‘the grammarian’s dream’. In addition, I indicate how the result of the classification can be used as a resource in the development of more delicate systemic descriptions of the type pioneered by Hasan (1987) in her pursuit of the grammarian’s dream.
1971The grammar of case: Towards a localist theory. Cambridge: CUP.
Baker, Collin F. & Josef Ruppenhofer
2002FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In Julie Larson & Mary Paster (eds.),
Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
, 27–38. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
Bateman, John, Robert Kasper, Johanna Moore & Richard Whitney
1989A general organization of knowledge for natural language processing: The Penman upper model. Technical Report. Marina del Rey, CA: Information Sciences Institute.
Beavers, John, Beth Levin & Shiao Wei Tham
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 461. 331–377.
Caffarel, Alice, James R. Martin & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
Cheng, Winnie, Chris Greaves, John McH. Sinclair & Martin Warren
2009Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics 30(2). 236–252.
Chow, Ian & Jonathan J. Webster
2008Supervised clustering of the WordNet verb hierarchy for systemic functional process type identification.
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on global interoperability for language resources (ICGL)
, Hong Kong, PRC, 9–11 January 2008, 51–58.
Cook, Walter A
1977Case grammar: Development of the matrix model (1970–1978). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Cross, Marilyn
1992Choice in lexis: Computer generation of lexis as most delicate grammar. Language Sciences 14(4). 579–607.
Dang, Hoa Trang, Karin Kipper, Martha Palmer & Joseph Rosenzeig
1998Investigating regular sense extensions based on intersective Levin classes.
Coling/ACL-98 36th Association of Computational Linguistics conference
(Montreal (Canada), August 11–17), 293–300. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufman.
Davidse, Kristin
1999Categories of experiential grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics). Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
Dowty, David R
1979Word meaning and Montague Grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Fawcett, Robin P
1987The semantics of clause and verb for relational processes in English. In M.A.K. Halliday & Robin P. Fawcett (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics: Theory and description, 130–183. London: Pinter.
Fillmore, Charles J
1968The case for case. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–88.New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fillmore, Charles J
1970The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 120–133. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Fillmore, Charles J
1977The case for case reopened. In Peter Cole & Jerry Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Grammatical relations, vol. 81, 59–81. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Collin F. Baker
2001Frame semantics for text understanding. Proceedings of WordNet and other lexical resources workshop, 59–64. Pittsburgh, PA: NAACL.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Paul Kay
1987The goals of construction grammar. Berkeley Cognitive Science Program Technical Report no. 50. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Gruber, Jeffrey S
1965Studies in lexical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD thesis.
Gruber, Jeffrey S
1976Lexical structures in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Haiman, John
1985Natural syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Hale, Austin
1974On the systematization of Box 4. In Ruth Brend (ed.), Advances in tagmemics, 55–74.Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Halliday, M.A.K
1961Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 242–292.
Halliday, M.A.K
1966Some notes on ‘deep’ grammar. Journal of Linguistics 2(1). 57–67.
Halliday, M.A.K
1967/8. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81, 3(2). 199–244 & 4(2). 179–215.
Halliday, M.A.K
1969Options and functions in the English clause. Brno studies in English 81. 81–8. Reprinted in Halliday, M.A.K. 2005. Studies in English Language. Collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. 7 (edited by Jonathan Webster), 154–163. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K
1975Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K
1976System and function in language, edited by Gunther Kress. London: OUP.
Halliday, M.A.K
1985An introduction to functional grammar, 1st edn. London: Arnold.
1996On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Reprinted in Halliday, M.A.K. 2002. On grammar. Collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. 1 (edited by Jonathan Webster), 384–417. London: Continuum.
2004The language of early childhood. Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, vol. 41, edited by Jonathan Webster. London: Continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
2004An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1985Lending and borrowing: From grammar to lexis. Beiträge zur Phonetik und Linguistik 481. 56–67.
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1987The grammarian’s dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. In M.A.K. Halliday & Robin P. Fawcett (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics: Theory and description, 184–211. London: Pinter.
Hjelmslev, Louis
1935/37. La catégorie des cas: étude de grammaire générale, 2 vols. Acta Jutlandica VII(1). xii–184 & IX(2).viii–78.
Hopper, Paul & Sandra A. Thompson
1980Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 561. 251–99.
Hori, Motoko
2006Pain expressions in Japanese. In Geoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), System and corpus: Exploring connections, 206–225. London: Equinox.
Hornby, A.S
1954A guide to patterns and usage in English. London: OUP.
1993English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav
2011Lexical conceptual structure. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus Von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 11, 420–440. Berlin: Mouton.
Longacre, Robert
1976Anatomy of speech notions. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.
Lyons, John
1968Theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.
Martin, J.R
1996Metalinguistic diversity: The case from case. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 323–375. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Martin, J.R. & Robert Veel
(eds.)1998Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London: Routledge.
Mason, Ian
2003Text parameters in translation: Transitivity and institutional cultures. In Eva Hajicova, Peter Sgall, Zuzana Jettmarova, Annely Rothkegel, Dorothee Rothfuß-Bastian & Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast (eds.), Textologie und translation (Jahrbuch Übersetzen und Dolmetschen 4/2), 175–188. Tübingen: Narr. Reprinted in Lawrence Venuti (ed.). 2004. The translation studies reader, Second edition. 470–481. London: Routledge.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
1987Notes on the organization of the environment of a text generation grammar. In Gerard Kempen (ed.), Natural language generation, 253–278. Dordrecht: Nijhof.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
1995Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
1996Tense in English seen through systemic-functional theory. In Christopher S. Butler, Margaret Berry, Robin Fawcett & Guowen Huang (eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations, 431–498. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2004Descriptive motifs and generalizations. In Alice Caffarel, James R. Martin & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (eds.). Language typology: A functional perspective. 537–673. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
2006Frequency profiles of some basic grammatical systems: An interim report. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 103–142.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M
2007The lexicogrammar of emotion and attitude in English. Published in electronic proceedings on CD based on contributions to the Third international congress on English Grammar (ICEG 3), Sona College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India, January 23–27, 2006.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & John Bateman
1991Text generation and Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M., Kazuhiro Teruya & Wu Canzhong
2008Multilingual studies as a multi-dimensional space of interconnected language studies. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Meaning in context, 146–221. London: Continuum.
Mel’chuk, Igor
1982Lexical functions in lexicographic description.
Proceedings of the eighth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
, 427–444. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Mortensen, Lynne
1992A transitivity analysis of discourse in dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Neurolinguistics 7(4). 309–321.
Neale, Amy
2002More delicate transitivity: Extending the process type system networks for English to include full semantic classifications. Cardiff: Cardiff University PhD thesis.
Neale, Amy
2006Matching corpus data and system networks: Using corpora to modify and extend the system networks for transitivity in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 143–163.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R.L. Petruk, Christopher R. Johnson & Jan Scheffczyk
2006FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. [URL]
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalisation patterns. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume III. Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.
Talmy, Leonard
2007Lexical typology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume III. Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd edn, 66–168. Cambridge: CUP.
Teruya, Kazuhiro
1998An exploration into the world of experience: A systemic-functional interpretation of the grammar of Japanese. Sydney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.
Teruya, Kazuhiro
2007A systemic functional grammar of Japanese, 2 vols1. London: Continuum.
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.
1997The lexicogrammar of adjectives: A systemic functional approach to lexis. London: Cassell.
Tucker, Gordon
2007Between grammar and lexis: Towards a systemic functional account of phraseology. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & Jonathan Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, 953–977. London: Equinox.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr
2006Some universals of verb semantics. In Ricardo Mairal & Juana Gil (eds.), Linguistic universals, 155–178. Cambridge: CUP.
Vendler, Zeno
1967Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Viberg, Åke
1984The verbs of perception: A typological study. In Brian Butterworth, Bernard Comrie & Östen Dahl (eds.), Explanations for language universals, 123–162. The Hague: Mouton.
1997Exploring lexical resources for text generation in a systemic functional language model. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes PhD thesis.
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1956Language, thought and reality, edited by J.B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna
1987English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Wu, Canzhong
2000Modelling linguistic resources. Sydney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Fontaine, Lise
2017. Lexis as most local context: towards an SFL approach to lexicology. Functional Linguistics 4:1
Hu, Jian
2023. The Lexical and Syntactic Properties of MM. In A Constructional Approach to Interpersonal Metaphor of Modality [Peking University Linguistics Research, 7], ► pp. 67 ff.
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
2017. FIGURE and GROUND in the construal of motion: a registerial perspective. <i>WORD</i> 63:1 ► pp. 62 ff.
Kashyap, Abhishek Kumar & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
2019. The representation of motion in discourse: variation across registers. Language Sciences 72 ► pp. 71 ff.
Martin, J. R. & Priscilla Angela T. Cruz
2019. Relational Processes in Tagalog: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Perspective. In Discourses of Southeast Asia [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ], ► pp. 225 ff.
Martinec, Radan
2020. Linguistic Rhythm and its Meaning. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 14:1-2 ► pp. 70 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Bo Wang, Isaac N. Mwinlaaru & Yuanyi Ma
2018. ‘The axial rethink’ – making sense of language: an interview with Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. Functional Linguistics 5:1
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M., Jorge Arús-Hita & Kazuhiro Teruya
2021. Translations of Representations of Moving and Saying from English into Spanish. <i>WORD</i> 67:2 ► pp. 188 ff.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Abhishek Kumar Kashyap
2014. The construal of space in different registers: an exploratory study. Language Sciences 45 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ng, Anthony
2020. The construal of requests for action: Expounding indeterminancy for socio-communicative risks and failures in public health. <i>WORD</i> 66:3 ► pp. 194 ff.
Peña-Cervel, M. Sandra
2016. Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Fake Reflexive Resultatives*. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 502 ff.
Su, Hang
2020. Synergising Corpus, Functional and Cultural Approaches to Critical Discourse Studies: A Case Study of the Discursive Representation of Chinese Dream. In Corpus-based Approaches to Grammar, Media and Health Discourses [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ], ► pp. 157 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.